At the moment the only user of this method is `-interface-compiler-version`
and it's checked against major + minor only, so this is not going
to affect functionality.
In the future we should switch from `llvm::VersionTuple` to `swift::Version`
because swift tags have five components.
Resolves: rdar://140006577
Begin accepting `-swift-version 7` in asserts compilers so that we can begin to
test source-breaking changes intended for the next language version mode, such
as diagnostics that need to be staged in without breaking existing code. There
are no announced plans yet for a language mode after Swift 6, so 7 serves as a
placeholder for some future language mode.
Tests that wish to use `-swift-version 7` currently must be marked with
`REQUIRES: swift7` or they will fail in no-asserts bots. The simplest pattern
is probably to duplicate part or all of the pre-Swift 7 test to check that will
behave as intended in Swift 7.
Although I don't plan to bring over new assertions wholesale
into the current qualification branch, it's entirely possible
that various minor changes in main will use the new assertions;
having this basic support in the release branch will simplify that.
(This is why I'm adding the includes as a separate pass from
rewriting the individual assertions)
There are scenarios where different compilers are distributed with
compatible serialization format versions and the same tag. Distinguish
swiftmodules in such a case by assigning them to different distribution
channels. A compiler expecting a specific channel will only read
swiftmodules from the same channel. The channels should be defined by
downstream code as it is by definition vendor specific.
For development, a no-channel compiler loads or defining the env var
SWIFT_IGNORE_SWIFTMODULE_REVISION skips this new check.
rdar://123731777
Add a `-min-runtime-version` option that can be used to avoid problems
when building on Linux and Windows where because the runtime isn't
part of the OS, availability doesn't solve the problem of trying to
build the compiler against an older runtime.
Also add functions to IRGen to make it easy to test feature
availability using both the runtime version and the existing Darwin
availability support.
rdar://121522431
Reformatting everything now that we have `llvm` namespaces. I've
separated this from the main commit to help manage merge-conflicts and
for making it a bit easier to read the mega-patch.
This is phase-1 of switching from llvm::Optional to std::optional in the
next rebranch. llvm::Optional was removed from upstream LLVM, so we need
to migrate off rather soon. On Darwin, std::optional, and llvm::Optional
have the same layout, so we don't need to be as concerned about ABI
beyond the name mangling. `llvm::Optional` is only returned from one
function in
```
getStandardTypeSubst(StringRef TypeName,
bool allowConcurrencyManglings);
```
It's the return value, so it should not impact the mangling of the
function, and the layout is the same as `std::optional`, so it should be
mostly okay. This function doesn't appear to have users, and the ABI was
already broken 2 years ago for concurrency and no one seemed to notice
so this should be "okay".
I'm doing the migration incrementally so that folks working on main can
cherry-pick back to the release/5.9 branch. Once 5.9 is done and locked
away, then we can go through and finish the replacement. Since `None`
and `Optional` show up in contexts where they are not `llvm::None` and
`llvm::Optional`, I'm preparing the work now by going through and
removing the namespace unwrapping and making the `llvm` namespace
explicit. This should make it fairly mechanical to go through and
replace llvm::Optional with std::optional, and llvm::None with
std::nullopt. It's also a change that can be brought onto the
release/5.9 with minimal impact. This should be an NFC change.
Basic should not be allowed to link Parse, yet it was doing so
to allow Version to provide a constructor that would conveniently
parse a StringRef. This entrypoint also emitted diagnostics, so it
pulled in libAST.
Sink the version parser entrypoint down into Parse where it belongs
and point all the clients to the right place.
Use only the SWIFT_COMPILER_VERSION macro to check for swiftmodules
being written by the same compiler that reads it. In practice, it's the
macro used for release builds of the compiler.
rdar://96868333
The `SWIFT_COMPILER_VERSION` define is used to stamp a vendor’s version number into a Swift compiler binary. It can be queried from Swift code using `#if _compiler_version` and from Clang by using a preprocessor definition called `__SWIFT_COMPILER_VERSION`. These are unsupported compiler-internal features used primarily by Apple Swift.
In Swift 1.0 through 5.5, Apple Swift used a scheme for `SWIFT_COMPILER_VERSION` where the major version matched the embedded clang (e.g. 1300 for Apple Clang 13.0.0) and the minor version was ignored. Starting in Swift 5.6, Apple Swift started using major and minor version numbers that matched the Swift.org version number. This makes them easier to understand, but it means that version 1300.0.x was followed by version 5.6.x. Not only did version numbers go backwards, but also the old logic to ignore minor versions was now a liability, because it meant you would not be able to target a change to 5.7.x compilers but not 5.6.x compilers.
This commit addresses the problem by:
* Modifying the existing `#if _compiler_version(string-literal)` feature so it transforms the major version into a major and minor that will compare correctly to new version numbers. For instance, “1300.*” is transformed into “1.300”, which will compare correctly to a “5.6” or “5.7” version even if it doesn’t really capture the fact that “1300” was a Swift 5.5 compiler. As a bonus, this allows you to use the feature to backwards-compatibly test new compilers using the existing feature: “5007.*” will be seen by compilers before 5.7 as an unknown future version, but will be seen by 5.7 compilers as targeting them.
* Modifying the `__SWIFT_COMPILER_VERSION` clang define similarly so that, to preprocessor conditions written for the old scheme, a 5.7 compiler will appear to have major version 5007.
* Adding a new variant of `#if _compiler_version` with the same syntax as `#if swift` and `#if compiler`—that is, taking a comparison operator and a bare set of dotted version numbers, rather than a string literal. Going forward, this will be how version checks are written once compatibility with compilers before this change is no longer a concern.
These changes are only lightly tested because tests have to work without any compiler version defined (the default in most configurations), but I’ve tested what I can.
Fixes rdar://89841295.
To allow us to start testing language changes tied to a future Swift 6 mode without actually *shipping* a Swift 6 mode to customers who might accidentally use it before it's ready.
This commit also adds parallel tests for a number of already existing (but untested) Swift 6 mode behaviors.
Now that we use the LLVM mono-repo, we don't need to worry about clang's
version number. Also, git has the ability to estimate the safe number of
digits a hash can be truncated to and now git estimates that large
projects like LLVM and Linux "require" 12 digits for safe commit hash
abbreviation. Let's stay a little ahead of the curve and statically
truncate to 15.
Until now, only ">=" was supported in #if swift() expressions, for example:
```#if swift(>=2.1)
```#endif
This means that if we want to evaluate code only when the language version is
less than a particular version we need to do the following:
```#if !swift(>=2.1)
```#endif
An alernative to make this more readable (the "!" can be easily missed in a code
review) is to introduce another supported unary operator, "<". The previous
example could be rewritten like this:
```#if swift(<2.1)
```#endif
This commit adds support for that unary operator, along with some tests.
LLVM r334399 (and related Clang changes) moved clang::VersionTuple to
llvm::VersionTuple. Update Swift to match.
Patch by Jason Molenda.
rdar://problem/41025046
Deserializing a witness record in a conformance may fail if either of the requirement or witness changed name or type, most likely due to SDK modernization changes across Swift versions. When this happens, leave an opaque placeholder in the conformance to indicate that the witness exists but we don't get to see it. For expedience, right now this just witnesses the requirement to itself, so that code in the type checker or elsewhere that tries to ad-hoc devirtualize references to the requirement just gets the requirement back. Arguably, we shouldn't include the witness at all in imported conformances, since they should be an implementation detail, but that's a bigger, riskier change. This patch as is should be enough to address rdar://problem/31185053.
Fixes:
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-3455https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-3663https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4032https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4031
Now, compilation conditions are validated at first, then evaluated. Also,
in non-Swift3 mode, '&&' now has higher precedence than '||'.
'A || B && C || D' are evaluated as 'A || (B && C) || D'.
Swift3 source breaking changes:
* [SR-3663] This used to be accepted and evaluate to 'true' because of short
circuit without any validation.
#if true || true * 12 = try Anything is OK?
print("foo")
#endif
In this change, remaining expressions are properly validated and
diagnosed if it's invalid.
* [SR-4031] Compound name references are now diagnosed as errors.
e.g. `#if os(foo:bar:)(macOS)` or `#if FLAG(x:y:)`
Swift3 compatibility:
* [SR-3663] The precedence of '||' and '&&' are still the same and the
following code evaluates to 'true'.
#if false || true && false
print("foo")
#endif
Put in a general mechanism for mapping user-specified "compatibility
versions" to proper "effective versions" (what #if and @available
checking should respect). This may still be different from the
intrinsic "language version"; right now master is considered a "3.1"
compiler with a "Swift 4 mode", and we plan to ship a "4.0" compiler
with a "Swift 3 mode" that will have a version number of something
like "3.2".
rdar://problem/29884401 / SR-3791
The recent @escaping on variadic argument closures back-compat fix is
the first Swift 3.0 compatibility behavior that we don't want to carry
forwards indefinitely into the future. To address this, we
version-gate the diagnostic suppression.
Makes it an official compatibility check. Creates new test directory
for compatibility testing. Allow -swift-version 4 so that we can test
it both ways.
This flag switches the "effective language version" of the compiler,
at least to any version supported (as of this change: "3" or "3.0").
At the moment nothing uses it except the language version build
configuration statements (#if swift(...)) and various other places
that report, encode, or otherwise check version numbers.
In the future, it's intended as scaffolding for backwards compatibility.
Fixes SR-2582
