...because "build configuration" is already the name of an Xcode feature.
- '#if' et al are "conditional compilation directives".
- The condition is a "conditional compilation expression", or just
"condition" if it's obvious.
- The predicates are "platform conditions" (including 'swift(>=...)')
- The options set with -D are "custom conditional compilation flags".
(Thanks, Kevin!)
I left "IfConfigDecl" as is, as well as SourceKit's various "BuildConfig"
settings because some of them are part of the SourceKit request format.
We can change these in follow-up commits, or not.
rdar://problem/19812930
Now that we have expressions that start with #, the [# introducer for
object literals is no longer guaranteed to indicate an object
literal. For example:
[#line, #column]
is an array literal and
[#line : #column]
is a dictionary literal. Use additional lookahead in the parser to
disambiguate these cases from object literals. Fixes
rdar://problem/24533081.
This tweet: https://twitter.com/radexp/status/694561060230184960 pointed out
the sad truth that most people don't know that stmt-condition can contain
(including a fixit) when they try to use && instead of commas between clauses.
Before:
t.swift:4:16: error: #available may only be used as condition of an 'if', 'guard' or 'while' statement
if x == y && #available(iOS 9, *) { }
^
t.swift:5:27: error: expected '{' after 'if' condition
if #available(iOS 9, *) && x == y {}
^
t.swift:5:37: error: braced block of statements is an unused closure
if #available(iOS 9, *) && x == y {}
^
t.swift:5:37: error: expression resolves to an unused function
if #available(iOS 9, *) && x == y {}
^~
After:
t.swift:4:13: error: expected ',' joining parts of a multi-clause condition
if x == y && #available(iOS 9, *) { }
^~
,
t.swift:5:27: error: expected ',' joining parts of a multi-clause condition
if #available(iOS 9, *) && x == y {}
^~
,
When we're code completing a postfix or dot expression inside the
subexpression of an #selector expression, prefer compound function
names. This helps us write, e.g.,
#selector(UIView.
and get completions such as "insertSubview(_:aboveSubview:)". Fixes
rdar://problem/24470075.
When one spells a compound declaration name in the source (e.g.,
insertSubview(_:aboveSubview:), keep track of the locations of the
base name, parentheses, and argument labels.
UnresolvedConstructorExpr is not providing any value here; it's
essentially just UnresolvedDotExpr where the name refers to an
initializer, so use that instead. NFC
Basic implementatation of SE-0021, naming functions with argument
labels. Handle parsing of compound function names in various
unqualified-identifier productions, updating the AST representation of
various expressions from Identifiers to DeclNames. The result doesn't
capture all of the source locations we want; more on that later.
As part of this, remove the parsing code for the "selector-style"
method names, since we now have a replacement. The feature was never
publicized and doesn't make sense in Swift, so zap it outright.
It is a common point of confusion that property initializers cannot access self, so
produce a tailored diagnostic for it.
Also, when building implicit TypeExprs for the self type, properly mark them implicit.
People will keep typing try/catch either due to muscle memory from other languages or
when they are first learning swift. We now produce a nice error message + fixit of:
t.swift:14:3: error: the 'do' keyword is used to specify a 'catch' region
try {
^~~
do
instead of spewing out:
t.swift:15:4: error: consecutive statements on a line must be separated by ';'
} catch { }
^
;
t.swift:15:5: error: expected expression
} catch { }
^
t.swift:15:11: error: braced block of statements is an unused closure
} catch { }
^
t.swift:14:7: error: expression resolves to an unused function
try {
~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
t.swift:15:11: error: expression resolves to an unused function
} catch { }
^~~
t.swift:14:3: warning: no calls to throwing functions occur within 'try' expression
try {
^
This adds some heuristics so we can emit a fixit to remove extraneous
whitespace after a . and diagnose the case where a member just hasn't
been written yet better. This also improves handling of tok::unknown
throughout the parser a bit.
This is a re-commit of ff4ea54 with an update for a SourceKit test.
This adds some heuristics so we can emit a fixit to remove extraneous
whitespace after a . and diagnose the case where a member just hasn't
been written yet better. This also improves handling of tok::unknown
throughout the parser a bit.
Parameters (to methods, initializers, accessors, subscripts, etc) have always been represented
as Pattern's (of a particular sort), stemming from an early design direction that was abandoned.
Being built on top of patterns leads to patterns being overly complicated (e.g. tuple patterns
have to have varargs and default parameters) and make working on parameter lists complicated
and error prone. This might have been ok in 2015, but there is no way we can live like this in
2016.
Instead of using Patterns, carve out a new ParameterList and Parameter type to represent all the
parameter specific stuff. This simplifies many things and allows a lot of simplifications.
Unfortunately, I wasn't able to do this very incrementally, so this is a huge patch. The good
news is that it erases a ton of code, and the technical debt that went with it. Ignoring test
suite changes, we have:
77 files changed, 2359 insertions(+), 3221 deletions(-)
This patch also makes a bunch of wierd things dead, but I'll sweep those out in follow-on
patches.
Fixes <rdar://problem/22846558> No code completions in Foo( when Foo has error type
Fixes <rdar://problem/24026538> Slight regression in generated header, which I filed to go with 3a23d75.
Fixes an overloading bug involving default arguments and curried functions (see the diff to
Constraints/diagnostics.swift, which we now correctly accept).
Fixes cases where problems with parameters would get emitted multiple times, e.g. in the
test/Parse/subscripting.swift testcase.
The source range for ParamDecl now includes its type, which permutes some of the IDE / SourceModel tests
(for the better, I think).
Eliminates the bogus "type annotation missing in pattern" error message when a type isn't
specified for a parameter (see test/decl/func/functions.swift).
This now consistently parenthesizes argument lists in function types, which leads to many diffs in the
SILGen tests among others.
This does break the "sibling indentation" test in SourceKit/CodeFormat/indent-sibling.swift, and
I haven't been able to figure it out. Given that this is experimental functionality anyway,
I'm just XFAILing the test for now. i'll look at it separately from this mongo diff.
Allow all keywords except for parameter introducers (var/let/inout) to
be argument labels when declaring or calling a
function/initializer/subscript, e.g., this
func touchesMatching(phase: NSTouchPhase, `in` view: NSView?) -> Set<NSTouch>
can now be expressed as
func touchesMatching(phase: NSTouchPhase, in view: NSView?) -> Set<NSTouch>
and the call goes from
event.touchesMatching(phase, `in`: view)
to
event.touchesMatching(phase, in: view)
Fixes [SR-344](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-344) /
rdar://problem/22415674.
Now we can handle simple cases like
1 + 1 == 2 <here>
and correctly suggest both + on the 2 and || on the boolean. When the
LHS doesn't type-check we fallback to using only the operand immediately
to the left.
Swift SVN r32489
When users invoke code completion at an argument position, we suggest argument names,
if required however not specified, or a list of argument values. These values are annotated
with their type relation to the expected argument types, so that
Xcode can prioritize those values that apply over those that do not.
This also fixes: rdar://21727063
Swift SVN r31505
This allows tools, like code completion or jumping to definition, to be able to resolve
function names even though the argument is wrong.
Swift SVN r31387
When users complete the right-hand side of an assignment expression, we only
show the results whose types are convertible to those of the left-hand side.
Swift SVN r31357
Before this commit, for unresolved members, code completion suggests all visible enum elements
and option set types. To refine the results, this commit uses constraint solver to infer
the type of unresolved members by analyzing parental expressions. If the solver has solutions,
we complete the unresolved member, otherwise abort.
rdar://16659653
Swift SVN r31195
This commit completes an unresolved member with all visible enum elements.
We need future work to reduce the list to those that are guaranteed to be
resolved under the current context.
Swift SVN r31063
using it to improve closure diagnostics by inferring the types of otherwise
untyped closure paramdecls from this context information. This
resolves:
<rdar://problem/20371273> Type errors inside anonymous functions don't provide enough information
producing
error: binary operator '==' cannot be applied to operands of type 'Int' and 'UInt'
note: overloads for '==' exist with these partially matching parameter lists: (UInt, UInt), (Int, Int)
and:
<rdar://problem/20978044> QoI: Poor diagnostic when using an incorrect tuple element in a closure
producing:
error: value of tuple type '(Int, Int)' has no member '2'
and probably a lot more. We're still limited from getting things like "foo.map {...}" because
we're not doing type subsitutions from the base into the protocol extension member.
Swift SVN r30971
