Not sure why but this was another "toxic utility method".
Most of the usages fell into one of three categories:
- The base value was always non-null, so we could just call
getCanonicalType() instead, making intent more explicit
- The result was being compared for equality, so we could
skip canonicalization and call isEqual() instead, removing
some boilerplate
- Utterly insane code that made no sense
There were only a couple of legitimate uses, and even there
open-coding the conditional null check made the code clearer.
Also while I'm at it, make the SIL open archetypes tracker
more typesafe by passing around ArchetypeType * instead of
Type and CanType.
This means using a struct so we can put methods on the struct and using an
anonymous enum to create namespaced values. Specifically:
struct SILArgumentConvention {
enum : uint8_t {
Indirect_In,
Indirect_In_Guaranteed,
Indirect_Inout,
Indirect_InoutAliasable,
Indirect_Out,
Direct_Owned,
Direct_Unowned,
Direct_Deallocating,
Direct_Guaranteed,
} Value;
SILArgumentConvention(decltype(Value) NewValue)
: Value(NewValue) {}
operator decltype(Value)() const {
return Value;
}
ParameterConvention getParameterConvention() const {
switch (Value) {
...
}
}
bool isIndirectConvention() const {
...
}
};
This allows for:
1. Avoiding abstraction leakage via the enum type. If someone wants to use
decltype as well, I think that is enough work that the leakage is acceptable.
2. Still refer to enum cases like we are working with an enum class
(e.g. SILArgumentConvention::Direct_Owned).
3. Avoid using the anonymous type in function arguments due to an implicit
conversion.
4. And most importantly... *drum roll* add methods to our enums!
If by chance we haven't imported the members of a particular class,
SIL should not fault them in if at all possible.
The test case was a pain to come up with; it involves a class using
a forward-declared protocol that's actually defined in Swift /in a
non-primary file/, where that protocol is never mentioned in the
primary file and the class's members are never accessed otherwise.
rdar://problem/29535170
For a long time, we have:
1. Created methods on SILArgument that only work on either function arguments or
block arguments.
2. Created code paths in the compiler that only allow for "function"
SILArguments or "block" SILArguments.
This commit refactors SILArgument into two subclasses, SILPHIArgument and
SILFunctionArgument, separates the function and block APIs onto the subclasses
(leaving the common APIs on SILArgument). It also goes through and changes all
places in the compiler that conditionalize on one of the forms of SILArgument to
just use the relevant subclass. This is made easier by the relevant APIs not
being on SILArgument anymore. If you take a quick look through you will see that
the API now expresses a lot more of its intention.
The reason why I am performing this refactoring now is that SILFunctionArguments
have a ValueOwnershipKind defined by the given function's signature. On the
other hand, SILBlockArguments have a stored ValueOwnershipKind. Rather than
store ValueOwnershipKind in both instances and in the function case have a dead
variable, I decided to just bite the bullet and fix this.
rdar://29671437
Changes:
* Terminate all namespaces with the correct closing comment.
* Make sure argument names in comments match the corresponding parameter name.
* Remove redundant get() calls on smart pointers.
* Prefer using "override" or "final" instead of "virtual". Remove "virtual" where appropriate.
This was already done for getSuccessorBlocks() to distinguish getting successor
blocks from getting the full list of SILSuccessors via getSuccessors(). This
commit just makes all of the successor/predecessor code follow that naming
convention.
Some examples:
getSingleSuccessor() => getSingleSuccessorBlock().
isSuccessor() => isSuccessorBlock().
getPreds() => getPredecessorBlocks().
Really, IMO, we should consider renaming SILSuccessor to a more verbose name so
that it is clear that it is more of an internal detail of SILBasicBlock's
implementation rather than something that one should consider as apart of one's
mental model of the IR when one really wants to be thinking about predecessor
and successor blocks. But that is not what this commit is trying to change, it
is just trying to eliminate a bit of technical debt by making the naming
conventions here consistent.
Before this commit all code relating to handling arguments in SILBasicBlock had
somewhere in the name BB. This is redundant given that the class's name is
already SILBasicBlock. This commit drops those names.
Some examples:
getBBArg() => getArgument()
BBArgList => ArgumentList
bbarg_begin() => args_begin()
We weren't clearing the worklist flags if returning true here. Oops!
This would manifest as alias analysis returning different results
for the same operands over time, which confused ARC code motion
into dropping release instructions.
This reduces the amount of SIL generated for array operations significantly.
The generated code should be mostly the same (modulo different inlining decisions).
The new instructions are: ref_tail_addr, tail_addr and a new attribute [ tail_elems ] for alloc_ref.
For details see docs/SIL.rst
As these new instructions are not generated so far, this is a NFC.
Till now, the escape analysis would always pessimistically assume that any strong_release or release_value may result in a destructor call and the object may escape through it. With this change, the escape analysis would determine for local objects whose exact dynamic type is known which destructors would be called and check if local objects may really escape in those destructors.
