TupleShuffleExpr could not express the full range of tuple conversions that
were accepted by the constraint solver; in particular, while it could re-order
elements or introduce and eliminate labels, it could not convert the tuple
element types to their supertypes.
This was the source of the annoying "cannot express tuple conversion"
diagnostic.
Replace TupleShuffleExpr with DestructureTupleExpr, which evaluates a
source expression of tuple type and binds its elements to OpaqueValueExprs.
The DestructureTupleExpr's result expression can then produce an arbitrary
value written in terms of these OpaqueValueExprs, as long as each
OpaqueValueExpr is used exactly once.
This is sufficient to express conversions such as (Int, Float) => (Int?, Any),
as well as the various cases that were already supported, such as
(x: Int, y: Float) => (y: Float, x: Int).
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-2672, rdar://problem/12340004
OpaqueValueState used to store a SILValue, so back then the IsConsumable flag
was meaningful. But now we can just check if the ManagedValue has a cleanup
or not.
Also, we were passing around an opened ArchetypeType for no good reason.
Before extending TupleShuffleExpr to represent all tuple
conversions allowed by the constraint solver, remove the
parts of TupleShuffleExpr that are no longer needed; this is
support for default arguments, varargs, and scalar-to-tuple and
tuple-to-scalar conversions.
Right now we use TupleShuffleExpr for two completely different things:
- Tuple conversions, where elements can be re-ordered and labels can be
introduced/eliminated
- Complex argument lists, involving default arguments or varargs
The first case does not allow default arguments or varargs, and the
second case does not allow re-ordering or introduction/elimination
of labels. Furthermore, the first case has a representation limitation
that prevents us from expressing tuple conversions that change the
type of tuple elements.
For all these reasons, it is better if we use two separate Expr kinds
for these purposes. For now, just make an identical copy of
TupleShuffleExpr and call it ArgumentShuffleExpr. In CSApply, use
ArgumentShuffleExpr when forming the arguments to a call, and keep
using TupleShuffleExpr for tuple conversions. Each usage of
TupleShuffleExpr has been audited to see if it should instead look at
ArgumentShuffleExpr.
In sequent commits I plan on redesigning TupleShuffleExpr to correctly
represent all tuple conversions without any unnecessary baggage.
Longer term, we actually want to change the representation of CallExpr
to directly store an argument list; then instead of a single child
expression that must be a ParenExpr, TupleExpr or ArgumentShuffleExpr,
all CallExprs will have a uniform representation and ArgumentShuffleExpr
will go away altogether. This should reduce memory usage and radically
simplify parts of SILGen.
The ownership kind is Any for trivial types, or Owned otherwise, but
whether a type is trivial or not will soon depend on the resilience
expansion.
This means that a SILModule now uniques two SILUndefs per type instead
of one, and serialization uses two distinct sentinel IDs for this
purpose as well.
For now, the resilience expansion is not actually used here, so this
change is NFC, other than changing the module format.
Each call site will soon have to think about passing in the right expansion
instead of just assuming the default will be OK. But there are now only a
few call sites left, because most have been refactored to use convenience
APIs that pass in the right resilience expansion already.
For context, String, Nil, Bool, and Int already behave this way.
Note: Swift can compile against 80 or 64 bit floats as the builtin
literal type. Thus, it was necessary to capture this bit somehow in the
FloatLiteralExpr. This was done as another Type field capturing this
info.
For context, String, Nil, and Bool already behave this way.
Note: Before it used to construct (call, ... (integer_literal)), and the
call would be made explicit / implicit based on if you did eg: Int(3) or
just 3. This however did not translate to the new world so this PR adds
a IsExplicitConversion bit to NumberLiteralExpr. Some side results of
all this are that some warnings changed a little and some instructions are
emitted in a different order.
Instead of constructing calls to ExpressibleByBooleanLiteral.init(booleanLiteral: ...) in CSApply.cpp, just
annotate BooleanLiteralExpr with the selected constructor and do the actual construction during SILGen.
For context, StringLiteralExpr and NilLiteralExpr already behave this way.
Instead of constructing calls to
ExpressibleByNilLiteral.init(nilLiteral: ()) in CSApply.cpp, just
annotate NilLiteralExpr with the selected construtor and do the actual
construction during SILGen.
For context, StringLiteralExpr already behaves this way.
We use TupleShuffleExpr in RValue position for enum element payloads, and
it can happen that the source is a scalar if you're calling the enum element
constructor with a trailing closure.
This reverts commit 7960660b7e.
Fixes <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-9675>.
We already assert that each element of the tuple is an lvalue;
asserting that the tuple itself has an lvalue or is Void is
incorrect because the tuple might have zero non-tuple elements
recursively but itself not be Void, eg ((), ()).
Fixes <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-5919>.
In a previous commit, I banned in the verifier any SILValue from producing
ValueOwnershipKind::Any in preparation for this.
This change arises out of discussions in between John, Andy, and I around
ValueOwnershipKind::Trivial. The specific realization was that this ownership
kind was an unnecessary conflation of the a type system idea (triviality) with
an ownership idea (@any, an ownership kind that is compatible with any other
ownership kind at value merge points and can only create). This caused the
ownership model to have to contort to handle the non-payloaded or trivial cases
of non-trivial enums. This is unnecessary if we just eliminate the any case and
in the verifier separately verify that trivial => @any (notice that we do not
verify that @any => trivial).
NOTE: This is technically an NFC intended change since I am just replacing
Trivial with Any. That is why if you look at the tests you will see that I
actually did not need to update anything except removing some @trivial ownership
since @any ownership is represented without writing @any in the parsed sil.
rdar://46294760
We want removing a property override to be a resilient change, so
keypaths should not reference them, preferring to reference the
base declaration instead.
Instead of passing in a DeclContext, which we don't have when emitting a keypath
accessor, pass in a ModuleDecl and ResilienceExpansion.
Keypaths now work well enough in inlinable contexts that we can check in an
end-to-end resilience test.
Not NFC because it also fixes an evaluation order bug (and reorders
some less-important stuff): the key-path expression needs to be
evaluated immediately during formal evaluation and cannot be delayed
until start-of-access.
