A follow-up PR adds a flag to control an inline namespace that allows
symbols in libDemangling to be distinguished between the runtime and
the compiler. These dependencies ensure that the flag is plumbed
through for inclusions of Demangling headers that aren't already
covered by existing `target_link_libraries`.
This avoids us having to pattern match every source file which should
help speed up the CMake generation. A secondary optimization is
possible with CMake 3.14 which has the ability to remove the last
extension component without having to resort to regular expressions. It
also helps easily identify the GYB'ed sources.
These changes allow to optionally perform a very fast build that is targeted to only produce the syntax parser library.
Part of addressing rdar://48153331
This is a follow up to the discussion on #22740 to switch the host
libraries to use the `target_link_libraries` rather than the
`LINK_LIBRARIES` special handling. This allows the dependency to be
properly tracked by CMake and allows us to use the more modern syntax.
This reverts commit 121f5b64be.
Sorry to revert this again. This commit makes some pretty big changes. After
messing with the merge-conflict created by this internally, I did not feel
comfortable landing this now. I talked with Saleem and he agreed with me that
this was the right thing to do.
The key thing here is that all of the underlying code is exactly the same. I
purposely did not debride anything. This is to ensure that I am not touching too
much and increasing the probability of weird errors from occurring. Thus the
exact same code should be executed... just the routing changed.
It is more efficient than llvm::AppendingBinaryByteStream if a lot of
small data gets appended to it because it doesn't need to resize its
buffer on each write.
Meant as a replacement for the barely-started iterative type checker,
introduce a simpler "evaluator" that can evaluate individual requests
(essentially, function objects with some additional API), caching
results as appropriate and detecting cycles.
Restore the use of `UuidFromStringA`. This avoids the unnecessary
round-tripping through mbtowcs and the dynamic allocation. It also
fixes the UUID parsing, enabling tests to work on Windows.
This reverts commit 9414f46731.
Previously it was part of swiftBasic.
The demangler library does not depend on llvm (except some header-only utilities like StringRef). Putting it into its own library makes sure that no llvm stuff will be linked into clients which use the demangler library.
This change also contains other refactoring, like moving demangler code into different files. This makes it easier to remove the old demangler from the runtime library when we switch to the new symbol mangling.
Also in this commit: remove some unused API functions from the demangler Context.
fixes rdar://problem/30503344
These changes caused a number of issues:
1. No debug info is emitted when a release-debug info compiler is built.
2. OS X deployment target specification is broken.
3. Swift options were broken without any attempt any recreating that
functionality. The specific option in question is --force-optimized-typechecker.
Such refactorings should be done in a fashion that does not break existing
users and use cases.
This reverts commit e6ce2ff388.
This reverts commit e8645f3750.
This reverts commit 89b038ea7e.
This reverts commit 497cac64d9.
This reverts commit 953ad094da.
This reverts commit e096d1c033.
rdar://30549345
This patch splits add_swift_library into two functions one which handles
the simple case of adding a library that is part of the compiler being
built and the second handling the more complicated case of "target"
libraries, which may need to build for one or more targets.
The new add_swift_library is built using llvm_add_library, which re-uses
LLVM's CMake modules. In adapting to use LLVM's modules some of
add_swift_library's named parameters have been removed and
LINK_LIBRARIES has changed to LINK_LIBS, and LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS
changed to LINK_COMPONENTS.
This patch also cleans up libswiftBasic's handling of UUID library and
headers, and how it interfaces with gyb sources.
add_swift_library also no longer has the FILE_DEPENDS parameter, which
doesn't matter because llvm_add_library's DEPENDS parameter has the same
behavior.
Following classes provide symbol mangling for specific purposes:
*) Mangler: the base mangler class, just providing some basic utilities
*) ASTMangler: for mangling AST declarations
*) SpecializationMangler: to be used in the optimizer for mangling specialized function names
*) IRGenMangler: mangling all kind of symbols in IRGen
All those classes are not used yet, so it’s basically a NFC.
Another change is that some demangler node types are added (either because they were missing or the new demangler needs them).
Those new nodes also need to be handled in the old demangler, but this should also be a NFC as those nodes are not created by the old demangler.
My plan is to keep the old and new mangling implementation in parallel for some time. After that we can remove the old mangler.
Currently the new implementation is scoped in the NewMangling namespace. This namespace should be renamed after the old mangler is removed.
Now that I am going to be adding an IN_SWIFT_COMPONENT argument, I need to do
this to distinguish the concepts of an LLVM_COMPONENT and a SWIFT_COMPONENT.
As a first step to allowing the build script to build *only*
static library versions of the stdlib, change `add_swift_library`
such that callers must pass in `SHARED`, `STATIC`, or `OBJECT_LIBRARY`.
Ideally, only these flags would be used to determine whether to
build shared, static, or object libraries, but that is not currently
the case -- `add_swift_library` also checks whether the library
`IS_STDLIB` before performing certain additional actions. This will be
cleaned up in a future commit.
Swift relies on this for now. So create our own. This makes more sense
than trying to add back in the API (which is dead besides the c api) or
use the c api itself. We should probably consider not using a global
context like this.
This times each phase of compilation, so you can see where time is being
spent. This doesn't cover all of compilation, but does get all the major
work being done.
Note that these times are non-overlapping, and should stay that way.
If we add more timers, they should go in a different timer group, so we
don't end up double-counting.
Based on a patch by @cwillmor---thanks, Chris!
Example output, from an -Onone build using a debug compiler:
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
Swift compilation
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
Total Execution Time: 8.7215 seconds (8.7779 wall clock)
---User Time--- --System Time-- --User+System-- ---Wall Time--- --- Name ---
2.6670 ( 30.8%) 0.0180 ( 25.3%) 2.6850 ( 30.8%) 2.7064 ( 30.8%) Type checking / Semantic analysis
1.9381 ( 22.4%) 0.0034 ( 4.8%) 1.9415 ( 22.3%) 1.9422 ( 22.1%) AST verification
1.0746 ( 12.4%) 0.0089 ( 12.5%) 1.0834 ( 12.4%) 1.0837 ( 12.3%) SILGen
0.8468 ( 9.8%) 0.0171 ( 24.0%) 0.8638 ( 9.9%) 0.8885 ( 10.1%) IRGen
0.6595 ( 7.6%) 0.0142 ( 20.0%) 0.6737 ( 7.7%) 0.6739 ( 7.7%) LLVM output
0.6449 ( 7.5%) 0.0019 ( 2.6%) 0.6468 ( 7.4%) 0.6469 ( 7.4%) SIL verification (pre-optimization)
0.3505 ( 4.1%) 0.0023 ( 3.2%) 0.3528 ( 4.0%) 0.3530 ( 4.0%) SIL optimization
0.2632 ( 3.0%) 0.0005 ( 0.7%) 0.2637 ( 3.0%) 0.2639 ( 3.0%) SIL verification (post-optimization)
0.0718 ( 0.8%) 0.0021 ( 3.0%) 0.0739 ( 0.8%) 0.0804 ( 0.9%) Parsing
0.0618 ( 0.7%) 0.0010 ( 1.4%) 0.0628 ( 0.7%) 0.0628 ( 0.7%) LLVM optimization
0.0484 ( 0.6%) 0.0011 ( 1.5%) 0.0495 ( 0.6%) 0.0495 ( 0.6%) Serialization (swiftmodule)
0.0240 ( 0.3%) 0.0006 ( 0.9%) 0.0246 ( 0.3%) 0.0267 ( 0.3%) Serialization (swiftdoc)
0.0000 ( 0.0%) 0.0000 ( 0.0%) 0.0000 ( 0.0%) 0.0000 ( 0.0%) Name binding
8.6505 (100.0%) 0.0710 (100.0%) 8.7215 (100.0%) 8.7779 (100.0%) Total
