Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Saleem Abdulrasool
d281b98220 litter the tree with llvm_unreachable
This silences the instances of the warning from Visual Studio about not all
codepaths returning a value.  This makes the output more readable and less
likely to lose useful warnings.  NFC.
2018-09-13 15:26:14 -07:00
Slava Pestov
b4962e16b5 Sema: Remove setAccess() call from prepareGenericParamList() 2018-09-05 16:50:13 -07:00
Slava Pestov
cdadee8173 AST: Fix layering violations in DefaultAndMaxAccessLevelRequest
Our walk over the requirement interface types meant that
computing the access level of an extension member depended
on type resolution and the GSB.

Fix this by adding a new request that simply collects all
TypeDecls referenced from a TypeRepr, and compute the
extension's maximum access level using that.

If we use Structural rather than Interface type resolution when
walking the extension's requirements, we don't have to build its
generic signature first.
2018-09-05 16:18:54 -07:00
John McCall
b80618fc80 Replace materializeForSet with the modify coroutine.
Most of this patch is just removing special cases for materializeForSet
or other fairly mechanical replacements.  Unfortunately, the rest is
still a fairly big change, and not one that can be easily split apart
because of the quite reasonable reliance on metaprogramming throughout
the compiler.  And, of course, there are a bunch of test updates that
have to be sync'ed with the actual change to code-generation.

This is SR-7134.
2018-08-27 03:24:43 -04:00
Doug Gregor
3c54886c4d [Type checker] Use RequirementRequest::visitRequirements() more intentionally.
Rather than using RequirementRequest::visitRequirements() for its side
effects, then reading from the TypeLocs left behind, start eliminating
TypeLoc-based APIs so we pass Type and TypeRepr separately.

Add some utilities to dig into a possibly-null RequirementRepr* and dig
out the appropriate TypeReprs.
2018-08-23 15:14:19 -07:00
Doug Gregor
7e96f123b9 [Type checker] Make sure we check access of ‘where’ clauses properly. 2018-08-23 13:42:09 -07:00
Harlan Haskins
5a6985f39e Remove SimpleRequest::breakCycle
This patch removes the need for Request objects to provide a default
cycle-breaking value, instead opting to return llvm::Expected so clients
must handle a cycle failure explicitly.

Currently, all clients do the 'default' behavior, but this opens the
possibility for future requests to handle failures explicitly.
2018-08-15 11:01:12 -07:00
Doug Gregor
bd5f5d80e4 [AST] Add ExtensionDecl::getExtendedNominal().
Introduce ExtensionDecl::getExtendedNominal() to provide the nominal
type declaration that the extension declaration extends. Move most
of the existing callers of the callers to getExtendedType() over to
getExtendedNominal(), because they don’t need the full type information.

ExtensionDecl::getExtendedNominal() is itself not very interesting yet,
because it depends on getExtendedType().
2018-08-03 11:26:48 -07:00
John McCall
7a4aeed570 Implement generalized accessors using yield-once coroutines.
For now, the accessors have been underscored as `_read` and `_modify`.
I'll prepare an evolution proposal for this feature which should allow
us to remove the underscores or, y'know, rename them to `purple` and
`lettuce`.

`_read` accessors do not make any effort yet to avoid copying the
value being yielded.  I'll work on it in follow-up patches.

Opaque accesses to properties and subscripts defined with `_modify`
accessors will use an inefficient `materializeForSet` pattern that
materializes the value to a temporary instead of accessing it in-place.
That will be fixed by migrating to `modify` over `materializeForSet`,
which is next up after the `read` optimizations.

SIL ownership verification doesn't pass yet for the test cases here
because of a general fault in SILGen where borrows can outlive their
borrowed value due to being cleaned up on the general cleanup stack
when the borrowed value is cleaned up on the formal-access stack.
Michael, Andy, and I discussed various ways to fix this, but it seems
clear to me that it's not in any way specific to coroutine accesses.

rdar://35399664
2018-07-23 18:59:58 -04:00
Graydon Hoare
465ca073f8 [Sema] Move AccessLevel calculation to AST-level requests. 2018-07-04 16:56:26 -07:00