I can't get this to reproduce with anything more self-contained,
unfortunately: it seems that IntegerLiteralConvertible is the interesting
protocol, and the type has to come from the standard library.
Swift SVN r25294
...rather than trying to serialize them again, which could lead to attempting
to cross-reference an ExtensionDecl, which can't be done.
rdar://problem/19794141
Swift SVN r25292
This will have an effect on inlining into thunks.
Currently this flag is set for witness thunks and thunks from function signature optimization.
No change in code generation, yet.
Swift SVN r24998
implemented with Builtin.Word
The definition Swift.Int is becoming heavily platform-dependent, please
avoid using it in SIL and IR tests unless Swift.Int is being tested and
can't be replaced with a fixed-width type (e.g., Int32).
Swift SVN r24720
This exposes a problem with the sil_vtable parser, that it can't differentiate overloads (rdar://problem/19572342), and breaks a test that exposes the fact we don't reabstract overrides that have a less abstract native calling convention than their base (rdar://problem/19572664).
Swift SVN r24667
Rather than use pre-generated swiftmodule files, generate an empty module
and then replace the target triple embedded in it. This unfortunately
necessitates an external script beacuse typical command-line tools are not
meant for operating on binary files.
Swift SVN r24556
Refuse to load a module if it was compiled for a different architecture or
OS, or if its minimum deployment target is newer than the current target.
Additionally, provide the target triple as part of pre-loading validation
for clients who care (like LLDB).
Part of rdar://problem/17670778
Swift SVN r24469
rdar://problem/17198298
- Allow 'static' in protocol property and func requirements, but not 'class'.
- Allow 'static' methods in classes - they are 'class final'.
- Only allow 'class' methods in classes (or extensions of classes)
- Remove now unneeded diagnostics related to finding 'static' in previously banned places.
- Update relevant diagnostics to make the new rules clear.
Swift SVN r24260
optional callback; retrofit existing implementations.
There's a lot of unpleasant traffic in raw pointers here
which I'm going to try to clean up.
Swift SVN r24123
Verify that witness_method instructions with a lookup type that is an
opened archetype have the optional operand that represents the
open_existential instruction.
I ran into this working supporting substitution of existential types in
mandatory inlining (rdar://problem/17769717).
Swift SVN r23665
Include a mapping from Objective-C selectors to the @objc methods that
produce Objective-c methods with those selectors. Use this to lazily
populate the Objective-C method lookup tables in each class. This makes
@objc override checking work across Swift modules, which is part of
rdar://problem/18391046.
Note that we use a single, unified selector table, both because it is
simpler and because it makes global queries ("is there any method with
the given selector?") easier.
Swift SVN r23214
This is a type that has ownership of a reference while allowing access to the
spare bits inside the pointer, but which can also safely hold an ObjC tagged pointer
reference (with no spare bits of course). It additionally blesses one
Foundation-coordinated bit with the meaning of "has swift refcounting" in order
to get a faster short-circuit to native refcounting. It supports the following
builtin operations:
- Builtin.castToBridgeObject<T>(ref: T, bits: Builtin.Word) ->
Builtin.BridgeObject
Creates a BridgeObject that contains the bitwise-OR of the bit patterns of
"ref" and "bits". It is the user's responsibility to ensure "bits" doesn't
interfere with the reference identity of the resulting value. In other words,
it is undefined behavior unless:
castReferenceFromBridgeObject(castToBridgeObject(ref, bits)) === ref
This means "bits" must be zero if "ref" is a tagged pointer. If "ref" is a real
object pointer, "bits" must not have any non-spare bits set (unless they're
already set in the pointer value). The native discriminator bit may only be set
if the object is Swift-refcounted.
- Builtin.castReferenceFromBridgeObject<T>(bo: Builtin.BridgeObject) -> T
Extracts the reference from a BridgeObject.
- Builtin.castBitPatternFromBridgeObject(bo: Builtin.BridgeObject) -> Builtin.Word
Presents the bit pattern of a BridgeObject as a Word.
BridgeObject's bits are set up as follows on the various platforms:
i386, armv7:
No ObjC tagged pointers
Swift native refcounting flag bit: 0x0000_0001
Other available spare bits: 0x0000_0002
x86_64:
Reserved for ObjC tagged pointers: 0x8000_0000_0000_0001
Swift native refcounting flag bit: 0x0000_0000_0000_0002
Other available spare bits: 0x7F00_0000_0000_0004
arm64:
Reserved for ObjC tagged pointers: 0x8000_0000_0000_0000
Swift native refcounting flag bit: 0x4000_0000_0000_0000
Other available spare bits: 0x3F00_0000_0000_0007
TODO: BridgeObject doesn't present any extra inhabitants. It ought to at least provide null as an extra inhabitant for Optional.
Swift SVN r22880
This allows making global addressors fragile (They use globalinit_{token,func} for initialization of globals).
It has no noticable performance impact on our benchmarks, but it removes an ugly hack which explicitly
prevented addressors from being fragile.
Swift SVN r22812
This allows making global addressors fragile (They use globalinit_{token,func} for initialization of globals).
It has no noticable performance impact on our benchmarks, but it removes an ugly hack which explicitly
prevented addressors from being fragile.
Swift SVN r22795
Modeling builtins as first-class function values doesn't really make sense because there's no real function value to emit, and modeling them this way complicates passes that work with builtins because they have to invent function types for builtin invocations. It's much more straightforward to have a single instruction that references the builtin by ID, along with the type information for the necessary values, type parameters, and results, so add a new "builtin" instruction that directly represents a builtin invocation. NFC yet.
Swift SVN r22690
Now the SILLinkage for functions and global variables is according to the swift visibility (private, internal or public).
In addition, the fact whether a function or global variable is considered as fragile, is kept in a separate flag at SIL level.
Previously the linkage was used for this (e.g. no inlining of less visible functions to more visible functions). But it had no effect,
because everything was public anyway.
For now this isFragile-flag is set for public transparent functions and for everything if a module is compiled with -sil-serialize-all,
i.e. for the stdlib.
For details see <rdar://problem/18201785> Set SILLinkage correctly and better handling of fragile functions.
The benefits of this change are:
*) Enable to eliminate unused private and internal functions
*) It should be possible now to use private in the stdlib
*) The symbol linkage is as one would expect (previously almost all symbols were public).
More details:
Specializations from fragile functions (e.g. from the stdlib) now get linkonce_odr,default
linkage instead of linkonce_odr,hidden, i.e. they have public visibility.
The reason is: if such a function is called from another fragile function (in the same module),
then it has to be visible from a third module, in case the fragile caller is inlined but not
the specialized function.
I had to update lots of test files, because many CHECK-LABEL lines include the linkage, which has changed.
The -sil-serialize-all option is now handled at SILGen and not at the Serializer.
This means that test files in sil format which are compiled with -sil-serialize-all
must have the [fragile] attribute set for all functions and globals.
The -disable-access-control option doesn't help anymore if the accessed module is not compiled
with -sil-serialize-all, because the linker will complain about unresolved symbols.
A final note: I tried to consider all the implications of this change, but it's not a low-risk change.
If you have any comments, please let me know.
Swift SVN r22215
This is necessary to be able to properly stash values with nontrivial lowerings, such as metatypes and functions, inside existential containers. Modify SILGen to lower values to the proper abstraction level before storing them in an existential container. Part of the fix for rdar://problem/18189508, though runtime problems still remain when trying to actually dynamicCast out a metatype from an Any container.
Swift SVN r21830
This will let the performance inliner inline a function even if the costs are too high.
This attribute is only a hint to the inliner.
If the inliner has other good reasons not to inline a function,
it will ignore this attribute. For example if it is a recursive function (which is
currently not supported by the inliner).
Note that setting the inline threshold to 0 does disable performance inlining at all and in
this case also the @inline(__always) has no effect.
Swift SVN r21452
This disables inlining at the SIL level. LLVM inlining is still enabled. We can
use this to expose one function at the SIL level - which can participate in
dominance based optimizations but which is implemented in terms of a cheap check
and an expensive check (function call) that benefits from LLVM's inlining.
Example:
The inline(late) in the example below prevents inlining of the two checks. We
can now perform dominance based optimizations on isClassOrObjExistential.
Without blocking inlining the optimizations would apply to the sizeof check
only and we would have multiple expensive function calls.
@inline(late)
func isClassOrObjExistential(t: Type) -> Bool{
return sizeof(t) == sizeof(AnyObject) &&
swift_isClassOrObjExistential(t)
}
We do want inlining of this function to happen at the LLVM level because the
first check is constant folded away - IRGen replaces sizeof by constants.
rdar://17961249
Swift SVN r21286
I am trying to enable a new ARC optimizer feature that is forcing me to
debug a test case that is affected by inlining of initializers. Plus, being
able to selectively disable inlining of the initializers is a useful
feature in general.
Swift SVN r20427
A while back we decided to require @IBOutlets to be optional (via ! or
?); we got as far as ripping out the implicit !'ification of
@IBOutlets, but never added the diagnostic. Diagnose this restriction
with Fix-Its.
Swift SVN r19981
enforce its own little constraints. The type checker isn't using it for
anything, and it is just clutter.
This resolves <rdar://problem/16656024> Remove @assignment from operator implementations
Swift SVN r19960
modifiers and with the func implementations of the operators. This resolves the rest of:
<rdar://problem/17527000> change operator declarations from "operator prefix" to "prefix operator" & make operator a keyword
Swift SVN r19931
eliminating the @'s from them when used on func's. This is progress towards
<rdar://problem/17527000> change operator declarations from "operator prefix" to "prefix operator" & make operator a keyword
This also consolidates rejection of custom operator definitions into one
place and makes it consistent, and adds postfix "?" to the list of rejected
operators.
This also changes the demangler to demangle weak/inout/postfix and related things
without the @.
Swift SVN r19929
This only tackles the protocol case (<rdar://problem/17510790>); it
does not yet generalize to an arbitrary "class" requirement on either
existentials or generics.
Swift SVN r19896
Mechanically add "Type" to the end of any protocol names that don't end
in "Type," "ible," or "able." Also, drop "Type" from the end of any
associated type names, except for those of the *LiteralConvertible
protocols.
There are obvious improvements to make in some of these names, which can
be handled with separate commits.
Fixes <rdar://problem/17165920> Protocols `Integer` etc should get
uglier names.
Swift SVN r19883
