Since getSpecifier() now kicks off a request instead of always
returning what was previously set, we can't pass a ParamSpecifier
to the ParamDecl constructor anymore. Instead, callers either
call setSpecifier() if the ParamDecl is synthesized, or they
rely on the request, which can compute the specifier in three
specific cases:
- Ordinary parsed parameters get their specifier from the TypeRepr.
- The 'self' parameter's specifier is based on the self access kind.
- Accessor parameters are either the 'newValue' parameter of a
setter, or a cloned subscript parameter.
For closure parameters with inferred types, we still end up
calling setSpecifier() twice, once to set the initial defalut
value and a second time when applying the solution in the
case that we inferred an 'inout' specifier. In practice this
should not be a big problem because expression type checking
walks the AST in a pre-determined order anyway.
The only place this was used in Decl.h was the failability kind of a
constructor.
I decided to replace this with a boolean isFailable() bit. Now that
we have isImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional(), it seems to make more sense
to not have ConstructorDecl represent redundant information which
might not be internally consistent.
Most callers of getFailability() actually only care if the result is
failable or not; the few callers that care about it being IUO can
check isImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional() as well.
This improves on the previous situation:
- The request ensures that the backing storage for lazy properties
and property wrappers gets synthesized first; previously it was
only somewhat guaranteed by callers.
- Instead of returning a range this just returns an ArrayRef,
which simplifies clients.
- Indexing into the ArrayRef is O(1), which addresses some FIXMEs
in the SIL optimizer.
Instead of requiring that function body synthesizers will always call
setBody(), which is annoyingly stateful, have function body synthesizers
always return the synthesized brace statement along with a bit that
indicates whether the body was already type-checked. This takes us a
step closer to centralizing the mutation of the body of a function.
When synthesizing Codable conformances, the enum case name for a
property with an attached delegate does not have the '$', i.e., it's
the name of the originally-declared property.
Decodable’s init(from:) synthesis sometimes mistook a static property for an identically-named instance property, which could cause it to skip a property or possibly make other mistakes. This change factors a common helper function from encode(to:) and init(from:) synthesis which implements the right logic for both.
Parsed declarations would create an untyped 'self' parameter;
synthesized, imported and deserialized declarations would get a
typed one.
In reality the type, if any, depends completely on the properties
of the function in question, so we can just lazily create the
'self' parameter when needed.
If the function already has a type, we give it a type right there;
otherwise, we check if a 'self' was already created when we
compute a function's type and set the type of 'self' then.
- getAsDeclOrDeclExtensionContext -> getAsDecl
This is basically the same as a dyn_cast, so it should use a 'getAs'
name like TypeBase does.
- getAsNominalTypeOrNominalTypeExtensionContext -> getSelfNominalTypeDecl
- getAsClassOrClassExtensionContext -> getSelfClassDecl
- getAsEnumOrEnumExtensionContext -> getSelfEnumDecl
- getAsStructOrStructExtensionContext -> getSelfStructDecl
- getAsProtocolOrProtocolExtensionContext -> getSelfProtocolDecl
- getAsTypeOrTypeExtensionContext -> getSelfTypeDecl (private)
These do /not/ return some form of 'this'; instead, they get the
extended types when 'this' is an extension. They started off life with
'is' names, which makes sense, but changed to this at some point. The
names I went with match up with getSelfInterfaceType and
getSelfTypeInContext, even though strictly speaking they're closer to
what getDeclaredInterfaceType does. But it didn't seem right to claim
that an extension "declares" the ClassDecl here.
- getAsProtocolExtensionContext -> getExtendedProtocolDecl
Like the above, this didn't return the ExtensionDecl; it returned its
extended type.
This entire commit is a mechanical change: find-and-replace, followed
by manual reformatted but no code changes.
There are two general constructor forms here:
- One took the number of parameter lists, to be filled in later.
Now, this takes a boolean indicating if there is an implicit
'self'.
- The other one took the actual parameter lists and filled them
in right away. This now takes a separate 'self' ParamDecl and
ParameterList.
Instead of storing the number of parameter lists, an
AbstractFunctionDecl now only needs to store if there is a 'self'
or not.
I've updated most places that construct AbstractFunctionDecls to
properly use these new forms. In the ClangImporter, there is
more code that remains to be untangled, so we continue to build
multiple ParameterLists and unpack them into a ParamDecl and
ParameterList at the last minute.
Previously, some PBDs weren't being marked implicit even though the associated vars were implicit. PatternBindingDecl::createImplicit will be even nicer when we start parsing the location of the equals token.
This works for all protocols except for Decodable on non-final classes, because
the init requirement has to be 'required' and thus in the type's declaration.
Fixes most of https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-6803.
Instead of passing around a TypeChecker and three Decls (the nominal type, the
protocol, and the decl declaring the conformance) everywhere, we can just pass
one object.
This should be [NFC].
Previously, we just took the first match so:
1. We would try to emit a metatype lookup of the property but had prepared an instance lookup.
2. Could get the wrong type if the static/instance property had different types.
rdar://39669212
Since 'private' means "limit to the enclosing scope (and extensions
thereof)", putting it on a member means that the member can't be
accessed everywhere the type might show up. That's normally a good
thing, but it's not the desired effect for synthesized members used
for derived conformances, and when it comes to class initializers this
actually violates AST invariants.
rdar://problem/39478298
