We want to make sure that a global lookup always finds the Swift module
first. Moreover, we should never be loading two modules with the same name
into the same TU /unless/ they are (a) identical or (b) a Swift / C pair.
Swift SVN r3723
Swift's diagnostic system is built on the quaint notion that every
declaration known to the front end has a valid source location to
which diagnostics mentioning that declaration (say, in a "here is a
candidate" note) can point. However, with a real module system, the
source corresponding to a declaration in a module does not need to be
present, so we can't rely on source locations.
Instead of source locations, allow diagnostics to be anchored at a
declaration. If that declaration has source-location information, it
is used. Otherwise, we just drop source-location information for
now. In the future, we'll find a better way to render this information
so it feels natural for the programmer.
Swift SVN r3413
This change allows client code to just use, e.g.,
import Foundation
to get both the Clang Foundation module and the Swift Foundation
module that provides various adaptation (typically via
extensions). At some point later, we can consider whether the modules
will end up in different namespaces somehow, or whether this is best
tackled by some kind of module re-export directive, but for now it's
convenient while we await the design of a real module system for
Swift.
Swift SVN r3405
From a user's perspective, one imports Clang modules using the normal
Swift syntax for module imports, e.g.,
import Cocoa
However, to enable importing Clang modules, one needs to point Swift
at a particular SDK with the -sdk= argument, e.g.,
swift -sdk=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.9M.sdk
and, of course, that SDK needs to provide support for modules.
There are a number of moving parts here. The major pieces are:
CMake support for linking Clang into Swift: CMake users will now need
to set the SWIFT_PATH_TO_CLANG_SOURCE and SWIFT_PATH_TO_CLANG_BUILD
to the locations of the Clang source tree (which defaults to
tools/clang under your LLVM source tree) and the Clang build tree.
Makefile support for linking Clang into Swift: Makefile users will
need to have Clang located in tools/clang and Swift located in
tools/swift, and builds should just work.
Module loader abstraction: similar to Clang's module loader,
a module loader is responsible for resolving a module name to an
actual module, loading that module in the process. It will also be
responsible for performing name lookup into that module.
Clang importer: the only implementation of the module loader
abstraction, the importer creates a Clang compiler instance capable of
building and loading Clang modules. The approach we take here is to
parse a dummy .m file in Objective-C ARC mode with modules enabled,
but never tear down that compilation unit. Then, when we get a request
to import a Clang module, we turn that into a module-load request to
Clang's module loader, which will build an appropriate module
on-the-fly or used a cached module file.
Note that name lookup into Clang modules is not yet
implemented. That's the next major step.
Swift SVN r3199
the constraint-based type checker:
-constraint-checker turns on constraint-based type checking for the
current swift module (but not imported modules; we're not ready for that)
-debug-constraints turns on detailed debugging information for the
constraint-based type checker
Use these flags to de-REPL-ify the tests for the constraint-based type
checker. The REPL is still quite useful for experimenting with the
type checker, but shouldn't be our normal means of testing it.
Swift SVN r2840
and type validation should never fail in a call to validateTypeSimple.
The one thing I really don't like about this whole approach is that we end
up with validateTypeSimple calls scattered all over the place...
the ultimate solution here is probably something along the lines of
introducing getUnvalidated() getters for types for use from the parser,
and make the standard getters for types assert that the type is valid
and perform any necessary computations themselves.
Swift SVN r2728
and Int[].
Type resolution for types named in ExtensionDecls remains a part of name-binding; it has to use more restrictive rules because we can't perform general member lookup until
we've resolved all the types named in ExtensionDecls.
Swift SVN r2313
functions. This involves a few steps:
- When assigning archetypes to type parameters, also walk all of the
protocols to which the type parameter conforms and assign archetypes
to each of the associated types.
- When performing name lookup into an archetype, look into all of
the protocols to which it conforms. If we find something, it can be
referenced via the new ArchetypeMemberRefExpr.
- When type-checking ArchetypeMemberRefExpr, substitute the values
of the various associated types into the type of the member, so the
resulting expression involves the archetypes for the enclosing
generic method.
The rest of the type checking essentially follows from the fact that
archetypes are unique types which (therefore) have no behavior beyond
what is provided via the protocols they conform to. However, there is
still much work to do to ensure that we get the archetypes set up
correctly.
Swift SVN r2201
protocol Document { var title : String }
protocol Versioning { func bumpVersion() }
protocol VersionedDocument : Document, Versioning { }
This commit covers the basic functionality of protocol inheritance, including:
- Parsing & AST representation
- Conforming to a protocol also requires conforming to its inherited
protocols
- Member lookup into a protocol also looks into its inherited
protocols (results are aggregated; there is no name hiding)
- Teach ErasureExpr to maintain lvalueness, so we don't end up
performing a silly load/erase/materialize dance when accessing
members from an inherited protocol.
Swift SVN r1804
multiple times, as well as teaching the name lookup mechanism that
it's similarly rude to report ambiguous results because it searched
the same import twice. Fixes <rdar://problem/11287213>.
Yes, this is a bit of an ugly hack.
Swift SVN r1610
oneof/struct/protocol within a static method. The lookup is performed
on the metatype (as one would get when using qualified syntax
Type.member). Add tests to verify that this provides proper
overloading behavior.
As a drive-by, actually set the type of the implicit 'this' variable
during name binding for a non-static method.
Swift SVN r1394
notion of a reference to a set of declarations. Introduce one derived
class, OverloadedDeclRefExpr, which covers the only case we currently
handle for overload resolution [*]: a direct (unqualified) reference
to an overloaded set of entities. Future subclasses should handle,
e.g., overloaded member references such as a.b or a.b.c.
[*] Ugly hacks for static methods notwithstanding
Swift SVN r1345
I haven't really carefully considered whether existing type-checking etc. is correct for the main module (I think the name-binding rules need to be a bit different?), but it seems to work well enough for the obvious cases.
This is enough to get the one-liner "println(10)" to print "10" in "swift -i" mode, although the path to swift.swift still needs to be explicitly provided with -I.
Swift SVN r1325
