enforce its own little constraints. The type checker isn't using it for
anything, and it is just clutter.
This resolves <rdar://problem/16656024> Remove @assignment from operator implementations
Swift SVN r19960
Mechanically add "Type" to the end of any protocol names that don't end
in "Type," "ible," or "able." Also, drop "Type" from the end of any
associated type names, except for those of the *LiteralConvertible
protocols.
There are obvious improvements to make in some of these names, which can
be handled with separate commits.
Fixes <rdar://problem/17165920> Protocols `Integer` etc should get
uglier names.
Swift SVN r19883
- Follow LLVM conventions for emacs mode specification
- Use local variables suffix to make the output read-only (at least on
Emacs)
- But drop the admonitions not to edit the generated files;
line-directive mostly takes care of that problem now.
Swift SVN r19381
This just renames the existing "uncheckedAdd" (and related) functions to addWithOverflow. These
were already "checked" and return the partial result + bool that we want.
Swift SVN r19246
Keep calm: remember that the standard library has many more public exports
than the average target, and that this contains ALL of them at once.
I also deliberately tried to tag nearly every top-level decl, even if that
was just to explicitly mark things @internal, to make sure I didn't miss
something.
This does export more than we might want to, mostly for protocol conformance
reasons, along with our simple-but-limiting typealias rule. I tried to also
mark things private where possible, but it's really going to be up to the
standard library owners to get this right. This is also only validated
against top-level access control; I haven't fully tested against member-level
access control yet, and none of our semantic restrictions are in place.
Along the way I also noticed bits of stdlib cruft; to keep this patch
understandable, I didn't change any of them.
Swift SVN r19145
assert() and fatalError()
These functions are meant to be used in user code. They are enabled in debug
mode and disabled in release or fast mode.
_precondition() and _preconditionFailure()
These functions are meant to be used in library code to check preconditions at
the api boundry. They are enabled in debug mode (with a verbose message) and
release mode (trap). In fast mode they are disabled.
_debugPrecondition() and _debugPreconditionFailure()
These functions are meant to be used in library code to check preconditions that
are not neccesarily comprehensive for safety (UnsafePointer can be null or an
invalid pointer but we can't check both). They are enabled only in debug mode.
_sanityCheck() and _fatalError()
These are meant to be used for internal consistency checks. They are only
enabled when the library is build with -DSWIFT_STDLIB_INTERNAL_CHECKS=ON.
I modified the code in the standard library to the best of my judgement.
rdar://16477198
Swift SVN r18212
Before this commit, RandomAccessIndex was a refinement of
NumericOperations, which forced it to support inappropriate operations
such as multiplication. Many obvious random-access index types can't
support multiplication (e.g. a StridedIndex adapter, which moves its
underlying index by N positions for each increment).
Along the way:
* the addition and subtraction operations on RandomAccessIndex were
renamed to advancedBy and distanceTo, which prevents nasty ambiguities
when a type conforms to both RandomAccessIndex and Integer, and allows
Index DistanceTypes to actually be signed integers even when the Index
is unsigned.
* Before this commit, using internal interfaces, it was possible to
request static checking without also getting dynamic checks when
static checking is impossible. Now the relationship between static
and dynamic checking is built into the core protocols.
* NumericOperations.swift was moved into IntegerArithmetic.swift.gyb,
correcting missing operators by generating them programmatically and
in preparation for renaming the protocol to something more appropriate
Fixes
<rdar://problem/16246927> RandomAccessIndex is over-constrained
and possibly:
<rdar://problem/15605729> Make all operators generic over
protocols (in particular, get NumericOperations done)
Swift SVN r14854
