This was a nice feature when people said "-swift-version 3.1"...
up until we got "-swift-version 4.2" as an actual valid version.
Just drop the special case.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-8850
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
The metadata reference to the pre-exsting VWT cannot be supported on PE/COFF
due to the direct reference to a value in an external module that is in
static data (the model requires indirecting through memory). Always
force the lazy initialization for the metadata on such platforms.
This requires a secondary change - to initialize the VWT as well. This
is ideally moved into the runtime where we can do this uniformly.
Because this feature mostly exists for the standard library, turn it on
specifically. This avoids having to serialize it in the flags necessary
for parseable interfaces.
If runtime asserts are disabled in general, also disable runtime
exclusivity checks unless explicitly requested.
-Ounchecked is an unsupported benchmarking mode, but, if used, it
should disable all runtime assertions. Exclusivity checks are no more
essential than integer overflow or bounds checks.
`#assert` is a new static assertion statement that will let us write
tests for the new constant evaluation infrastructure that we are working
on. `#assert` works by lowering to a `Builtin.poundAssert` SIL
instruction. The constant evaluation infrastructure will look for these
SIL instructions, const-evaluate their conditions, and emit errors if
the conditions are non-constant or false.
This commit implements parsing, typechecking and SILGen for `#assert`.
This change could impact Swift programs that previously appeared
well-behaved, but weren't fully tested in debug mode. Now, when running
in release mode, they may trap with the message "error: overlapping
accesses...".
Recent optimizations have brought performance where I think it needs
to be for adoption. More optimizations are planned, and some
benchmarks should be further improved, but at this point we're ready
to begin receiving bug reports. That will help prioritize the
remaining work for Swift 5.
Of the 656 public microbenchmarks in the Swift repository, there are
still several regressions larger than 10%:
TEST OLD NEW DELTA RATIO
ClassArrayGetter2 139 1307 +840.3% **0.11x**
HashTest 631 1233 +95.4% **0.51x**
NopDeinit 21269 32389 +52.3% **0.66x**
Hanoi 1478 2166 +46.5% **0.68x**
Calculator 127 158 +24.4% **0.80x**
Dictionary3OfObjects 391 455 +16.4% **0.86x**
CSVParsingAltIndices2 526 604 +14.8% **0.87x**
Prims 549 626 +14.0% **0.88x**
CSVParsingAlt2 1252 1411 +12.7% **0.89x**
Dictionary4OfObjects 206 232 +12.6% **0.89x**
ArrayInClass 46 51 +10.9% **0.90x**
The common pattern in these benchmarks is to define an array of data
as a class property and to repeatedly access that array through the
class reference. Each of those class property accesses now incurs a
runtime call. Naturally, introducing a runtime call in a loop that
otherwise does almost no work incurs substantial overhead. This is
similar to the issue caused by automatic reference counting. In some
cases, more sophistacated optimization will be able to determine the
same object is repeatedly accessed. Furthermore, the overhead of the
runtime call itself can be improved. But regardless of how well we
optimize, there will always a class of microbenchmarks in which the
runtime check has a noticeable impact.
As a general guideline, avoid performing class property access within
the most performance critical loops, particularly on different objects
in each loop iteration. If that isn't possible, it may help if the
visibility of those class properties is private or internal.
Currently, the check for whether to serialize parseable interface
arguments doesn't handle the case where a supplementary output file map
is used, preferring only to check if the frontend is passed
`-emit*interface`. Instead, check if the frontend inputs and outputs
contains a parseable interface, and use that to determine if we need to
save args.
This also puts `-module-link-name` in the parseable interface arg list.
Rather than limiting this to protocols, allow any nominal type.
Rename -enable-operator-designated-protocols to
-enable-operator-designated-types to reflect the change.
The YAML format is the same one produced by the -dump-type-info
frontend mode.
For now this is only enabled if the -read-type-info-path frontend
flag is specified.
Progress on <rdar://problem/17528739>.
Add a staging option for enabling upcoming changes in the solver in
support of using the protocols designated in Policy.swift to guide
operator type checking.
When provided, this flag warns about implicit overrides, where a
declaration overrides another declaration but is not marked with the
‘override’ keyword. The warning can be suppressed by either providing
‘override’ or ‘@_nonoverride’.
At present, this only happens with overrides in protocols.
LLDB needs the -swift-version because the -D__swift__ macro affects
how Clang modules are built. This currently has the really odd effect
that when debugging a Swift program that is not using the very latest
Swift version, the first "po" takes several seconds, because the
module cache needs to be rebuilt.
rdar://problem/40241256
This is helpful in experimenting with constraint solver changes that
might help us remove some of these unsound options. It's not ever mean
to be enabled, but if we're able to remove the things guarded by the
option we can eventually remove the option.
Adds the -vfsoverlay frontend option that enables the user to pass
VFS overlay YAML files to Swift. These files define a (potentially
many-layered) virtual mapping on which we predicate a VFS.
Switch all input-based memory buffer reads in the Frontend to the new
FileSystem-based approach.
I made this change by removing the SILOption and then doing a compile, fix loop. I
purposely did not move around the code to make the refactoring really easy to
see.
This flag is based on Clang's -fdebug-prefix-map, which lets the user remap absolute paths in debug info. This is necessary for reproducible builds and allows debugging to work on a different machine than the one that built the code when paths to the source may be different.
