Similarly to how we've always handled parameter types, we
now recursively expand tuples in result types and separately
determine a result convention for each result.
The most important code-generation change here is that
indirect results are now returned separately from each
other and from any direct results. It is generally far
better, when receiving an indirect result, to receive it
as an independent result; the caller is much more likely
to be able to directly receive the result in the address
they want to initialize, rather than having to receive it
in temporary memory and then copy parts of it into the
target.
The most important conceptual change here that clients and
producers of SIL must be aware of is the new distinction
between a SILFunctionType's *parameters* and its *argument
list*. The former is just the formal parameters, derived
purely from the parameter types of the original function;
indirect results are no longer in this list. The latter
includes the indirect result arguments; as always, all
the indirect results strictly precede the parameters.
Apply instructions and entry block arguments follow the
argument list, not the parameter list.
A relatively minor change is that there can now be multiple
direct results, each with its own result convention.
This is a minor change because I've chosen to leave
return instructions as taking a single operand and
apply instructions as producing a single result; when
the type describes multiple results, they are implicitly
bound up in a tuple. It might make sense to split these
up and allow e.g. return instructions to take a list
of operands; however, it's not clear what to do on the
caller side, and this would be a major change that can
be separated out from this already over-large patch.
Unsurprisingly, the most invasive changes here are in
SILGen; this requires substantial reworking of both call
emission and reabstraction. It also proved important
to switch several SILGen operations over to work with
RValue instead of ManagedValue, since otherwise they
would be forced to spuriously "implode" buffers.
The main idea here is that we really, really want to be
able to recover the protocol requirement of a conformance
reference even if it's abstract due to the conforming type
being abstract (e.g. an archetype). I've made the conversion
from ProtocolConformance* explicit to discourage casual
contamination of the Ref with a null value.
As part of this change, always make conformance arrays in
Substitutions fully parallel to the requirements, as opposed
to occasionally being empty when the conformances are abstract.
As another part of this, I've tried to proactively fix
prospective bugs with partially-concrete conformances, which I
believe can happen with concretely-bound archetypes.
In addition to just giving us stronger invariants, this is
progress towards the removal of the archetype from Substitution.
Parameters (to methods, initializers, accessors, subscripts, etc) have always been represented
as Pattern's (of a particular sort), stemming from an early design direction that was abandoned.
Being built on top of patterns leads to patterns being overly complicated (e.g. tuple patterns
have to have varargs and default parameters) and make working on parameter lists complicated
and error prone. This might have been ok in 2015, but there is no way we can live like this in
2016.
Instead of using Patterns, carve out a new ParameterList and Parameter type to represent all the
parameter specific stuff. This simplifies many things and allows a lot of simplifications.
Unfortunately, I wasn't able to do this very incrementally, so this is a huge patch. The good
news is that it erases a ton of code, and the technical debt that went with it. Ignoring test
suite changes, we have:
77 files changed, 2359 insertions(+), 3221 deletions(-)
This patch also makes a bunch of wierd things dead, but I'll sweep those out in follow-on
patches.
Fixes <rdar://problem/22846558> No code completions in Foo( when Foo has error type
Fixes <rdar://problem/24026538> Slight regression in generated header, which I filed to go with 3a23d75.
Fixes an overloading bug involving default arguments and curried functions (see the diff to
Constraints/diagnostics.swift, which we now correctly accept).
Fixes cases where problems with parameters would get emitted multiple times, e.g. in the
test/Parse/subscripting.swift testcase.
The source range for ParamDecl now includes its type, which permutes some of the IDE / SourceModel tests
(for the better, I think).
Eliminates the bogus "type annotation missing in pattern" error message when a type isn't
specified for a parameter (see test/decl/func/functions.swift).
This now consistently parenthesizes argument lists in function types, which leads to many diffs in the
SILGen tests among others.
This does break the "sibling indentation" test in SourceKit/CodeFormat/indent-sibling.swift, and
I haven't been able to figure it out. Given that this is experimental functionality anyway,
I'm just XFAILing the test for now. i'll look at it separately from this mongo diff.
when working with autoreleased result conventions, and stop
emitting autorelease_return and strong_retain_autoreleased in
SILGen.
The previous representation, in which strong_retain_autoreleased
was divorced from the call site, allowed it to "wander off" and
be cloned. This would at best would break the optimization, but
it could also lead to broken IR due to some heroic but perhaps
misguided efforts in IRGen to produce the exact required code
pattern despite the representational flaws.
The SIL pattern for an autoreleased result now looks exactly
like the pattern for an owned result in both the caller and
the callee. This should be fine as long as interprocedural
optimizations are conservative about convention mismatches.
Optimizations that don't wish to be conservative here should
treat a convention mismatch as an autorelease (if the callee
has an autoreleased result) or a retain (if the formal type
of the call has an autoreleased result).
Fixes rdar://23810212, which is an IRGen miscompile after the
optimizer cloned a strong_retain_autoreleased. There's no
point in adding this test case because the new SIL pattern
inherently prevents this transformation by construction.
The 'autorelease_return' and 'strong_retain_autoreleased'
instructions are now dead, and I will remove them in a
follow-up commit.
Modeling nonescaping captures as @inout parameters is wrong, because captures are allowed to share state, unlike 'inout' parameters, which are allowed to assume to some degree that there are no aliases during the parameter's scope. To model this, introduce a new @inout_aliasable parameter convention to indicate an indirect parameter that can be written to, not only by the current function, but by well-typed, well-synchronized aliasing accesses too. (This is unrelated to our discussions of adding a "type-unsafe-aliasable" annotation to pointer_to_address to allow for safe pointer punning.)
- If a @convention(block) function parameter was also marked @noescape, then during type-checking, we would accidentally propagate the convention directly onto a literal closure expr, instead of going through a function_conversion, which SILGen didn't handle. Fixes rdar://problem/23261912.
- If an Objective-C API declared a block parameter with a _Nonnull return of a bridged type, such as NSString *_Nonnull, then native-to-bridged thunking would fail to recognize this case, since we still bridge to an Optional type in the lowered ObjC interface. Fixes rdar://problem/23285766.
The @objc method argument bridging did the right thing but for
func to block thunks we didn't handle optionals and IUOs.
Symptoms included memory leaks because IRGen would later try to
retain the block by calling Block_copy() and discarding the result,
or memory corruption because the on-stack block could outlive
its stack frame.
Fixes <rdar://problem/22471309>.
Swift SVN r31882
Previously we would ignore inout when bridging, but now we need
to take it into account for Clang-generated accessors.
Note that @block_storage must be special cased, because we always
require @inout to be specified together with @block_storage, and
@inout @block_storage is not a pointer type to some underlying
type, but rather a special block pointer type that comes directly
from the Clang AST context.
Swift SVN r31778
These are contexts where we have enough information to bridge /back/
properly; that is, where we can distinguish CBool, ObjCBool, and
DarwinBoolean. In cases where we can't, we keep the three separate;
only CBool is really the same type as Bool.
This also affects current import behavior for ObjCBool, which was previously
incorrectly conflated with CBool in certain cases.
More rdar://problem/19013551
Swift SVN r30051
The other asserts do a lot of sanity checking of argument counting
already, so this assert doesn't appear to be necessary and causes
it to assert when you try to generate a zero-argument C function.
Swift SVN r27642
These aren't really orthogonal concerns--you'll never have a @thick @cc(objc_method), or an @objc_block @cc(witness_method)--and we have gross decision trees all over the codebase that try to hopscotch between the subset of combinations that make sense. Stop the madness by eliminating AbstractCC and folding its states into SILFunctionTypeRepresentation. This cleans up a ton of code across the compiler.
I couldn't quite eliminate AbstractCC's information from AST function types, since SIL type lowering transiently created AnyFunctionTypes with AbstractCCs set, even though these never occur at the source level. To accommodate type lowering, allow AnyFunctionType::ExtInfo to carry a SILFunctionTypeRepresentation, and arrange for the overlapping representations to share raw values.
In order to avoid disturbing test output, AST and SILFunctionTypes are still printed and parsed using the existing @thin/@thick/@objc_block and @cc() attributes, which is kind of gross, but lets me stage in the real source-breaking change separately.
Swift SVN r27095
The set of attributes that make sense at the AST level is increasingly divergent from those at the SIL level, so it doesn't really make sense for these to be the same. It'll also help prevent us from accidental unwanted propagation of attributes from the AST to SIL, which has caused bugs in the past. For staging purposes, start off with SILFunctionType's versions exactly the same as the FunctionType versions, which necessitates some ugly glue code but minimizes the potential disruption.
Swift SVN r27022
