This patch introduces a new kind of pattern for matching bool literals, i.e. true and false. Essentially, it is very similar to a pattern for matching enum elements, but simpler. Most of the code is just a boiler plate code copy/pasted from the code for enum element patterns. The only different thing is the emitBoolDispatch function, which emits a SIL code for matching bools.
With this patch, we don't get any false non-exhaustive switch diagnostics for switches on bools anymore. And we have a lot of radars complaining about it. For example rdar://16514545 and rdar://20130240.
Note, that this patch fixes the non-exhaustive switch diagnostics without changing the internal representation of bools. Implementing bool as an enum would have the same effect when it comes to these diagnostics and we would get this diagnostics fix for free, i.e. without any code committed here. But implementing bools-as-enums is an ongoing work and I'm investigating its performance implications. If we become confident that bool-as-enum does not have a negative impact on performance and decide to merge it, then we can revert this patch as it would not be necessary anymore. But if we decide to skip the enum-as-bool approach to its performance issues, then we would have at least fixed the false non-exhaustive diagnostics for bools by means of this patch.
Swift SVN r26650
We no longer need or use it since we can always refer to the same bit on
the applied function when deciding whether to inline during mandatory
inlining.
Resolves rdar://problem/19478366.
Swift SVN r26534
Rename 'assignment' attribute of infix operators to 'mutating'. Add
'has_assignment' attribute, which results in an implicit declaration of
the assignment version of the same operator. Parse "func =foo"
declaration and "foo.=bar" expression. Validate some basic properties of
in-place methods.
Not yet implemented: automatic generation of wrapper for =foo() if foo()
is implemented, or vice versa; likewise for operators.
Swift SVN r26508
Start allowing extensions to redeclare type parameters, which will get
different archetypes from the original nominal type. When an extension
does not redeclare type parameters, silently clone the nominal type's
generic type parameters so we still get distinct type parameters.
When deserializing an extension, wire up its generic parameter list so
we get the right archetypes for its members. This doesn't change the
module format (that happened earlier).
When determining the substitutions for an associated type that comes
from a different declaration context from the conformance that will
own the witness, be sure to map into the conformance's
DeclContext. Otherwise, we'll end up with tangled archetypes.
Fixes rdar://problem/16519588.
Swift SVN r26483
Primarily, unique normal protocol conformances and reference them via
a conformance ID. This eliminates the use of trailing records for
normal protocol conformances and (more importantly) the cases were we
would write incomplete conformances. The latter could cause problems
if we ever ended up deserializing an incomplete conformance without
also deserializing a complete record for that same conformance.
Secondarily, simplify the way we write conformances. They are now
always trailing records, and we separate out the derived conformance
kinds (specialized/inherited) from either a reference to a normal
conformance in the current module file (via a normal conformance ID)
or via a cross-reference to a conformance in another module file
(currently always a normal conformance, but this need not always be
the case). As part of this, make each conformance record
self-sustaining, so we don't have to push information down to the
reading routines (e.g., the conforming type) to actually produce a
proper conformance. This simplifies deserialization logic further.
Swift SVN r26482
Currently a no-op, but effective access for entities within the current
module will soon need to take testability into account. This declaration:
internal func foo() {}
has a formal access of 'internal', but an effective access of 'public' if
we're in a testable mode.
Part of rdar://problem/17732115 (testability)
Swift SVN r26472
Getting the protocols of an arbitrary type doesn't make sense, so start phasing this out by introducing specialized entry points that do make sense:
- get the inherited protocols of a ProtocolDecl
- get the conforming protocols for an associated type or generic
type parameter
- (already present) ask for the protocols to which a nominal type conforms
Swift SVN r26411
The lit and testsuite changes are hacks to work around the problems with the -enable-source-import model. Some day, we’ll get a “real” mock SDK with compiled overlays so these hacks can go away.
Swift SVN r26327
This lets us tag imported declarations with arbitrary synthesized
protocols. Use it to handle imported raw option sets as well as the
RawRepresentable conformances of enums that come in as structs.
Swift SVN r26298
This flag indicates that internal APIs within the module should be made
available to client code for testing purposes. Currently does nothing.
Not ready for developer consumption yet, ergo a hidden frontend-only flag.
Part of testability (rdar://problem/17732115)
Swift SVN r26292
Before, providing a full SILFunction declaration object with a proper SILType was the only way to link a function. And constructing such a SILFunction declaration by hand using low-level SIL APIs is very annoying and requires a lot of code to be written. This new linkFunction API allows for a lookup using SILDeclRef and essentially performs linking of a SILFunction by its mangled name (assuming this name is unique), which is much easier to invoke. The new API is useful, e.g. when you need to link a well-known function from a standard library.
Swift SVN r26252
Previously, a multi-pattern var/let decl like:
var x = 4, y = 17
would produce two pattern binding decls (one for x=4 one for y=17). This is convenient
in some ways, but is bad for source reproducibility from the ASTs (see, e.g. the improvements
in test/IDE/structure.swift and test/decl/inherit/initializer.swift).
The hardest part of this change was to get parseDeclVar to set up the AST in a way
compatible with our existing assumptions. I ended up with an approach that forms PBDs in
more erroneous cases than before. One downside of this is that we now produce a spurious
"type annotation missing in pattern"
diagnostic in some cases. I'll take care of that in a follow-on patch.
Swift SVN r26224
The deallocating parameter convention is a new convention put on a
non-trivial parameter if the caller function guarantees to the callee
that the parameter has the deallocating bit set in its object header.
This means that retains and releases do not need to be emitted on these
parameters even though they are non-trivial. This helps to solve a bug
in +0 self and makes it trivial for the optimizer to perform
optimizations based on this property.
It is not emitted yet by SILGen and will only be put on the self
argument of Deallocator functions.
Swift SVN r26179
This changes 'if let' conditions to take general refutable patterns, instead of
taking a irrefutable pattern and implicitly matching against an optional.
Where before you might have written:
if let x = foo() {
you now need to write:
if let x? = foo() {
The upshot of this is that you can write anything in an 'if let' that you can
write in a 'case let' in a switch statement, which is pretty general.
To aid with migration, this special cases certain really common patterns like
the above (and any other irrefutable cases, like "if let (a,b) = foo()", and
tells you where to insert the ?. It also special cases type annotations like
"if let x : AnyObject = " since they are no longer allowed.
For transitional purposes, I have intentionally downgraded the most common
diagnostic into a warning instead of an error. This means that you'll get:
t.swift:26:10: warning: condition requires a refutable pattern match; did you mean to match an optional?
if let a = f() {
^
?
I think this is important to stage in, because this is a pretty significant
source breaking change and not everyone internally may want to deal with it
at the same time. I filed 20166013 to remember to upgrade this to an error.
In addition to being a nice user feature, this is a nice cleanup of the guts
of the compiler, since it eliminates the "isConditional()" bit from
PatternBindingDecl, along with the special case logic in the compiler to handle
it (which variously added and removed Optional around these things).
Swift SVN r26150
This introduces a new pattern, spelled "x?" which is sugar for
matching ".Some(x)". It also changes the parser slightly so that
_ (the discard expr) is parsed as a unary expr instead of as an
expr. This allows it to have postfix ? after it, which is important
in pattern contexts to support "case _?:".
Swift SVN r25907
For better consistency with other address-only instruction variants, and to open the door to new exciting existential representations (such as a refcounted boxed representation for ErrorType).
Swift SVN r25902
The contract for LazyResolver::loadAllMembers() was that the caller
would handle actually adding the members, since it was an iterable
declaration context and could centralize that (simple) logic. However,
this fails in the Clang importer in rare but amusing ways when some of
the deferred actions (e.g., finishing a protocol conformance) depend
on having the members already set. The deferred action occurs after
the member list is complete in ClangImporter's loadAllMembers(), but
before its caller actual set the member list, leaving incomplete
conformances. Fixes rdar://problem/18884272.
Swift SVN r25630
...rather than trying to serialize them again, which could lead to attempting
to cross-reference an ExtensionDecl, which can't be done.
rdar://problem/19794141
Swift SVN r25292
Also into a separate file.
Before (swift/Serialization/SerializedModuleLoader.h):
ModuleStatus
SerializedModuleLoader::ValidationInfo
SerializedModuleLoader::ExtendedValidationInfo
SerializedModuleLoader::isSerializedAST
SerializedModuleLoader::validateSerializedAST
After (swift/Serialization/Validation.h):
serialization::Status
serialization::ValidationInfo
serialization::ExtendedValidationInfo
serialization::isSerializedAST
serialization::validateSerializedAST
No functionality change, just a lot of renaming and a bit of reorganizing.
Swift SVN r25226
...so that the debugger has the best possible chance of being able to load
the app properly.
We don't do this for frameworks today because we don't want to leak this
information into the public module; once we have a distinction between
"the module that ships with the framework" and "the module that goes into
the debug info" we can do this for frameworks as well.
Part of rdar://problem/17670778
Swift SVN r25204
Also, erase empty entries from the map once they've been loaded, just in
case we end up registering /more/ buffers later.
No intended functionality change.
Swift SVN r25202
This will have an effect on inlining into thunks.
Currently this flag is set for witness thunks and thunks from function signature optimization.
No change in code generation, yet.
Swift SVN r24998
There were no clients and it leaks information about the developer's system.
After this commit, there should be no full paths present in framework modules.
(App modules may contain search paths for debugging reasons, as well as a
full or relative path to the bridging header.)
Swift SVN r24851
Local type declarations are saved in the source file during parsing,
now serialized as decls. Some of these may be defined in DeclContexts
which aren't Decls and previously weren't serialized. Create four new
record kinds:
* PatternBindingInitializer
* DefaultArgumentInitializer
* AbstractClosureExpr
* TopLevelCodeDecl
These new records are used to only preserve enough information for
remangling in the debugger, and parental context relationships.
Finally, provide a lookup API in the module to search by mangled name.
With the new remangling API, the debugging lifecycle for local types
should be complete.
The extra LOCAL_CONTEXT record will compressed back down in a
subsequent patch.
Swift SVN r24739
with more explicit/semantic conversions in and out.
Using a PointerUnion with overlapping pointer types
is both error-prone and pretty close to illegible.
Swift SVN r24707
There's also a testing option, -serialize-debugging-options, to force this
extra info to be serialized even for library targets. In the long run we'll
probably write out this information for all targets, but strip it out of
the "public module" when a framework is built. (That way it ends up in the
debug info's copy of the module.)
Incidentally, this commit includes the ability to add search paths to the
Clang importer on the fly, which is most of rdar://problem/16347147.
Unfortunately there's no centralized way to add search paths to both Clang
/and/ Swift at the moment.
Part of rdar://problem/17670778
Swift SVN r24545
