Compute and propagate the library level (api/spi/ipi) of each module
dependency through the dependency scanner so that the compiler can
correctly enforce private module import diagnostics in CAS mode, where
path-based SPI detection fails because CAS abstracts file paths to
content IDs.
Swift modules:
- Detect library level from the module interface path using
libraryLevelFromPath() during scanning, for both textual (.swiftinterface)
and binary (.swiftmodule) Swift modules.
Clang modules:
- Expose ModuleMapIsPrivate from clang::Module in ModuleDeps via the
dependency scanning infrastructure.
- Set library level for clang modules in bridgeClangModuleDependency()
using ModuleMapIsPrivate (catches module.private.modulemap in any
SDK location) and libraryLevelFromPath() on the module map file
(catches modules under PrivateFrameworks directories).
The library level is:
- Stored in ModuleDependencyInfo and serialized in the module dependency
cache (format version bumped to v8).
- Exposed through the swiftscan C API via a new
swiftscan_module_info_get_library_level() function (API minor version
bumped to 3).
- Emitted in the dependency scanner JSON output as "libraryLevel" for
all module kinds (Swift textual, Swift binary, Clang, and main module).
- Parsed from the explicit module map JSON by ExplicitModuleMapParser
for both Swift (ExplicitSwiftModuleInputInfo) and Clang
(ExplicitClangModuleInputInfo) modules.
- Looked up in ModuleLibraryLevelRequest via
ASTContext::getExplicitModuleLibraryLevel(name, isClang), which
consults the appropriate map (Swift or Clang) based on module kind.
rdar://172693314
Assisted-By: Claude
This was used a long time ago for a design of a scanner which could rely on the client to specify that some modules *will be* present at a given location but are not yet during the scan. We have long ago determined that the scanner must have all modules available to it at the time of scan for soundness. This code has been stale for a couple of years and it is time to simplify things a bit by deleting it.
For the main source module, provide info on which dependencies are directly imported into the user program, explicitly ('import' statement) or implicitly (e.g. stdlib). Thist list does not include Swift overlay dependencies, cross-import dependencies, bridging header dependencies.
Add ability to automatically chaining the bridging headers discovered from all
dependencies module when doing swift caching build. This will eliminate all
implicit bridging header imports from the build and make the bridging header
importing behavior much more reliable, while keep the compatibility at maximum.
For example, if the current module A depends on module B and C, and both B and
C are binary modules that uses bridging header, when building module A,
dependency scanner will construct a new header that chains three bridging
headers together with the option to build a PCH from it. This will make all
importing errors more obvious while improving the performance.
Add function to handle all macro dependencies kinds in the scanner,
including taking care of the macro definitions in the module interface
for its client to use. The change involves:
* Encode the macro definition inside the binary module
* Resolve macro modules in the dependencies scanners, including those
declared inside the dependency modules.
* Propagate the macro defined from the direct dependencies to track
all the potentially available modules inside a module compilation.
Fix few issues from previous implementation from explicit module build
with macros and accurate macro dependency scanning in
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/73421.
First, there is a crash when propagating the macro dependencies. It
turns out that the current macro plugin implementation doesn't need the
downstream users to know about the plugin search path from the upstream
dependencies.
Secondly, fix a bug that the swiftinterface that has macro usage won't
build because the build command doesn't inherit the plugin search path
option.
Finally, add JSON output for macro dependencies so it is easier to
debug the macro dependencies.
rdar://131214106
Although I don't plan to bring over new assertions wholesale
into the current qualification branch, it's entirely possible
that various minor changes in main will use the new assertions;
having this basic support in the release branch will simplify that.
(This is why I'm adding the includes as a separate pass from
rewriting the individual assertions)
Teach scanner to respect the working directory set in the invocation
through scanner C API.
Also add test infrastructure to testing scanner from C API. Break up
DependencyScan lib into two so the swift-scan-test and remain small
without understanding swift AST.
rdar://127626011
Steven Wu
Artem Chikin
Hiroshi Yamauchi
Saleem Abdulrasool
Xi Ge
Tim Kientzle