Use the keywords `_Nullable`, `_Nonnull`, and `_Null_unspecified`
instead of the older compatibility forms `__nullable`, `__nonnull`, and
`__null_unspecified`.
Part of rdar://problem/23614638
These classes don't show up well in generated headers (rdar://problem/20855568),
can't actually be allocated from Objective-C (rdar://problem/17184317), and
make the story of "what is exposed to Objective-C" more complicated. Better
to just disallow them.
All classes are still "id-compatible" in that they can be converted to
AnyObject and passed to Objective-C, they secretly implement NSObjectProtocol
(via our SwiftObject root class), and their members can still be individually
exposed to Objective-C.
The frontend flag -disable-objc-attr-requires-foundation-module will disable
this requirement as well, which is still necessary for both the standard
library and a variety of tests I didn't feel like transforming.
Swift SVN r29760
This is required to correctly use the mock SDK when the SDK overlay is
built and tested separately. (Otherwise, the mock SDK might not get
used, because the overlay SDK options would expand from the
%-substitution, appear first on the command line, and shadow the mock
SDK in the search path).
Swift SVN r25185
Most tests were using %swift or similar substitutions, which did not
include the target triple and SDK. The driver was defaulting to the
host OS. Thus, we could not run the tests when the standard library was
not built for OS X.
Swift SVN r24504
Doing so is safe even though we have mock SDK. The include paths for
modules with the same name in the real and mock SDKs are different, and
the module files will be distinct (because they will have a different
hash).
This reduces test runtime on OS X by 30% and brings it under a minute on
a 16-core machine.
This also uncovered some problems with some tests -- even when run for
iOS configurations, some tests would still run with macosx triple. I
fixed the tests where I noticed this issue.
rdar://problem/19125022
Swift SVN r23683
There are still problems with nested classes:
- They're much more likely to have colliding compile-time names
(since the outer class's name is dropped).
- They're only picked up if the outer class is also @objc.
But at least now we won't generate invalid Objective-C. Unless the inner
classes have the same name.
rdar://problem/18187877
Swift SVN r21677
The upshot of this is that internal decls in an app target will be in the
generated header but internal decls in a framework target will not. This
is important since the generated header is part of a framework's public
interface. Users always have the option to add members via category to an
internal framework type they need to use from Objective-C, or to write the
@interface themselves if the entire type is missing. Only internal protocols
are left out by this.
The presence of the bridging header isn't a /perfect/ way to decide this,
but it's close enough. In an app target without a bridging header, it's
unlikely that there will be ObjC sources depending on the generated header.
Swift SVN r19763
- Category names weren't unique.
- We were using an attribute to detect if something was a Swift category,
but attributes can't be used on categories.
- The test that this was all working was failing in a way that wasn't caught.
To solve these problems:
- We're using a macro to generate category names based on __LINE__ in addition
to the current module.
- The importer uses the macro to detect that the category comes from Swift
(no attribute needed).
- The test now has a deliberate error for -verify to catch.
<rdar://problem/17342287&17538553>
Swift SVN r19479
Because extensions don't have any identity we can check against, we can't
tell when we see an Objective-C category if it came from a Swift extension.
Change PrintAsObjC to mark all such categories with SWIFT_EXTENSION, and
just skip them unilaterally when importing Objective-C code.
Also, actually give Swift extensions a name when writing them as Objective-C
categories. Previously, they were nameless categories ("class extensions"),
but methods in a class extension are supposed to be implemented in the class's
main @implementation, so people were getting unexpected warnings about missing
implementations.
<rdar://problem/17342287>
Swift SVN r19116
...and just outright import the bridging header if that's what's needed.
This means we'll use @class and @protocol whenever we're just using a class
or protocol in a type, but still import the enclosing module when we need
the definition. We'll also fall back to the module (or bridging header) if
we need something /else/ from C: a struct, a typedef, whatever.
<rdar://problem/17183425>
Swift SVN r18795
