Accessors logically belong to their storage and can be synthesized
on the fly, so removing them from the members list eliminates one
source of mutability (but doesn't eliminate it; there are also
witnesses for derived conformances, and implicit constructors).
Since a few ASTWalker implementations break in non-trivial ways when
the traversal is changed to visit accessors as children of the storage
rather than peers, I hacked up the ASTWalker to optionally preserve
the old traversal order for now. This is ugly and needs to be cleaned up,
but I want to avoid breaking _too_ much with this commit.
Once accessors are no longer listed as members of their parent context,
a failure to deserialize a VarDecl or SubscriptDecl needs to create a
MissingMemberDecl with the total number of vtable entries expected for
all of the accessors of the storage.
Note that until the accessor change actually lands, we always compute
the expected number of vtable entries as 0.
...which allows the AST printer to correctly choose whether to print
it, which means it can be printed in a module interface in a non-WMO
build, which is necessary for @objc enums to have a correct run-time
representation when clients use that interface.
rdar://problem/53469608
Previously we would copy this attribute from a superclass to the
subclass when validating a subclass. However, this is only correct
if the superclass is always guaranteed to have been validated
before the subclass.
Indeed, it appears this assumption is no longer true, so we would
sometimes lose track of the attribute, which would result in SILGen
failing to emit the ivar initializer entry point.
Instead, check for the attribute as part of the superclass walk
in checkAncestry(), ensuring the result is always up to date, correct,
and cached.
As a follow-up, we should also convert checkAncestry() into a
request, but I'm not doing that here to keep the fix short.
Fixes <rdar://problem/50845438>.
The Bitstream part of Bitcode moved to llvm/Bitstream in LLVM. This
updates the uses in swift.
See r365091 [Bitcode] Move Bitstream to a separate library.
If a protocol inherits from a protocol that can't be loaded, drop it
entirely. Similarly, if it has requirements that reference types in
other modules that can't be loaded, drop the protocol entirely---at
least for now, we don't want to deal with a protocol that exists but
has the wrong requirement signature. That "in other modules" isn't
perfect, but it avoids cases where two protocols depend on each other.
Unfortunately, it means the compiler may still get into exactly the
situation above if a protocol depends on another protocol in the same
module, and /that/ protocol can't be loaded for some other reason. But
it's progress.
This comes up when referencing implementation-only-imported protocols
from non-public protocols, but is also just general deserialization
recovery goodness.
rdar://problem/52141347
When the outermost property wrapper associated with a property has a
`wrapperValue`, create the projection property (with the `$` prefix)
at the same access level as the original property. This puts the
wrapped-value interface and the projection interface at the same level.
The newly-introduced @_projectionValueProperty attribute is implicitly
created to establish the link between the original property and the
projection value within module interfaces, where both properties will
be explicitly written out.
We don't need to serialize the protocol's superclass, we can compute it from the
generic signature. Previously, we would drop the superclass while
serializing because we didn't check the generic signature in
SuperclassTypeRequest, which would cause us to cache `NULL` when we
called `setSuperclass` for a protocol with a superclass constraint.
Fixes rdar://50526401
...well, at least a little more than before. This /still/ isn't as
strong as the switch that used to be here because a subtype of an
existing Decl or Type won't show up, but that's probably still worth
the maintainability (and backtrace) tradeoff.
That is, if a struct's generic requirements can't be deserialized,
drop the struct. This is the same logic that's already in play for
enums and (as of the previous commit) classes, so it should be pretty
well tested by now. (Hence the sole test I'm adding here, snuck into
superclass.swift because it's a superclass /constraint/ being tested.)
I don't know of any outstanding issues caused by this, but it was
weird to have it for enums and classes but not structs, so here we
are.
...instead of crashing. Also drop the class if its generic
requirements depend on a type that can't be loaded (instead of
crashing).
rdar://problem/50125674
These can be recreated if needed in a client library. To do this, I've
added a new ConformanceLookupKind::NonInherited, which can also be
used elsewhere in the project where we're already filtering out
inherited conformances some other way.
Note that this doesn't drop inherited conformances from the entire
serialized interface, just from the list that a class explicitly
declares. They still get referenced sometimes.
rdar://problem/50541451 and possibly others
Computing the requirement signature created the generic params as
a side effect. Making getRequirementSignature lazy means that users
of the generic params must make sure they are created before use.
Serialize the relationship between a property that has an attached delegate
and its backing variable, so deserialization can reestablish that link.
Fixes rdar://problem/50447022.
Dependency tracking for cached compiled modules (compiled from
swiftinterfaces) can lead to a high percentage of the module being
SDK-relative paths when -track-system-dependencies is on. Cut down on
this by storing directory names in a separate record that gets
referenced from each file dependency. (Since a lot of per-file
dependencies are header files in a common directory, this is a win.)
We can do something more clever in the future, but this is a
reasonable start for, say, the overlays.
rdar://problem/50449802
Fix a trio of issues involving mangling for opaque result types:
* Symbolic references to opaque type descriptors are not substitutions
* Mangle protocol extension contexts correctly
* Mangle generic arguments for opaque result types of generic functions
The (de-)serialization of generic parameter lists for opaque type
declarations is important for the last bullet, to ensure that the
mangling of generic arguments of opaque result types works across
module boundaries.
Fixes the rest of rdar://problem/50038754.
When printing a swiftinterface, represent opaque result types using an attribute that refers to
the mangled name of the defining decl for the opaque type. To turn this back into a reference
to the right decl's implicit OpaqueTypeDecl, use type reconstruction. Since type reconstruction
doesn't normally concern itself with non-type decls, set up a lookup table in SourceFiles and
ModuleFiles to let us handle the mapping from mangled name to opaque type decl in type
reconstruction.
(Since we're invoking type reconstruction during type checking, when the module hasn't yet been
fully validated, we need to plumb a LazyResolver into the ASTBuilder in an unsightly way. Maybe
there's a better way to do this... Longer term, at least, this surface design gives space for
doing things more the right way--a more request-ified decl validator ought to be able to naturally
lazily service this request without the LazyResolver reference, and if type reconstruction in
the future learns how to reconstruct non-type decls, then the lookup tables can go away.)
To represent the abstracted interface of an opaque type, we need a generic signature that refines
the outer context generic signature with an additional generic parameter representing the underlying
type and its exposed constraints. Opaque types also need to be keyed by their originating decl, so
that we can treat values of the same opaque type as the same. When we check a FuncDecl with an
opaque type specified as its return type, create an OpaqueTypeDecl and associate it with the
originating decl. (A representation for *types* derived from the opaque decl will come next.)
