Introduce Fix-Its to aid migration from selectors spelled as string
literals ("foo:bar:", which is deprecated), as well as from
construction of Selector instances from string literals
(Selector("foo:bar"), which is still acceptable but not recommended),
to the #selector syntax. Jump through some hoops to disambiguate
method references if there are overloads:
fixits.swift:51:7: warning: use of string literal for Objective-C
selectors is deprecated; use '#selector' instead
_ = "overloadedWithInt:" as Selector
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
#selector(Bar.overloaded(_:) as (Bar) -> (Int) -> ())
In the cases where we cannot provide a Fix-It to a #selector
expression, we wrap the string literal in a Selector(...) construction
to suppress the deprecation warning. These are also easily searchable
in the code base.
This also means we're doing more validation of the string literals
that go into Selector, i.e., that they are well-formed selectors and
that we know about some method that is @objc and has that
selector. We'll warn if either is untrue.
Basic implementatation of SE-0021, naming functions with argument
labels. Handle parsing of compound function names in various
unqualified-identifier productions, updating the AST representation of
various expressions from Identifiers to DeclNames. The result doesn't
capture all of the source locations we want; more on that later.
As part of this, remove the parsing code for the "selector-style"
method names, since we now have a replacement. The feature was never
publicized and doesn't make sense in Swift, so zap it outright.
Allow all keywords except for parameter introducers (var/let/inout) to
be argument labels when declaring or calling a
function/initializer/subscript, e.g., this
func touchesMatching(phase: NSTouchPhase, `in` view: NSView?) -> Set<NSTouch>
can now be expressed as
func touchesMatching(phase: NSTouchPhase, in view: NSView?) -> Set<NSTouch>
and the call goes from
event.touchesMatching(phase, `in`: view)
to
event.touchesMatching(phase, in: view)
Fixes [SR-344](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-344) /
rdar://problem/22415674.
Fixes rdar://problem/14776565 (AnyObject lookup for Objective-C
properties with custom getters) and rdar://problem/17184411 (allowing
__attribute__((swift_name("foo"))) to work on anything).
Most of this is in updating the standard library, SDK overlays, and
piles of test cases to use the new names. No surprises here, although
this shows us some potential heuristic tweaks.
There is one substantive compiler change that needs to be factored out
involving synthesizing calls to copyWithZone()/copy(zone:). Aside from
that, there are four failing tests:
Swift :: ClangModules/objc_parse.swift
Swift :: Interpreter/SDK/Foundation_test.swift
Swift :: Interpreter/SDK/archiving_generic_swift_class.swift
Swift :: Interpreter/SDK/objc_currying.swift
due to two independent remaining compiler bugs:
* We're not getting partial ordering between NSCoder's
encode(AnyObject, forKey: String) and NSKeyedArchiver's version of
that method, and
* Dynamic lookup (into AnyObject) doesn't know how to find the new
names. We need the Swift name lookup tables enabled to address this.
member lookup for subscript instead of digging already-looked-up candidates
out of the constraint system. This allows us to produce more specific
diagnostics in failure cases and keeps subscripts inline with other decls
being looked up.
Swift SVN r31586
where we type check the destination first, then apply its type to the source.
This allows us to get diagnostics for assignments that are as good as PBD
initializers and other cases.
Swift SVN r31404
argument list mismatches, and diagnose them with a very specific error when
they occur in member lookups. This fixes
<rdar://problem/22356434> QoI: Missing diagnostic for invalid arguments passed to enum case constructor
where before we'd produce:
ee.swift:5:16: error: type of expression is ambiguous without more context
let list: E = .C(wrongLabel: 0)
~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
now we produce:
ee.swift:1:17: error: incorrect argument label in call (have 'wrongLabel:', expected 'label:')
let list: E = .C(wrongLabel: 0)
^~~~~~~~~~~
label
I think that unresolved member exprs now get good diagnostics in all cases that they have
a contextual type, but of course there are lots more cases where we're not getting a
contextual type.
Swift SVN r31402
The -enable-omit-needless-words option attempts to omit needless words
from method names imported from Clang. Broadly speaking, a word is
needless if it merely restates the type of the corresponding parameter,
using reverse camel-case matching of the type name to the
function/parameter name. The word "With" is also considered needless
if whether follows it is needless, e.g.,
func copyWithZone(zone: NSZone)
gets reduced to
func copy(zone: NSZone)
because "Zone" merely restates type information and the remaining,
trailing "With" is also needless.
There are some special type naming rules for builtin Objective-C types,
e.g.,
id -> "Object"
SEL -> "Selector"
Block pointer types -> "Block"
as well as some very-Cocoa-specific matching rules, e.g., the type
"IndexSet" matches the name "Indexes" or "Indices".
Expect a lot of churn with these heuristics; this is part of
rdar://problem/22232287.
Swift SVN r31178
argument. For now we start with some of the most simple cases: single argument
calls. This dramatically improves the QoI for error messages in argument lists,
typically turning a error+note combo into a single specific error message.
Some minor improvements coming (and also generalizing this to n-ary calls), but it
is nice that all the infrastructure is starting to come together...
Swift SVN r30905
so we complain about 'nil' instead of NilLiteralConvertible. This doesn't have
much effect on the testsuite at the moment, but will when other changes land.
Swift SVN r30873
- Produce more specific diagnostics relating to different kinds of invalid
- add a testcase, nfc
- Reimplement FailureDiagnosis::diagnoseGeneralMemberFailure in terms of
Not including r30787 means that we still generate bogus diagnostics like:
[1, 2, 3].doesntExist(0) // expected-error {{type 'Int2048' does not conform to protocol 'IntegerLiteralConvertible'}}
But it is an existing and separable problem from the issues addressed here.
Swift SVN r30819
r30787 causes our tests to time out; the other commits depend on r30787.
Revert "revert part of my previous patch."
Revert "Produce more specific diagnostics relating to different kinds of invalid"
Revert "add a testcase, nfc"
Revert "- Reimplement FailureDiagnosis::diagnoseGeneralMemberFailure in terms of"
Revert "Fix places in the constraint solver where it would give up once a single "
Swift SVN r30805
member references:
- Use of instance members from types
- Use of type members from instances
- Use of mutating getters.
This surely resolves some radars, but I'll have to dig them out later.
Swift SVN r30796
"unavoidable failure" path, along with Failure::DoesNotHaveNonMutatingMember and
just doing some basic disambiguation in CSDiags.
This provides some benefits:
- Allows us to plug in much more specific diagnostics for the existing "only has
mutating members" diagnostic, including producing notes for why the base expr
isn't mutable (see e.g. test/Sema/immutability.swift diffs).
- Corrects issues where we'd drop full decl name info for selector references.
- Wordsmiths diagnostics to not complain about "values of type Foo.Type" instead
complaining about "type Foo"
- Where before we would diagnose all failures with "has no member named", we now
distinguish between when there is no member, and when you can't use it. When you
can't use it, you get a vauge "cannot use it" diagnostic, but...
- This provides an infrastructure for diagnosing other kinds of problems (e.g.
trying to use a private member or a static member from an instance).
- Improves a number of cases where failed type member constraints would produce uglier
diagnostics than a different constraint failure would.
- Resolves a number of rdars, e.g. (and probably others):
<rdar://problem/20294245> QoI: Error message mentions value rather than key for subscript
Swift SVN r30715
get the same wording, fixing <rdar://problem/21964599> Different diagnostics for the same issue
While I'm in the area, remove some dead code.
Swift SVN r30713
which we have a contextual type that was the failure reason. These are a bit
longer but also more explicit than the previous diagnostics.
Swift SVN r30669
- Have DiagnosticEngine produce "aka" annotations for sugared types.
- Fix the "optional type '@lvalue C?' cannot be used as a boolean; test for '!= nil' instead"
diagnostic to stop printing @lvalue noise.
This addresses:
<rdar://problem/19036351> QoI: Print minimally-desugared 'aka' types like Clang does
Swift SVN r30587
detailed analysis of callees, which give us overload sets in more cases,
producing notes more consistently, and producing much better diagnostics
for the curried cases in test/Constraints/diagnostics.swift.
This also allows us to eliminate getCalleeName, which simplifies things
in CSDiags.
Swift SVN r30491
we can start taking advantage of ambiguously typed subexpressions in CSDiags. We
start by validating the callee function of ApplyExprs, which substantially improves
our abilities to generate precise diagnostics about malformed calls.
This is the minimal introduction of this concept to CSDiags, a lot of refactoring
is yet to come, however, this is enough to resolve:
<rdar://problem/21080030> Bad diagnostic for invalid method call in boolean expression
<rdar://problem/21784170> Incongruous `unexpected trailing closure` error in `init` function which is cast and called without trailing closure.
one of the testcases from:
<rdar://problem/20789423> Unclear diagnostic for multi-statement closure with no return type
and a bunch of other places where we got weird "unexpected trailing closure"
diagnostics that made no sense. As usual, it is two steps forward and one step back,
as this exposed some other weird latent issues like:
<rdar://problem/21900971> QoI: Bogus conversion error in generics case
Swift SVN r30429
Otherwise, people subclassing NSView will accidentally call NSView.print
when they're trying to call Swift.print.
rdar://problem/18309853
Swift SVN r30334
1) Teach resolveImmutableBase about SubscriptExprs that have
resolved the decl that they are referring to. This fixes case where we'd
generate an imprecise diagnostic because we weren't able to find the
result in the ResolvedOverloadSet list (which is because CSApply rewrite
it to a different expr node and the locator can't find it).
2) Change FailureDiagnosis::typeCheckIndependentSubExpression to have a
blacklist of expressions that aren't recursed into, along with rationale
for each node kind, instead of a short white list. This produces more
predictable results, e.g. producing the right diagnostic in
ClangModules/objc_parse.swift
Swift SVN r30118
This is usually a more helpful type than our alternative, 'NSObject', although
it's not Equatable or Hashable. Since pretty much everything from Objective-C
inherits from NSObject, though, keeping the protocol qualifiers is much more
useful from a type-safety perspective.
The particular benefit for this comes with a change to libdispatch's <os/object.h>:
with dispatch types all declaring that they inherit from NSObjectProtocol, the
canonical form of the imported 'dispatch_queue_t' is now just a simple protocol
reference. That's type-safe as above, but is also a type that can be extended.
rdar://problem/16213421
Swift SVN r30100
argument list for a CallExpr instead of matching a gang of typevartypes against them.
This allows us to produce better matches in some cases.
Swift SVN r30065
facilities used by operators etc. This required a bunch of changes to make
the diagnostics changes strictly an improvement:
- Teach the new path about calls to TypeExprs.
- Teach evaluateCloseness some simple things about varargs.
- Make the generic diagnosis logic produce a better error when there is
exactly one match.
Overall, the resultant diagnostics are a step forward: we now produce candidate
set notes more uniformly, and the messages about some existing ones are
more specific. This is just another stepping stone towards progress though.
Swift SVN r30057
Per discussion, there are certain times where our APIs really want you to use
the performSelector family of methods (e.g. when the framework hands you a selector
and expects you to call it upon completion).
Although the methods still aren't type-safe, we are at least making the result
Unmanaged so that you're forced to think about whether it's +1 or +0 before you
use it, and so that the compiler doesn't accidentally try to retain a non-object
pointer.
This commit also removes the blocks on the makeObjectsPerformSelector... methods,
but Foundation plans to add NS_SWIFT_UNAVAILABLE there (see rdar://problem/21150180).
rdar://problem/21150277
Swift SVN r30044
These classes don't show up well in generated headers (rdar://problem/20855568),
can't actually be allocated from Objective-C (rdar://problem/17184317), and
make the story of "what is exposed to Objective-C" more complicated. Better
to just disallow them.
All classes are still "id-compatible" in that they can be converted to
AnyObject and passed to Objective-C, they secretly implement NSObjectProtocol
(via our SwiftObject root class), and their members can still be individually
exposed to Objective-C.
The frontend flag -disable-objc-attr-requires-foundation-module will disable
this requirement as well, which is still necessary for both the standard
library and a variety of tests I didn't feel like transforming.
Swift SVN r29760
A method has "__" prepended to its basename; an initializer has "__"
prepended to its first argument.
There are a few holes here involving no-argument initializers and factory
methods, but hopefully we won't need to remap those with swift_private anyway.
More of rdar://problem/20070465
Swift SVN r29429
This makes it clearer that expressions like "foo.myType.init()" are creating new objects, instead of invoking a weird-looking method. The last part of rdar://problem/21375845.
Swift SVN r29375
