Let's say I am a good citizen and document my private symbols:
/** My TOP SECRET DOCUMENTATION */
private class Foo {
}
When I go to distribute the compiled binary, I find out my private
documentation is distributed as well:
$ swiftc test.swift -emit-module -module-name "test"
$ strings test.swiftdoc
My TOP SECRET DOCUMENTATION
/** My TOP SECRET DOCUMENTATION */
If a client can't use a symbol (e.g. it's private [or internal and not
-enable-testing]) don't emit the documentation for a symbol in the
swiftdoc.
Fixes: SR-762, rdar://21453624
The test coverage implements this truth table:
| visibility | -enable-testing | documentation? |
|------------|-----------------|----------------|
| private | no | ❌ |
| internal | no | ❌ |
| public | no | ✅ |
| private | yes | ❌ |
| internal | yes | ✅ |
| public | yes | ✅ |
Modified the existing comments test coverage to expect non-public
documentation not to be emitted.
Don't rely on existing comment structure
Refuse to emit comments if the decl cannot actually have one. To
accomplish this, we move `canHaveComment` into the Decl instance. It
must also be marked `const`, since one of its existing usages operates
on a const pointer.
Perform fewer checks when serializing the standard library.
Most tests were using %swift or similar substitutions, which did not
include the target triple and SDK. The driver was defaulting to the
host OS. Thus, we could not run the tests when the standard library was
not built for OS X.
Swift SVN r24504
