This assumes these will land in Swift 4.1; the attributes need to be adjusted if that turns out not to be the case.
It seems @available for protocol conformances is not yet functional. I added attributes for those anyway, marked with FIXME(conformance-availability).
# Conflicts:
# stdlib/public/core/ExistentialCollection.swift.gyb
# stdlib/public/core/Mirror.swift
Now that Array and Dictionary conform to Hashable, we need to make sure that their bridged counterparts provide the same hash values when converted to AnyHashable.
* Add conditional Hashable conformance to Optional, Dictionary, Array, ArraySlice and ContiguousArray
* Modified hashValue implementations
The hashValues are now calculated similar to the automatically synthesized values when conforming to Hashable.
This entails using _combineHashValues as values of the collections are iterated - as well as calling _mixInt before returning the hash.
* Added FIXMEs as suggested by Max Moiseev
* Use checkHashable to check Hashable conformance
* Use 2 space indentation
* Hashing of Dictionary is now independent of traversal order
* Added a test to proof failure of (previous) wrong implementation of Dictionary hashValue. Unfortunately it does not work.
* Removed '_mixInt' from 'hashValue' implementation of Optional and Array types based on recommendations from lorentey
* Another attempt at detecting bad hashing due to traversal order
* Dictionary Hashable validation tests now detect bad hashing due to dependence on traversal order
* Removed superfluous initial _mixInt call for Dictionary hashValue implementation.
* Add more elements to dictionary in test to increase the number of possible permutations - making it more likely to detect order-dependent hashes
* Added Hashable conformance to CollectionOfOne, EmptyCollection and Range types
* Fix indirect referral to the only member of CollectionOfOne
* Re-added Hashable conformance to Range after merge from master
* Change hashValue based on comment from @lorentey
* Remove tests for conditional Hashable conformance for Range types. This is left for a followup PR
* Added tests for CollectionOfOne and EmptyCollection
* Added conditional conformance fo Equatable and Hashable for DictionaryLiteral. Added tests too.
* Added conditional Equatable and Hashable conformance to Slice
* Use 'elementsEqual' for Slice equality operator
* Fixed documentation comment and indentation
* Fix DictionaryLiteral equality implementation
* Revert "Fix DictionaryLiteral equality implementation"
This reverts commit 7fc1510bc3.
* Fix DictionaryLiteral equality implementation
* Use equalElements(:by:) to compare DictionaryLiteral elements
* Added conditional conformance for Equatable and Hashable to AnyCollection
* Revert "Use 'elementsEqual' for Slice equality operator"
This reverts commit 0ba2278b96.
* Revert "Added conditional Equatable and Hashable conformance to Slice"
This reverts commit 84f9934bb4.
* Added conditional conformance for Equatable and Hashable for ClosedRange
Currently, when we reference a (non-generic) typealias within a
generic context, we would completely lose type sugar for the
typealias, replacing it with the underlying type. Instead, use
BoundNameAliasType for this purpose, which allows us to maintain all
of the type sugar as well as storing complete substitutions for later
use.
The DeclChecker had three possible states:
- IsFirstPass true, IsSecondPass false. This is the 'first pass' for
declarations that appear at the top-level, or are nested inside
top-level types.
- IsFirstPass false, IsSecondPass true. This is the 'second pass' for
declarations that appear at the top-level, or are nested inside
top-level types.
- IsFirstPass false, IsSecondPass false. This was used for (some)
local declarations.
This is unnecessarily confusing. We can eliminate the third state
by calling typeCheckDecl() twice in a few places. This allows
IsSecondPass to be removed entirely since it's now always equal to
!IsFirstPass.
Stress tests are, by definition, stressful. They intentionally burn a
lot of resources by using randomness to hopefully surface state machine
bugs. Additionally, many stress tests are multi-threaded these days and
they may attempt to use all of the available CPUs to better uncover
bugs. In isolation, this is not a problem, but the test suite as a whole
assumes that individual tests are single threaded and therefore running
multiple stress tests at once can quickly spiral out of control.
This change formalizes stress tests and then treats them like long
tests, i.e. tested via 'check-swift-all' and otherwise opt-in.
Finally, with this change, the CI build bots might need to change if
they are still only testing 'validation' instead of all of the tests.
I see three options:
1) Run all of the tests. -- There are very few long tests left these
days, and the additional costs seems small relative to the cost of
the whole validation test suite before this change.
2) Continue checking 'validation', now sans stress tests.
3) Check 'validation', *then* the stress tests. If the former doesn't
pass, then there is no point in the latter, and by running the stress
tests separately, they stand a better chance of uncovering bugs and
not overwhelming build bot resources.
In theory there could be a "fixed-layout" enum that's not exhaustive
but promises not to add any more cases with payloads, but we don't
need that distinction today.
(Note that @objc enums are still "fixed-layout" in the actual sense of
"having a compile-time known layout". There's just no special way to
spell that.)
Existential types don't support nested types so let's not
allow the lookup to make such access, with only exception
for typealias or associated types without type parameters,
they are currently allowed.
Resolves: rdar://problem/38505436
Some of the expressions call into `typeCheckExpressionShallow` while trying to
apply solutions, we need to respect the fact that sub-expressions might be
already properly type-checked while propagating l-value access kind.
Resolves: rdar://problem/38309176
This allows them to be used in generic arguments for NSArray et al.
We already do this for the ones that wrap bridged values (like
NSString/String), but failed to do it for objects that /weren't/
bridged to Swift values (class instances and protocol compositions),
or for Error-which-is-special.
In addition to this being a sensible thing to do, /not/ doing this led
to IRGen getting very confused (i.e. crashing) when we imported a
Objective-C protocol that actually used an NS_TYPED_ENUM in this way.
(We actually shouldn't be using Swift's IRGen logic to emit protocol
descriptors for imported protocols at all, because it's possible we
weren't able to import all the requirements. But that's a separate
issue.)
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-6844
This improves 'ninja check-swift-validation' performance by about 2.9x
on my Linux desktop. Also, move them to validation-test where the other
long tests live.
Even without ASAN this failes with "corrupted double-linked list".
<rdar://problem/35797159> [Associated Type Inference] Swift CI: 1. OSS - Swift ASAN - Ubuntu 16.04 (master) heap-use-after-free ASTContext::getSpecializedConformance llvm::FoldingSetBase::InsertNode
Waiting for a fix for <rdar://35797159> [Associated Type Inference]
Swift CI: 1. OSS - Swift ASAN - Ubuntu 16.04 (master)
heap-use-after-free ASTContext::getSpecializedConformance
llvm::FoldingSetBase::InsertNode
If a type has the same layout as one of the basic integer types, or has a single refcounted pointer representation, we can use prefab value witness tables from the runtime instead of instantiating new ones. This saves quite a bit of code size, particularly in the Apple SDK overlays, where there are lots of swift_newtype wrappers and option set structs.
