We used to compute the init kind from the overridden declaration;
this was switched to use the base declaration in 42f72cb0d.
Refactor the init kind computation a little to get the old behavior
back. Otherwise, if a class defines an initializer named -init, we
always import it as designated by virtue of overridding NSObject's
-init.
Fixes <rdar://problem/56674158>.
The only thing this was used for is to test if the total number of
parameters was 1, in which case we did the same thing we did for a
first parameter except in one very contrived case: a method with more
than one parameter whose base name starts with "set" and whose first
parameter is an NSZone. There are zero of these in the macOS or iOS
SDKs, and probably even fewer in third-party code.
Previously we only did this for factory methods, but there's no reason
why we can't do it for regular init methods too, and doing so
simplifies the signature of SwiftDeclConverter::importConstructor.
Also remove some indirection through helper functions in ClangAdapter.
These were more useful back when Swift looked directly at API notes
instead of relying on Clang turning them into attributes; now they're
just an extra hop for no reason.
`tok.getLiteralData()` does not work for a macro imported from a clang module (returns `nullptr`), while `getSpellingOfSingleCharacterNumericConstant` covers both kinds of macros (defined in source or imported from a module).
Unfortunately this currently only matters for an internal tool so I cannot accompany this change with a test case.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
...rather than by whether they're implicit. We're planning to make
them explicit (prompted by a change in upstream Clang that no longer
prints implicit attributes).
rdar://problem/40346997 (Swift side)
LLVM r334399 (and related Clang changes) moved clang::VersionTuple to
llvm::VersionTuple. Update Swift to match.
Patch by Jason Molenda.
rdar://problem/41025046
...instead of relying on the one in the overlay in pre-4.2 versions of
Swift. This caused crashes in deserialization, which (deliberately)
doesn't respect availability.
There are three changes here:
- Remove UIEdgeInsets.zero and UIOffset.zero from the UIKit overlay.
- Always use the 4.2 name for UIEdgeInsetsZero and UIOffsetZero from
the underlying UIKit framework. (This is the nested name.)
- Ignore the unavailability messages for those two constants in
pre-4.2 Swift, since we're now relying on them being present.
The latter two, the compiler changes, can go away once UIKit's API
notes no longer specify different pre-4.2 behavior, but meanwhile we
need to keep compatibility with the SDKs released in Xcode 10b1.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-7879
If the Clang declrations are *types*, canonical declaration in Swift is
imported for newest version of Swift. In interface generation, if the
declaration is versioned and it's imported as a member in either or both
version of Swift, we have to take compatibility typealias into account.
* Fixed 'ClangModuleUnit::getTopLevelDecls' to take isCompatibilityAlias() into account
* Fixed bugs in ClangImporter where member-to-member versioned types aren't properly imported.
* Fixed 'SwiftDeclConverter::importFullName' to check equality of getEffectiveContext()
* Fixed 'importer::addEntryToLookupTable' to check equality of getEffectiveContext()
(moved 'ClangImporter::Implementation::forEachDistinctName' to 'NameImporter')
Still to do: test and fix up the use of multiple enum_extensibility
annotations, possibly with API notes. This is important because the
definition of NS/CF_ENUM /includes/ enum_extensibility(open) as of
Xcode 9.0; there should be a convenient out people can use to declare
exhaustive enums in C that's backwards-compatible.
Swift's ASTContext contained all of the logic to find the complete list
of properties for an Objective-C class, which is used by the Clang importer
to influence the mapping of Objective-C names into Swift. Swift's
ASTContext also included a *cache* for this information, indexed by
the Clang `ObjCInterfaceDecl *`. However, this cache was getting
populated/queried from the Clang importer's name importer, such that
the keys would be Clang declarations used to build modules and then
deallocated. If that memory eventually gets reused for a different
`ObjCInterfaceDecl *`, we would get incorrect/stale all-properties
information.
Almost Surely fixes rdar://problem/35347167, which is a
nondeterministic failure where UIView's `addGestureRecognizer(_:)` gets
occasionally imported as `add(_:)`.
*** Depends on Clang change "[APINotes] Record what version caused ***
*** an annotation to get replaced." Update your Clang checkout! ***
More generally, change the meaning of the SwiftVersions section in API
notes to be "this version or earlier" rather than "exactly this
version". We mostly get this behavior for free from the Clang-side
changes, but for SwiftName and the enum annotations we look at inactive
attributes as well. The latter is simple, but the former means being
careful about finding the annotation we /would/ have picked, i.e. the
one closest to the version we requested.
...so that we don't have to keep coming back to update it every major
release. And also so we can actually put methods on it instead of
using free functions.
No intended behavior change (yet).
Preparation for making ImportNameVersion a generalized struct rather
than an enum. We could have kept cramming it into a bitfield, sure,
but we don't actually need this.
No intended functionality change.
The etymology of these terms isn't about race, but "black" = "blocked"
and "white" = "allowed" isn't really a good look these days. In most
cases we weren't using these terms particularly precisely anyway, so
the rephrasing is actually an improvement.
This would fail later down the line anyway, meaning this does not
change the ultimate behavior of the importer, but since I added an
assertion that we're expecting a definition here in 2c68f8d49d, we
need to avoid even asking the question.
Also fix up a few other places where we aren't sure we'll have a
definition when calling these functions.
rdar://problem/33784466
Printing a declaration's name using `<<` and `getBaseName()` is be
independent of the return type of `getBaseName()` which will change in
the future from `Identifier` to `DeclBaseName`
Also lays the groundwork for rdar://problem/16513537, which is about
being able to find an enum by its original top-level name so that we
can show a diagnostic for that. I'll file a public bug about that
later.
rdar://problem/31893305
