This ireapplies commit 255c52de9f.
Original commit message:
Serialize debug scope and location info in the SIL assembler language.
At the moment it is only possible to test the effects that SIL
optimization passes have on debug information by observing the
effects of a full .swift -> LLVM IR compilation. This change enable us
to write targeted testcases for single SIL optimization passes.
The new syntax is as follows:
sil-scope-ref ::= 'scope' [0-9]+
sil-scope ::= 'sil_scope' [0-9]+ '{'
sil-loc
'parent' scope-parent
('inlined_at' sil-scope-ref )?
'}'
scope-parent ::= sil-function-name ':' sil-type
scope-parent ::= sil-scope-ref
sil-loc ::= 'loc' string-literal ':' [0-9]+ ':' [0-9]+
Each instruction may have a debug location and a SIL scope reference
at the end. Debug locations consist of a filename, a line number, and
a column number. If the debug location is omitted, it defaults to the
location in the SIL source file. SIL scopes describe the position
inside the lexical scope structure that the Swift expression a SIL
instruction was generated from had originally. SIL scopes also hold
inlining information.
<rdar://problem/22706994>
At the moment it is only possible to test the effects that SIL
optimization passes have on debug information by observing the
effects of a full .swift -> LLVM IR compilation. This change enable us
to write targeted testcases for single SIL optimization passes.
The new syntax is as follows:
sil-scope-ref ::= 'scope' [0-9]+
sil-scope ::= 'sil_scope' [0-9]+ '{'
sil-loc
'parent' scope-parent
('inlined_at' sil-scope-ref )?
'}'
scope-parent ::= sil-function-name ':' sil-type
scope-parent ::= sil-scope-ref
sil-loc ::= 'loc' string-literal ':' [0-9]+ ':' [0-9]+
Each instruction may have a debug location and a SIL scope reference
at the end. Debug locations consist of a filename, a line number, and
a column number. If the debug location is omitted, it defaults to the
location in the SIL source file. SIL scopes describe the position
inside the lexical scope structure that the Swift expression a SIL
instruction was generated from had originally. SIL scopes also hold
inlining information.
<rdar://problem/22706994>
remove the mixed concept that was SILFileLocation.
Also add support for a third type of underlying storage that will be used
for deserialized debug lcoations from textual SIL.
NFC
<rdar://problem/22706994>
with user code and that the boilerplate is counted towards the prologue.
<rdar://problem/18563763> Setting a breakpoint on "main" in a Swift program doesn't stop at user code
Swift SVN r22611
Eliminate the intermediate top_level_code function. Now that SIL is expressive enough to express a "main" function, there's no reason for it, and this eliminates a bunch of mystery code in IRGen to thunk from main to top_level_code by reaching for hardcoded symbol names. Demystify the special code for setting up C_ARGC and C_ARGV by having SILGen look for a transparent "_didEnterMain" hook in the stdlib and emit a call to it.
Swift SVN r22525
Given a destructor that is not implicit, one will have a decl that is not
autogenerated implying that this assert will always be hit.
I am going to submit an additional patch after this that changes
InlineLocation/MandatoryInlinedLocation/CleanupLocation that ensures that
the special flags on SILLocation are propagated appropriately (which they are
not right now).
Swift SVN r11595
The empty tuple used for return value when none is supplied does not really correspond to user code. (We don’t have epilog, so mark it as pert of cleanup.)
The destroy_addr instructions are doing the cleanup.
Swift SVN r9765
This will allow us to differentiate from regular inlined code (as in optimization inlining). Some passes(AllocBocToStack) and debug info would be allowed to be more aggressive/preserve less debug info with mandatory inlined code.
Swift SVN r9339
Also, change the location of "looping back to head" branch to point to the closing brace of the body, which is a more natural source location than the beginning of the enclosing loop statement.
Swift SVN r7989
Auto generated location should not be a separate location kind since
we might have different kinds of auto generated locations (ex: cleanup,
return). Even though the kind info might not be necessary for diagnostics or
debug info, it allows us to better use type system, for example, only pass
CleanupLocation where expected.
Swift SVN r7816
I've decided to keep only the location of the scope AST node that corresponds to the cleanup. (Currently, there is no user that needs the originator expression, which caused the cleanup. So keeping things simple.)
Added the cleanup location to the Scope and JumpDest classes, which gets assigned on construction of those. The Scope's and JumpDest locations are used when we emit the cleanup instructions.
We now give better location info for 2 existing tests for definitive initialization.
(+ Rather sparse testing of all this.)
Swift SVN r7764
The test displays "<invalid loc>" even though the SIL location is
non-null because the corresponding AST node (Expr) does not have a location.
Swift SVN r7066
Added a -v(verbose) option to swift that will trigger verbose printing in SIL
Printer. SIL Printer will print the location info only in the verbose mode.
Here is the example of the format - only the line and colon are displayed for
brevity:
%24 = apply %13(%22) : $[cc(method), thin] ((), [byref] Bool) -> Builtin.Int1 // user: %26 line:46:10
(This will be used to test the validity of SILLocation info.)
Swift SVN r6991
This doubles SILLocation to being two words, since SourceLocations
can't be dumped into a PointerUnion, but it is due for a redesign someday
anyway, so I'm not going to worry about it.
Swift SVN r6989
As per Chris's suggestion (review of r6152), further refactored SILLocation not to derive from PointerUnion3 but to include it as a member.
In addition, added some template magic to make sure we don't have to chain dyn_casts, which I suspect will be/is happening a lot with SILLocation:
Ex:
- if (auto E = Func.dyn_cast<Expr*>()) {
- if (const FuncExpr *FE = dyn_cast<FuncExpr>(E))
- return SILLocation(FE->getBody())
+ if (const FuncExpr *FE = Func.getAs<FuncExpr>())
+ return SILLocation(FE->getBody());
Swift SVN r6283
