We parse `~Copyable` in an inheritance clause of enum and
struct decls as a synonym for the `@_moveOnly` attribute
being added to that decl. This completely side-steps the
additional infrastructure for generalized suppressed
conformances in favor of a minimal solution. One benefit of
this minimal solution is that it doesn't risk introducing
any back-compat issues with older compilers or stdlibs.
The trade-off is that we're more committed to supporting
`@_moveOnly` in compiled modules in the future. In fact,
this change does not deprecate `@_moveOnly` in any way.
resolves rdar://106775103
Cursor info only cares about the `doneParsing` callback and not about all the `complete` functions that are now defined in `CodeCompletionCallbacks`. To make the design clearer, split `IDEInspectionCallbacks`.
rdar://105120332
Currently, this is staged in as `_forget`,
as part of SE-390. It can only be used on
`self` for a move-only type within a consuming
method or accessor. There are other rules, see
Sema for the details.
A `forget self` really just consumes self and
performs memberwise destruction of its data.
Thus, the current expansion of this statement
just reuses what we inject into the end of a
deinit.
Parsing of `forget` is "contextual".
By contextual I mean that we do lookahead to
the next token and see if it's identifier-like.
If so, then we parse it as the `forget` statement.
Otherwise, we parse it as though "forget" is an
identifier as part of some expression.
This way, we won't introduce a source break for
people who wrote code that calls a forget
function.
This should make it seamless to change it from
`_forget` to `forget` in the future.
resolves rdar://105795731
And adjust contextual parameter modifier parsing in general to be more
properly contextual, so we don't have to reserve `__shared` or `__owned`,
or their successor spellings, as argument labels anymore.
Extend handling of incomplete multi-line string literals during input in
REPL to also cover raw multi-line strings.
Fixes#52840 and apple/llvm-project#4628
Introduce SingleValueStmtExpr, which allows the
embedding of a statement in an expression context.
This then allows us to parse and type-check `if`
and `switch` statements as expressions, gated
behind the `IfSwitchExpression` experimental
feature for now. In the future,
SingleValueStmtExpr could also be used for e.g
`do` expressions.
For now, only single expression branches are
supported for producing a value from an
`if`/`switch` expression, and each branch is
type-checked independently. A multi-statement
branch may only appear if it ends with a `throw`,
and it may not `break`, `continue`, or `return`.
The placement of `if`/`switch` expressions is also
currently limited by a syntactic use diagnostic.
Currently they're only allowed in bindings,
assignments, throws, and returns. But this could
be lifted in the future if desired.
Use the name mangling scheme we've devised for macro expansions to
back the implementation of the macro expansion context's
`getUniqueName` operation. This way, we guarantee that the names
provided by macro expansions don't conflict, as well as making them
demangleable so we can determine what introduced the names.
The attached and freestanding macro attributes use the same parsing
logic and representation, so generalize the "attached" attribute into
a more general "macro role" attribute.
call it from parseExpandedAttributeList.
In the future, it would be much better to requestify computing exportedSourceFile,
so the new Swift parser is invoked on-demand rather than making sure it's
invoked in all of the appropriate parser entry points.
Describe attached macros with the `@attached` attribute, providing the
macro role and affected names as arguments to the macro. The form of
this macro will remain the same as it gains other kinds of attached
macro roles beyond "accessor".
Remove the "accessors" role from `@declaration`, which will be going
away.
Once an accessor macro has produced accessors, parse them and wire them
into the AST so the rest of the compiler will see them. First
end-to-end test case!
Add support for freestanding declaration macros.
- Parse `@declaration` attribute.
- Type check and expand `MacroExpansionDecl`.
Known issues:
- Generic macros are not yet handled.
- Expansion does not work when the parent decl context is `BraceStmt`. Need to parse freestanding declaration macro expansions in `BraceStmt` as `MacroExpansionDecl`, and add expanded decls to name lookup.
Always parse macro expansions, regardless of language mode, and
eliminate the fallback path for very, very, very old object literals
like `#Color`. Instead, check for the feature flag for macro
declaration and at macro expansion time, since this is a semantic
restriction.
While here, refactor things so the vast majority of the macro-handling
logic still applies even if the Swift Swift parser is disabled. Only
attempts to expand the macro will fail. This allows us to enable the
macro-diagnostics test everywhere.
The "local context" was only used to prevent parsing of closures in a
non-local context, and also string interpolations because they are
similar-ish to closures. However, this isn't something a parser should
decide, so remove this special-case semantic check from the parser and
eliminate the notion of "local context" entirely.
The parser no longer sets local discriminators, and this function is
currently only responsible for adding local type declarations to the
source file. Rename it and remove most of the former callers so it
does just that.
The lexer will be responsible for knowing whether we have a code completion token, everything else will also work for other IDE inspection features.
The changes start to really make sense once I rename CodeCompletion -> IDEInspection in a lot of places.
In the Swift grammar, the top-level of a source file is a mix of three
different kinds of "items": declarations, statements, and expressions.
However, the existing parser forces all of these into declarations at
parse time, wrapping statements and expressions in TopLevelCodeDecls,
so the primary API for getting the top-level entities in source files
is based on getting declarations.
Start generalizing the representation by storing ASTNode instances at
the top level, rather than declaration pointers, updating many (but
not all!) uses of this API. The walk over declarations is a (cached)
filter to pick out all of the declarations. Existing parsed files are
unaffected (the parser still creates top-level code declarations), but
the new "macro expansion" source file kind skips creating top-level
code declarations so we get the pure parse tree. Additionally, some
generalized clients (like ASTScope lookup) will now look at the list
of items, so they'll be able to walk into statements and expressions
without the intervening TopLevelCodeDecl.
Over time, I'd like to phase out `getTopLevelDecls()` entirely,
relying on the new `getTopLevelItems()` for parsed content. We can
introduce TopLevelCodeDecls more lazily for semantic walks.
Introduce `MacroExpansionExpr` and `MacroExpansionDecl` and plumb it through. Parse them in roughly the same way we parse `ObjectLiteralExpr`.
The syntax is gated under `-enable-experimental-feature Macros`.
