where overloading based on the indices is insufficient to select an
overload candidate. Implement type coercion for overloaded subscript
expressions, so that the context can help push overload resolution
along.
Swift SVN r1516
to the type named by A (when A is in fact a direct reference to a
type). If that coercion would fail, then fall back to invoking a
constructor. Fixes <rdar://problem/11272190>.
Swift SVN r1472
member of an object. This expression kind is currently used to refer
to properties within an object, but will eventually be extended to
refer to fields as well (once we make StructDecl real).
Swift SVN r1445
syntax when name lookup finds multiple candidates. Overload resolution
is then used to select the best candidate and map the overloaded
member reference expression down to DotSyntaxCallExpr or
DotSyntaxBaseIgnoredExpr, as appropriate.
This implements part of <rdar://problem/11071641>, so that simple
overload resolution works, but there is still a bit of cleanup to do.
Swift SVN r1366
notion of a reference to a set of declarations. Introduce one derived
class, OverloadedDeclRefExpr, which covers the only case we currently
handle for overload resolution [*]: a direct (unqualified) reference
to an overloaded set of entities. Future subclasses should handle,
e.g., overloaded member references such as a.b or a.b.c.
[*] Ugly hacks for static methods notwithstanding
Swift SVN r1345
qualifier, making sure that variables end up so-qualified by
default. Add a RequalifyExpr to capture the act of adding
qualifiers (to form a supertype) to an l-value.
Swift SVN r1236
to properly represent its newly generalized role. It is formed
for things like "swift.print" where swift is a module type and is
evaluated and ignored.
Swift SVN r1230
- introduce the concept of qualifiers on l-value types
- teach overload resolution and coercion how to drop explicitness
- require explicitness on normal [byref] arguments
- make 'this' [byref(implicit)]
- special-case '&' as a unary operator in the parser to make it
produce an expression which type-checks as turning implicit l-values
into explicit ones.
Obvious missing pieces:
- updating LangRef
- we should really complain about ever trying to rvalue-convert an
explicit l-value
- maybe qualification should play a part in overload resolution
- we should diagnose attempts to declare unary '&' operators
- there's a test case in expressions.swift which suggests my logic is
slightly off
But I am out of time, and these will have to wait.
Swift SVN r1119
inconsistent (so it needs to be killed) but that we want to retain source
range information and not kill the entire subtree that contains it.
Swift SVN r1073
a tuple with one element and no labels. This form is
treated specially in essentially every case, so it might
as well be its own expression kind.
Swift SVN r1021
