This will let the performance inliner inline a function even if the costs are too high.
This attribute is only a hint to the inliner.
If the inliner has other good reasons not to inline a function,
it will ignore this attribute. For example if it is a recursive function (which is
currently not supported by the inliner).
Note that setting the inline threshold to 0 does disable performance inlining at all and in
this case also the @inline(__always) has no effect.
Swift SVN r21452
We don't want typos in import statements to take down the whole REPL, but we
/do/ want the REPL to be honoring fatal errors that effectively take down the
ASTContext.
This doesn't (yet) apply to the real LLDB REPL, which does not use
SourceFileKind::REPL for its input. The right option to test there is
LangOpts.DebuggerSupport, but that's currently being set for Playgrounds as
well. I've filed <rdar://problem/18090611> for LLDB to adjust their input.
Part of <rdar://problem/17994094>
Swift SVN r21383
Introduce an attribute that describes when a given CF type is
toll-free-bridged to an Objective-C class, and which class that
is. Use that information in the type checker to provide the CF <->
Objective-C toll-free-bridged conversions directly, rather than using
the user-defined conversion machinery.
Swift SVN r21376
This disables inlining at the SIL level. LLVM inlining is still enabled. We can
use this to expose one function at the SIL level - which can participate in
dominance based optimizations but which is implemented in terms of a cheap check
and an expensive check (function call) that benefits from LLVM's inlining.
Example:
The inline(late) in the example below prevents inlining of the two checks. We
can now perform dominance based optimizations on isClassOrObjExistential.
Without blocking inlining the optimizations would apply to the sizeof check
only and we would have multiple expensive function calls.
@inline(late)
func isClassOrObjExistential(t: Type) -> Bool{
return sizeof(t) == sizeof(AnyObject) &&
swift_isClassOrObjExistential(t)
}
We do want inlining of this function to happen at the LLVM level because the
first check is constant folded away - IRGen replaces sizeof by constants.
rdar://17961249
Swift SVN r21286
We now have this information during parsing and throw it away during deserialization. This half-baked state works because all non-generic-extension clients only care about the module context.
Swift SVN r20833
Previously, we only retained the module in which a normal protocol
conformance occurred, which meant we either had to go searching for
the appropriate extension (yuck) or do without that information. This
is part of the separating-extension-archetypes work.
Swift SVN r20793
The eventual goal for extensions of generic types is to require them
to specify their generic parameters, e.g.,
extension Array<T> { ... }
rather than today's
extension Array { ... }
Start parsing (optional) generic parameters here, and update the
representation of ExtensionDecl to accomodate this new grammar
production. Aside from the parser changes, there's no intended
functionality change here.
Swift SVN r20682
This adds generic parameters and generic signatures to extension
declarations. The actual generic parameters just mirror what is
available on the extended type; however, it is filled in via extension
validation, which is handled lazily.
This is a NFC step toward decoupling the archetypes of extensions from
the archetypes of the extended types <rdar://problem/16974298>.
Swift SVN r20675
Somewhere--and I forget where--either the LLVM bitcode system or the
OnDiskHashTable implementation depends on 32-bit alignment being preserved.
We had thought that only alignment /from the start of the stream/ mattered,
but it looks like the whole data section has to be 32-bit-aligned.
<rdar://problem/17814086>
Swift SVN r20599
Previously, we were just storing setter accessibility via the accessibility
level on the setter function. However, some Stored properties never actually
have a setter synthesized, which led to the compiler dropping the setter
accessibility at serialization time. Rather than try to hack up something
clever, just store the setter accessibility explicitly in every
AbstractStorageDecl. (We still only serialize it for VarDecls, because
settable SubscriptDecls always have setter functions.)
<rdar://problem/17816530>
Swift SVN r20598
If importing a Clang module fails, we should report that at the location of
the import statement. This doesn't do that fully because it isn't transitive
(if Swift module Foo imports Swift module Bar, which fails to import Clang
module Baz, we don't get an error in user source), but it's a step forward
for the simple cases.
Swift SVN r20575
to emit fixit's when we rename something, e.g.:
t.swift:6:9: error: 'float' has been renamed to Float
var y : float
^~~~~
Float
Adopt this in the stdlib.
Swift SVN r20549
Expose Substitution's archetype, replacement, and conformances only through getters so we can actually assert invariants about them. To start, require replacement types to be materializable in order to catch cases where the type-checker tries to bind type variables to lvalue or inout types, and require the conformance array to match the number of protocol conformances required by the archetype. This exposes some latent bugs in the test suite I've marked as failures for now:
- test/Constraints/overload.swift was quietly suffering from <rdar://problem/17507421>, but we didn't notice because we never tried to codegen it.
- test/SIL/Parser/array_roundtrip.swift doesn't correctly roundtrip substitutions, which I filed as <rdar://problem/17781140>.
Swift SVN r20418
*NOTE* This linkage is different from {Public,Hidden}External in that it has no
extra semantic meaning beyond shared.
The use of this linkage is to ensure that we do not serialize deserialized
shared functions. Those shared functions can always be re-deserialized from the
original module. This prevents a whole class of bugs related to the
creation of module cross references since all references to the shared
item go straight to the original module.
<rdar://problem/17772847>
Swift SVN r20375
"import func Darwin.C.math.hypot" will now work to just import "hypot".
(Since 'Darwin.C.math' is an implicit submodule of 'Darwin',
"import func Darwin.hypot" also works. That's okay.)
<rdar://problem/17272311>
Swift SVN r20356
it indirectly through another pointer from Decl, just embed DeclAttributes
directly into Decl and get rid of the "getMutableAttrs" nonsense.
Swift SVN r20216
We do this so that the swiftmodule file contains all info necessary to
reconstruct the AST for debugging purposes. If the swiftmodule file is copied
into a dSYM bundle, it can (in theory) be used to debug a built app months
later. The header is processed with -frewrite-includes so that it includes
any non-modular content; the user will not have to recreate their project
structure and header maps to reload the AST.
There is some extra complexity here: a target with a bridging header
(such as a unit test target) may depend on another target with a bridging
header (such as an app target). This is a rare case, but one we'd like to
still keep working. However, if both bridging headers import some common.h,
we have a problem, because -frewrite-includes will lose the once-ness
of #import. Therefore, we /also/ store the path, size, and mtime of a
bridging header in the swiftmodule, and prefer to use a regular parse from
the original file if it can be located and hasn't been changed.
<rdar://problem/17688408>
Swift SVN r20128
To answer "did the user specify this, or is it implicit", stick a couple
of is-implicit bits in InfixOperatorDecl, and thread them through
serializaton/deserialization.
Swift SVN r20067
Also:
- merge the test/decl/func/functions_new.swift testcase into test/Sema/immutability.swift,
where the bulk of similar tests are.
- Move the type checking logic for 'dynamic' out of ValidateAttrs into TypeCheckAttrs
- Change the encoding for 'override' to 49 so that stuff vbr's so much more densely :-)
Swift SVN r20006
attribute. As part of this, introduce a new "NotSerialized" flag in Attr.def.
This eliminates a bunch of special case code in the parser and elsewhere for handling
this modifier.
Swift SVN r19997
them to cover all declaration types.
This ensures that we reject attributes on declkinds where they don't make sense. I went so far
as to make the QoI decent when an attribute can only be applied to a single kind of declaration
to make sure the error message says "@IBAction is only valid on 'func' declarations" as well.
This resolves <rdar://problem/17681151> 'dynamic' accepted by the compiler where it shouldn't be
Swift SVN r19982
modifiers and with the func implementations of the operators. This resolves the rest of:
<rdar://problem/17527000> change operator declarations from "operator prefix" to "prefix operator" & make operator a keyword
Swift SVN r19931
eliminating the @'s from them when used on func's. This is progress towards
<rdar://problem/17527000> change operator declarations from "operator prefix" to "prefix operator" & make operator a keyword
This also consolidates rejection of custom operator definitions into one
place and makes it consistent, and adds postfix "?" to the list of rejected
operators.
This also changes the demangler to demangle weak/inout/postfix and related things
without the @.
Swift SVN r19929
This only tackles the protocol case (<rdar://problem/17510790>); it
does not yet generalize to an arbitrary "class" requirement on either
existentials or generics.
Swift SVN r19896
We still have type checker support for user-defined conversions,
because the importer still synthesizes __conversion functions for CF
<-> NS classes.
Swift SVN r19813
This always wrapped a single GenericTypeParamDecl *, and provided no benefit
over just using the decl directly.
No (intended) functionality change.
Swift SVN r19628
