Most of this is in updating the standard library, SDK overlays, and
piles of test cases to use the new names. No surprises here, although
this shows us some potential heuristic tweaks.
There is one substantive compiler change that needs to be factored out
involving synthesizing calls to copyWithZone()/copy(zone:). Aside from
that, there are four failing tests:
Swift :: ClangModules/objc_parse.swift
Swift :: Interpreter/SDK/Foundation_test.swift
Swift :: Interpreter/SDK/archiving_generic_swift_class.swift
Swift :: Interpreter/SDK/objc_currying.swift
due to two independent remaining compiler bugs:
* We're not getting partial ordering between NSCoder's
encode(AnyObject, forKey: String) and NSKeyedArchiver's version of
that method, and
* Dynamic lookup (into AnyObject) doesn't know how to find the new
names. We need the Swift name lookup tables enabled to address this.
All refutable patterns and function parameters marked with 'var'
is now an error.
- Using explicit 'let' keyword on function parameters causes a warning.
- Don't suggest making function parameters mutable
- Remove uses in the standard library
- Update tests
rdar://problem/23378003
There's still work left to do. In terms of next steps, there's still rdar://problem/22126141, which covers removing the 'workaround' overloads for print (that prevent bogus overload resolution failures), as well as providing a decent diagnostic when users invoke print with 'appendNewline'.
Swift SVN r30976
ArraySlice indices now map directly onto the collection it is slicing
and maintains that mapping even after mutations.
Before:
var a = Array(0..<10)
var s = a[5..<10]
s.indices // 0..<5
s[0] = 111
s // [111, 6, 7, 8, 9]
s.removeFirst()
s.indices // 1..<5
After:
var a = Array(0..<10)
var s = a[5..<10]
s.indices // 5..<10
s[5] = 99
s // [99, 6, 7, 8, 9]
s.removeFirst()
s.indices // 6..<10
- Refactor some of the internals of the buffer types to make it easier
to read and understand.
- Add Array, ArraySlice, and ContiguousArray to the test suite at the
RangeReplaceable test entry points, subjecting them to the same tests
as all of our collections.
- Update existing test expectations for the indexing changes.
rdar://problem/21866825
Swift SVN r30840
This makes it clearer that expressions like "foo.myType.init()" are creating new objects, instead of invoking a weird-looking method. The last part of rdar://problem/21375845.
Swift SVN r29375
The rule changes are as follows:
* All functions (introduced with the 'func' keyword) have argument
labels for arguments beyond the first, by default. Methods are no
longer special in this regard.
* The presence of a default argument no longer implies an argument
label.
The actual changes to the parser and printer are fairly simple; the
rest of the noise is updating the standard library, overlays, tests,
etc.
With the standard library, this change is intended to be API neutral:
I've added/removed #'s and _'s as appropriate to keep the user
interface the same. If we want to separately consider using argument
labels for more free functions now that the defaults in the language
have shifted, we can tackle that separately.
Fixes rdar://problem/17218256.
Swift SVN r27704
Retire the old components now that the new ones have passed API review.
<rdar://20406937> covers the migration fallout of this change.
Swift SVN r27092
