This standardizes processing of callees in invalid applyexprs, eliminating
bogus diagnostics like:
t.swift:6:2: error: cannot invoke closure of type '() -> _' with an argument list of type '()'
we now properly diagnose the example in closure/closures.swift as ambiguous,
but don't do a particularly good job of saying why. That is to follow.
the code to be actually readable since it unnests it greatly), and call it
both before and after argument type validation. This allows us to capture
many more structural errors than before, leading to much better diagnostics
in a lot of cases. This also fixes the specific regressions introduced by
96a1e96.
overloaded argument list mismatches. We printed them in simple cases
due to "Failure" detecting them in trivial situations. Instead of
doing that, let CSDiags do it, which allows us to pick things out of
overload sets and handle the more complex cases well.
This is a progression across the board except for a couple of cases
where we now produce "cannot convert value of type 'whatever' to
expected argument type '(arglist)'", this is a known issue that I'll
fix in a subsequent commit.
Revert "Make function parameters and refutable patterns always
immutable"
This reverts commit 8f2fbdc93a.
Once we have finally merged master into the Swift 2.2 branch to be, we
should revert this commit to turn the errors back on for Swift 3.0.
All refutable patterns and function parameters marked with 'var'
is now an error.
- Using explicit 'let' keyword on function parameters causes a warning.
- Don't suggest making function parameters mutable
- Remove uses in the standard library
- Update tests
rdar://problem/23378003
call expression onto a callee when it was a binary expression. Doing this
requires improving the diagnostics for when the contextual result type is
incompatible with all candidates, but that is general goodness all around.
This fixes:
<rdar://problem/22333090> QoI: Propagate contextual information in a call to operands
and improves a number of diagnostics where the problem is that an operator
is used in a context that expects a type that it cannot produce.
Swift SVN r31891
- Enhance the branch new argument label overload diagnostic to just
print the argument labels that are the problem, instead of printing
the types inferred at the argument context. This can lead to confusion
particularly when an argument label is missing. For example before:
error: argument labels '(Int)' do not match any available overloads
note: overloads for 'TestOverloadSets.init' exist with these partially matching parameter lists: (a: Z0), (value: Int), (value: Double)
after:
error: argument labels '(_:)' do not match any available overloads
note: overloads for 'TestOverloadSets.init' exist with these partially matching parameter lists: (a: Z0), (value: Int), (value: Double)
Second, fix <rdar://problem/22451001> QoI: incorrect diagnostic when argument to print has the wrong type
by specifically diagnosing the problem when you pass in an argument to a nullary function. Before:
error: cannot convert value of type 'Int' to expected argument type '()'
after:
error: argument passed to call that takes no arguments
print(r22451001(5))
^
Swift SVN r31795
<rdar://problem/22333281> QoI: improve diagnostic when contextual type of closure disagrees with arguments
In the common case where someone doesn't care about the argument
list to a closure, we now generate a tailored error message with a
fixit to introduce the necessary "_,_ in " nonsense at the start
of the closure. IMO ideally we wouldn't require this, but until we
fix that type checker issue, we should at least give people the
obvious fix.
Swift SVN r31720
expr diagnosis stuff, giving us much better diagnostics on the cases in
expr/closure/closures.swift. This is part #2 of resolving
<rdar://problem/22333281> QoI: improve diagnostic when contextual type of closure disagrees with arguments
Swift SVN r31717
specifies some # of arguments but the closureexpr itself disagrees. This is
step #1 to resolving
<rdar://problem/22333281> QoI: improve diagnostic when contextual type of closure disagrees with arguments
Swift SVN r31715
Have ClosureExpr::hasSingleExpressionBody() return true even after the
closure has been coerced to return Void, i.e., { E } has been rewritten
as { E; () }. This fixes some implicit-self diagnostics, and probably
others.
Revision to r31654 for 22441425.
Swift SVN r31665
we process contextual constraints when producing diagnostic. Formerly,
we would aggressively drop contextual type information on the floor under
the idea that it would reduce constraints on the system and make it more
likely to be solvable. However, this also has the downside of introducing
ambiguity into the system, and some expr nodes (notably closures) cannot
usually be solved without that contextual information.
In the new model, expr diagnostics are expected to handle the fact that
contextual information may be present, and bail out without diagnosing an
error if that is the case. This gets us more information into closures,
allowing more specific return type information, e.g. in the case in
test/expr/closure/closures.swift.
This approach also produces more correct diagnostics in a bunch of other
cases as well, e.g.:
- var c = [:] // expected-error {{type '[_ : _]' does not conform to protocol 'DictionaryLiteralConvertible'}}
+ var c = [:] // expected-error {{expression type '[_ : _]' is ambiguous without more context}}
and the examples in test/stmt/foreach.swift, test/expr/cast/as_coerce.swift,
test/expr/cast/array_iteration.swift, etc.
That said, this another two steps forward, one back thing. Because we
don't handle propagating sametype constraints from results of calls to their
arguments, we regress a couple of (admittedly weird) cases. This is now
tracked by:
<rdar://problem/22333090> QoI: Propagate contextual information in a call to operands
There is also the one-off narrow case tracked by:
<rdar://problem/22333281> QoI: improve diagnostic when contextual type of closure disagrees with arguments
Swift SVN r31319
the regressions that r31105 introduced in the validation tests, as well as fixing a number
of other validation tests as well.
Introduce a new UnresolvedType to the type system, and have CSDiags start to use it
as a way to get more type information out of incorrect subexpressions. UnresolvedType
generally just propagates around the type system like a type variable:
- it magically conforms to all protocols
- it CSGens as an unconstrained type variable.
- it ASTPrints as _, just like a type variable.
The major difference is that UnresolvedType can be used outside the context of a
ConstraintSystem, which is useful for CSGen since it sets up several of them to
diagnose subexpressions w.r.t. their types.
For now, our use of this is extremely limited: when a closureexpr has no contextual
type available and its parameters are invalid, we wipe them out with UnresolvedType
(instead of the previous nulltype dance) to get ambiguities later on.
We also introduce a new FreeTypeVariableBinding::UnresolvedType approach for
constraint solving (and use this only in one place in CSDiags so far, to resolve
the callee of a CallExpr) which solves a system and rewrites any leftover type
variables as UnresolvedTypes. This allows us to get more precise information out,
for example, diagnosing:
func r22162441(lines: [String]) {
lines.map { line in line.fooBar() }
}
with: value of type 'String' has no member 'fooBar'
instead of: type of expression is ambiguous without more context
This improves a number of other diagnostics as well, but is just the infrastructural
stepping stone for greater things.
Swift SVN r31130
as a way to get more type information out of incorrect subexpressions. UnresolvedType
generally just propagates around the type system like a type variable:
- it magically conforms to all protocols
- it CSGens as an unconstrained type variable.
- it ASTPrints as _, just like a type variable.
The major difference is that UnresolvedType can be used outside the context of a
ConstraintSystem, which is useful for CSGen since it sets up several of them to
diagnose subexpressions w.r.t. their types.
For now, our use of this is extremely limited: when a closureexpr has no contextual
type available and its parameters are invalid, we wipe them out with UnresolvedType
(instead of the previous nulltype dance) to get ambiguities later on.
We also introduce a new FreeTypeVariableBinding::UnresolvedType approach for
constraint solving (and use this only in one place in CSDiags so far, to resolve
the callee of a CallExpr) which solves a system and rewrites any leftover type
variables as UnresolvedTypes. This allows us to get more precise information out,
for example, diagnosing:
func r22162441(lines: [String]) {
lines.map { line in line.fooBar() }
}
with: value of type 'String' has no member 'fooBar'
instead of: type of expression is ambiguous without more context
This improves a number of other diagnostics as well, but is just the infrastructural
stepping stone for greater things.
Swift SVN r31105
explicitly written and disagree with context, and when context provides a
non-explicitly written type that disagrees with the body of the closure.
Swift SVN r30984
using it to improve closure diagnostics by inferring the types of otherwise
untyped closure paramdecls from this context information. This
resolves:
<rdar://problem/20371273> Type errors inside anonymous functions don't provide enough information
producing
error: binary operator '==' cannot be applied to operands of type 'Int' and 'UInt'
note: overloads for '==' exist with these partially matching parameter lists: (UInt, UInt), (Int, Int)
and:
<rdar://problem/20978044> QoI: Poor diagnostic when using an incorrect tuple element in a closure
producing:
error: value of tuple type '(Int, Int)' has no member '2'
and probably a lot more. We're still limited from getting things like "foo.map {...}" because
we're not doing type subsitutions from the base into the protocol extension member.
Swift SVN r30971
as a proper error, and change it to not be incorrect. Multi-statement
closures *only* need a return type if they cannot be inferred.
This fixes:
<rdar://problem/22086634> "multi-statement closures require an explicit return type" should be an error not a note
Swift SVN r30937
down to call argument lists that have more than one operand (heavily leveraging
"computeTupleShuffle"). This resolves a great number of QoI radars, including
things like:
<rdar://problem/19981782> QoI: poor diagnostic for call to memcmp with UInt length parameter
where we used to produce:
error: cannot invoke 'memcmp' with an argument list of type '([UInt8], [UInt8], UInt)'
return memcmp(left, right, UInt(left.count)) == 0
^
note: expected an argument list of type '(UnsafePointer<Void>, UnsafePointer<Void>, Int)'
but now we produce:
error: cannot convert value of type 'UInt' to expected argument type 'Int'
return memcmp(left, right, UInt(left.count)) == 0
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
which is more "to the point"
Swift SVN r30930
argument. For now we start with some of the most simple cases: single argument
calls. This dramatically improves the QoI for error messages in argument lists,
typically turning a error+note combo into a single specific error message.
Some minor improvements coming (and also generalizing this to n-ary calls), but it
is nice that all the infrastructure is starting to come together...
Swift SVN r30905
which we have a contextual type that was the failure reason. These are a bit
longer but also more explicit than the previous diagnostics.
Swift SVN r30669
conversion failures, making a bunch of diagnostics more specific and useful.
UnavoidableFailures can be very helpful, but they can also be the first constraint
failure that the system happened to come across... which is not always the most
meaningful one. CSDiag's expr processing machinery has a generally better way of
narrowing down which ones make the most sense.
Swift SVN r30647
