Use -[NSSet copyWithZone:] instead.
CFSetCreateCopy() is buggy in OSes that ship today: it copies the set
unconditionally, even if it is immutable, resulting in O(n) bridging.
Swift SVN r27733
Use -[NSDictionary copyWithZone:] instead.
CFDictionaryCreateCopy() is buggy in OSes that ship today: it copies the
dictionary unconditionally, even if it is immutable, resulting in O(n)
bridging.
Swift SVN r27732
Enable checking for uses of potentially unavailable APIs. There is
a frontend option to disable it: -disable-availability-checking.
This commit updates the SDK overlays with @availability() annotations for the
declarations where the overlay refers to potentially unavailable APIs. It also changes
several tests that refer to potentially unavailable APIs to use either #available()
or @availability annotations.
Swift SVN r27272
Retire the old components now that the new ones have passed API review.
<rdar://20406937> covers the migration fallout of this change.
Swift SVN r27092
Retire the old components now that the new ones have passed API review.
<rdar://20406937> covers the migration fallout of this change.
Swift SVN r27081
Simplify the observation evaluation in the ErrorType race test by using evaluateObservationsAllEqual, and run the test for real. Apparently round-trip NSString and NSDictionary bridging doesn't produce a stable object, so use valueForKey as a hack to sidestep bridging so we can verify that the identities of the bridged domain and code aren't racy.
Swift SVN r27003
Atomically initialize and load the NSError bridging fields within an ErrorType box so that we do the right thing when two threads concurrently coerce the box to NSError.
Swift SVN r26996
Retire the old components now that the new ones have passed API review.
<rdar://20406937> covers the migration fallout of this change.
Swift SVN r26904
requires pushing the types out. The only interesting one is this diff:
- var (e,f,g:(),h) = MRV()
+ var (e,f,g,h) : (Int, Float, (), Double) = MRV()
... where the type annotation is required to silence the warning about "void type
may be unexpected". This seems perfectly reasonable to me.
Swift SVN r26161
This changes 'if let' conditions to take general refutable patterns, instead of
taking a irrefutable pattern and implicitly matching against an optional.
Where before you might have written:
if let x = foo() {
you now need to write:
if let x? = foo() {
The upshot of this is that you can write anything in an 'if let' that you can
write in a 'case let' in a switch statement, which is pretty general.
To aid with migration, this special cases certain really common patterns like
the above (and any other irrefutable cases, like "if let (a,b) = foo()", and
tells you where to insert the ?. It also special cases type annotations like
"if let x : AnyObject = " since they are no longer allowed.
For transitional purposes, I have intentionally downgraded the most common
diagnostic into a warning instead of an error. This means that you'll get:
t.swift:26:10: warning: condition requires a refutable pattern match; did you mean to match an optional?
if let a = f() {
^
?
I think this is important to stage in, because this is a pretty significant
source breaking change and not everyone internally may want to deal with it
at the same time. I filed 20166013 to remember to upgrade this to an error.
In addition to being a nice user feature, this is a nice cleanup of the guts
of the compiler, since it eliminates the "isConditional()" bit from
PatternBindingDecl, along with the special case logic in the compiler to handle
it (which variously added and removed Optional around these things).
Swift SVN r26150
