This allows building sourcekitd and swift-refactor with `SWIFT_BUILD_SWIFT_SYNTAX=NO`. In these builds, the `relatedidents` and `find-syntactic-rename-ranges` requests will always return an error.
Expand macros in the specified source file syntactically (without any
module imports, nor typechecking).
Request would look like:
```
{
key.compilerargs: [...]
key.sourcefile: <file name>
key.sourcetext: <source text> (optional)
key.expansions: [<expansion specifier>...]
}
```
`key.compilerargs` are used for getting plugins search paths. If
`key.sourcetext` is not specified, it's loaded from the file system.
Each `<expansion sepecifier>` is
```
{
key.offset: <offset>
key.modulename: <plugin module name>
key.typename: <macro typename>
key.macro_roles: [<macro role UID>...]
}
```
Clients have to provide the module and type names because that's
semantic.
Response is a `CategorizedEdits` just like (semantic) "ExpandMacro"
refactoring. But without `key.buffer_name`. Nested expnasions are not
supported at this point.
'sourcekitd' itself should not call 'swift::' functions. It should just
deserialize the request, execute the logic in LangSupport, then serialize
the result.
Ensure that we link `swift_CompilerPluginSupport` into the compiler and
SourceKit, and set the rpath appropriately to find the library in its
installed location.
A number of driver tests copy the driver executable into a temporary
directory to isolate it from the build tree. Also copy the plugin
support library into its appropriate place near the driver executable
to ensure these tests keep working. To help with this, add a
`swift_swift_parser` lit feature, which we can use in tests that
involve the new parser's capabilities.
IDE/Refactoring had dependencies to libswiftIndex, but libswiftIndex
also depends on libswiftIDE (SourceEntityWalker, etc.)
To break libswiftIndex <-> libswiftIDE dependency cycle, move
"refactoring" related files to a new library 'libswiftRefactoring'
rdar://101692282
These libraries formed a strongly connected component in the CMake build graph. The weakest link I could find was from IDE to FrontendTool and Frontend, which was necessitated by the `CompileInstance` class (https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/40645). I moved a few files out of IDE into a new IDETools library to break the cycle.
Adds a new 'key.retrieve_symbol_graph' option to the request. When set to 1 it
includes the JSON for a SymbolGraph containing a single node for the symbol at
the requested position.
This also extends the SymbolGraph library with a new entry point to get a graph
for a single symbol, and to additionally support type substitution to match the
existing CursorInfo behavior (e.g. so that when invoked on `first` in
`Array<Int>().first`, the type is given as `Int?` rather than `Element?`).
Resolves rdar://problem/70551509
Move the source files from ParserSIL into the SIL library and remove the
ParserSIL library. ParsersSIL doesn't need to be its own library and this change will
simplify our builds.
This removes the custom `LINK_LIBS` in favour of
`target_link_libraries`. This simplifies the custom functions that we
have for adding libraries, makes it easier to query the information from
ninja and will allow us to slowly remove more of the custom logic for
building the products.
This refactors DWARFImporter to become a part of ClangImporter, since
it needs access to many of its implementation details anyway. The
DWARFImporterDelegate is just another mechanism for deserializing
Clang ASTs and once we have a Clang AST, the processing is effectively
the same.
`source.request.conformingmethods` is a new SourceKit request which
receives a source position and a list of protocol namses, returns a list
of methods whose return type conforms to the requested protocols.
rdar://problem/44699573
This is a new SourceKit request which receives a position in the source
file, returns possible expected types and their members which can be
referenced by "implicit member expression" syntax.
When debugging Objective-C or C++ code on Darwin, the debug info
collected by dsymutil in the .dSYM bundle is entirely
self-contained. It is possible to debug a program, set breakpoints and
print variables even without having the complete original source code
or a matching SDK available. With Swift, this is currently not the
case. Even though .dSYM bundles contain the binary .swiftmodule for
all Swift modules, any Clang modules that the Swift modules depend on,
still need to be imported from source to even get basic LLDB
functionality to work. If ClangImporter fails to import a Clang
module, effectively the entire Swift module depending on it gets
poisoned.
This patch is addressing this issue by introducing a ModuleLoader that
can ask queries about Clang Decls to LLDB, since LLDB knows how to
reconstruct Clang decls from DWARF and clang -gmodules producxes full
debug info for Clang modules that is embedded into the .dSYM budle.
This initial version does not contain any advanced functionality at
all, it merely produces an empty ModuleDecl. Intertestingly, even this
is a considerable improvement over the status quo. LLDB can now print
Swift-only variables in modules with failing Clang depenecies, and
becuase of fallback mechanisms that were implemented earlier, it can
even display the contents of pure Objective-C objects that are
imported into Swift. C structs obviously don't work yet.
rdar://problem/36032653
Currently, SourceKit's CMake functions all use DEPENDS to specify
libraries the targets will link with. This is confusing as it doesn't
behave the same way that add_swift behaves, and implies that
dependencies are created when there aren't.
* Generate libSyntax API
This patch removes the hand-rolled libSyntax API and replaces it with an
API that's entirely automatically generated. This means the API is
guaranteed to be internally stylistically and functionally consistent.
...finally breaking the dependency of Parse on Sema.
There are still some unfortunate dependencies here -- Xi's working on
getting /AST/ not dependent on Sema -- but this is a step forward.
It is a little strange that parseIntoSourceFile is in ParseSIL, and
therefore that that's still a dependency for anyone trying to, well,
parse. However, nearly all clients that parse want to type-check as
well, and that requires Sema, Serialization, and the ClangImporter...
and Serialization and SIL currently require each other as well
(another circular dependency). So it's not actively causing us trouble
right now.
This pipeline is run as part of IRGen and has access to the IRGenModule.
Passes that run as part of this pipeline can query for the IRGenModule.
We will use it for the AllocStackHoisting pass. It wants to know if a type is of
non-fixed size.
To break the cyclic dependency between IRGen -> SILOptimizer -> IRGen that would
arise from the SILPassManager having to know about the createIRGENPASS()
function IRGen passes instead of exposing this function dynamically have to add
themselves to the pass manager.
The sourcekitd-repl, sourcekitd-test and complete-test use symbols
from both the coverage and lto modules, specifically
`llvm::coverage::CoverageFilenamesSectionWriter::write` and
`llvm::lto::thinBackend`. Adding these to the list of dependencies
allows SourceKit to be built on Linux.
Issue: SR-3223
Now that I am going to be adding an IN_SWIFT_COMPONENT argument, I need to do
this to distinguish the concepts of an LLVM_COMPONENT and a SWIFT_COMPONENT.
(libraries now)
It has been generally agreed that we need to do this reorg, and now
seems like the perfect time. Some major pass reorganization is in the
works.
This does not have to be the final word on the matter. The consensus
among those working on the code is that it's much better than what we
had and a better starting point for future bike shedding.
Note that the previous organization was designed to allow separate
analysis and optimization libraries. It turns out this is an
artificial distinction and not an important goal.
The code goes into its own sub-tree under 'tools' but tests go under 'test',
so that running 'check-swift' will also run all the SourceKit tests.
SourceKit is disabled on non-darwin platforms.
