That commit made a protocol public. The protocol was underscored but
some of its APIs were not, and those became unintentionally publicly
visible. This commit corrects that problem. Since Builtin.RawPointer
properties were being renamed from "value" to "_rawValue" for clarity,
COpaquePointer got that treatment too, even though it wasn't strictly
necessary, for consistency.
Swift SVN r22252
240 undocumented public non-operator APIs remain in core
Note: previous estimates were wrong because my regex was broken. The
previous commit, for example, had 260 undocumented APIs.
Swift SVN r22234
The syntax being reverted added busywork and noise to the common case
where you want to say "I have the right address, but the wrong type,"
without adding any real safety.
Also it eliminated the ability to write UnsafePointer<T>(otherPointer),
without adding ".self" to T. Overall, it was not a win.
This reverts commits r21324 and r21342
Swift SVN r21424
Previously, it was possible to write Unsafe[Mutable]Pointer(x) and have
Swift deduce the pointee type based on context. Since reinterpreting
memory is a fundamentally type-unsafe operation, it's better to be
explicit about conversions from Unsafe[Mutable]Pointer<T> to
Unsafe[Mutable]Pointer<U>. This change is consistent with the move from
reinterpretCast(x) to unsafeBitCast(x, T.self).
Also, we've encoded the operations of explicitly adding or removing
mutability as properties, so that adding mutability can be separated
from wild reinterpretCast'ing, a much more severe form of unsafety.
Swift SVN r21324
This also reverts the commit "stdlib: Don't check for overflow in subscript accesses to
ContigousArrayBuffer" as removing the overflow check on all unsafe pointers has
the same effect.
Swift SVN r21220
We overflow checked the mulitplication in "a + sizeof(T) * i". This is not
necessary for ContingousArrayBuffer because this overflow check has happened
when we compute the size of the array during allocation of a native swift array
or a NSArray.
benchmark``````````````,``baserun0``,``optrun2``,``delta,``speedup
Memset`````````````````,``1184.00```,``487.00```,``698.00``,````````143.9%
QuickSort``````````````,``1299.00```,``1458.00``,``178.00``,````````-12.2%
SelectionSort``````````,``1027.00```,``814.00```,``213.00``,````````26.2%
StdlibSort`````````````,``1718.00```,``1587.00``,``127.00``,````````8.0%
Walsh``````````````````,``1160.00```,``1076.00``,``86.00```,````````8.1%
XorLoop````````````````,``1248.00```,``884.00```,``369.00``,````````42.0%
The regression in quicksort is noise - i looked at the LLVM IR and the only
thing different in the graph is that we have removed the mulitplication with
overflow check (that is - we should be running faster). Same thing looking at
the assembly.
XorLoop and Memset speed up because we are now able to vectorize those loops.
Swift SVN r21218
Primarily, this means becoming resilient to Builtin.strideof(x) == 0.
Pretty much the only way to get pointers and arrays to make sense is to
treat zero-sized elements as having a stride of 1, so we do that in our
wrapper for Builtin.strideof. Other points include precondition checks
for radixes in number formatting.
Fixes <rdar://problem/17097768>
Swift SVN r20242
There's no meaningful way in which these methods are public, since they
can't be accessed through any value of the type
<rdar://problem/17647878>
Swift SVN r20224
enforce its own little constraints. The type checker isn't using it for
anything, and it is just clutter.
This resolves <rdar://problem/16656024> Remove @assignment from operator implementations
Swift SVN r19960
Mechanically add "Type" to the end of any protocol names that don't end
in "Type," "ible," or "able." Also, drop "Type" from the end of any
associated type names, except for those of the *LiteralConvertible
protocols.
There are obvious improvements to make in some of these names, which can
be handled with separate commits.
Fixes <rdar://problem/17165920> Protocols `Integer` etc should get
uglier names.
Swift SVN r19883
The one design choice here was whether to expose the pointee directly through the Mirror
My choice was against that. Instead, we present UnsafePointer as UnsafePointer(0x123) and the child we expose is the 0x123 numeric pointer value
The other option, of course, would be to present it as UnsafePointer(reflect(memory)) - but that seems risky to do by default
UnsafePointers are allowed to be in, guess what, unsafe states, and the stakes of having playgrounds try and dereference at all times are quite too high.
If the user really wants to reflect the pointee reflect(pointer.memory) will do it for them - and then any crashes will be theirs to enjoy.
Of course, I am very open to arguments as to why reflect(memory) would be a better choice.
Swift SVN r19386
- Follow LLVM conventions for emacs mode specification
- Use local variables suffix to make the output read-only (at least on
Emacs)
- But drop the admonitions not to edit the generated files;
line-directive mostly takes care of that problem now.
Swift SVN r19381
As before, there may be more things marked @public than we actually want
public. Judicious use of the frontend option -disable-access-control may
help reduce the public surface area of the stdlib.
Swift SVN r19353
Give UnsafePointer versions of CMutablePointer._setIfNonNil and _withBridgeObject/Value. Also provide a version of 'withUnsafePointer' as a staging aid so that UnsafePointer can be used in place of CMutablePointer.
Swift SVN r19215
Keep calm: remember that the standard library has many more public exports
than the average target, and that this contains ALL of them at once.
I also deliberately tried to tag nearly every top-level decl, even if that
was just to explicitly mark things @internal, to make sure I didn't miss
something.
This does export more than we might want to, mostly for protocol conformance
reasons, along with our simple-but-limiting typealias rule. I tried to also
mark things private where possible, but it's really going to be up to the
standard library owners to get this right. This is also only validated
against top-level access control; I haven't fully tested against member-level
access control yet, and none of our semantic restrictions are in place.
Along the way I also noticed bits of stdlib cruft; to keep this patch
understandable, I didn't change any of them.
Swift SVN r19145
This is motivated by <rdar://problem/17051606>.
This ends up renaming variables as well, which seems right for
consistency since we use "predicate" as variable name.
Swift SVN r19135
