Most of this is in updating the standard library, SDK overlays, and
piles of test cases to use the new names. No surprises here, although
this shows us some potential heuristic tweaks.
There is one substantive compiler change that needs to be factored out
involving synthesizing calls to copyWithZone()/copy(zone:). Aside from
that, there are four failing tests:
Swift :: ClangModules/objc_parse.swift
Swift :: Interpreter/SDK/Foundation_test.swift
Swift :: Interpreter/SDK/archiving_generic_swift_class.swift
Swift :: Interpreter/SDK/objc_currying.swift
due to two independent remaining compiler bugs:
* We're not getting partial ordering between NSCoder's
encode(AnyObject, forKey: String) and NSKeyedArchiver's version of
that method, and
* Dynamic lookup (into AnyObject) doesn't know how to find the new
names. We need the Swift name lookup tables enabled to address this.
Another "Don't Crash" commit. We should be able to support this, but
I don't want to track down every place where we assume the number of
parameters doesn't change. (PrintAsObjC is one of them.)
rdar://problem/21313714
Swift SVN r30897
Also, if warning about an accessor that comes from a stored property,
point to the property rather than the (implicit, source-location-less)
accessor decl.
Both of these changes are aimed at improving the presentation in Xcode.
rdar://problem/19927828
Swift SVN r25725
Always perform override checking based on the Swift type
signatures, rather than alternately relying on the Objective-C
selectors. This ensures that we get consistent override behavior for
@objc vs. non-@objc declarations throughout, and we separately make
sure that the Objective-C names line up.
This also allows us to inherit @objc'ness correctly (which didn't
quite work before), including inferring the Objective-C selector/name
(the actual subject of rdar://problem/18998564).
Fixes rdar://problem/18998564.
Swift SVN r25392
Previously, we were using the Objective-C names to help determine
whether a declaration is an override or not. This is broken, because
we should determine overrides based on the Swift rules for
overriding, then (later) check that the Objective-C runtime will see
the same override behavior that the Swift runtime does. Address this
problem, both by taking the Objective-C selector out of the equation
when matching overrides (except for diagnostic purposes) and by
performing better validation of the Objective-C names for the
overriding vs. overridden methods/properties.
The motivating case here (from rdar://problem/18998564) is an
Objective-C initializer:
-(instancetype)initString:(NSString *)string;
When trying to override this in a Swift subclass, one naturally
writes:
override init(string: String)
which implicitly has the selector initWithString:. We ended up in an
unfortunate place where we rejected the override (because the
selectors didn't match) with a crummy diagnostic, but omitting the
"override" would result in a different conflict with the superclass.
Now, we'll treat this as an override and complain that one needs to
rename the method by adding "@objc(initString:)" (with a Fix-It, of
course). This fixes rdar://problem/18998564, but it is not ideal: the
complete solution (covered by rdar://problem/19812955) involves
reworking the dance between override and @objc so that we compute
'override' first (ignoring @objc-ness entirely), and let the
@objc'ness of the overridden declaration both imply @objc for the
overriding declaration and implicitly fix the selector. However, such
a change is too risky right now, hence the radar clone.
Swift SVN r25243
This is required to correctly use the mock SDK when the SDK overlay is
built and tested separately. (Otherwise, the mock SDK might not get
used, because the overlay SDK options would expand from the
%-substitution, appear first on the command line, and shadow the mock
SDK in the search path).
Swift SVN r25185
Most tests were using %swift or similar substitutions, which did not
include the target triple and SDK. The driver was defaulting to the
host OS. Thus, we could not run the tests when the standard library was
not built for OS X.
Swift SVN r24504
Doing so is safe even though we have mock SDK. The include paths for
modules with the same name in the real and mock SDKs are different, and
the module files will be distinct (because they will have a different
hash).
This reduces test runtime on OS X by 30% and brings it under a minute on
a 16-core machine.
This also uncovered some problems with some tests -- even when run for
iOS configurations, some tests would still run with macosx triple. I
fixed the tests where I noticed this issue.
rdar://problem/19125022
Swift SVN r23683
