The problem with `is_escaping_closure` was that it didn't consume its operand and therefore reference count checks were unreliable.
For example, copy-propagation could break it.
As this instruction was always used together with an immediately following `destroy_value` of the closure, it makes sense to combine both into a `destroy_not_escaped_closure`.
It
1. checks the reference count and returns true if it is 1
2. consumes and destroys the operand
Introduce a new instruction `dealloc_stack_ref ` and remove the `stack` flag from `dealloc_ref`.
The `dealloc_ref [stack]` was confusing, because all it does is to mark the deallocation of the stack space for a stack promoted object.
This change is motivated by highlighting for
test/Interpreter/SDK/lib.swift. It contains the line
// CHECK: the magic word is ///* magic *///
which without this change leaves the rest of the file highlighted as
commented out. swiftComment cannot contain swiftLineComment, or else
this:
/* // */ hello
gets incorrectly highlighted as if "hello" was commented out.
Similarly, swiftLineComment cannot contain swiftComment, or else this:
// /*
*/
gets incorrectly highlighted as if */ was closing a comment, when
actually it should be a syntax error.
Will be used to verify that withoutActuallyEscaping's block does not
escape the closure.
``%escaping = is_escaping_closure %closure`` tests the reference count. If the
closure is not uniquely referenced it prints out and error message and
returns true. Otherwise, it returns false. The returned result can be
used with a ``cond_fail %escaping`` instruction to abort the program.
rdar://35525730
This has the same semantics as open_existential_box, but returns an object value
instead of an address.
This is used in SIL opaque values mode. Attempting to reuse open_existential_box
in this mode causes SIL type inconsistencies that are too difficult to work
around. Adding this instruction allows for consistent handling of opaque values.
The original versions of several of these currently redundant instructions will
be removed once the SIL representation stabilizes.
These instructions have the same semantics as the *ExistentialAddr instructions
but operate directly on the existential value, not its address.
This is in preparation for adding ExistentialBoxValue instructions.
The previous name would cause impossible confusion with "opaque existentials"
and "opaque existential boxes".
There's a buggy SIL verifier check that was previously tautological,
and it turns out that it's violated, apparently harmlessly. Since it
was already doing nothing, I've commented it out temporarily while
I figure out the right way to fix SILGen to get the invariant right.
Change all uses of "do { ... } while <cond>" to use "repeat" instead.
Rename DoWhileStmt to RepeatWhileStmt. Add diagnostic suggesting change
of 'do' to 'repeat' if a condition is found afterwards.
<rdar://problem/20336424> rename do/while loops to repeat/while & introduce "repeat <count> {}" loops
Swift SVN r27650
For better consistency with other address-only instruction variants, and to open the door to new exciting existential representations (such as a refcounted boxed representation for ErrorType).
Swift SVN r25902
