Constructor call patterns already get a real priority, but because of
the way we do function call patterns we don't have enough information,
and previously we were setting it to "expression specific", which is
unnecessarily high, particularly since functions (unlike inits) have
other better ways to code-complete already.
rdar://31113161
When completing
Foo(<here>
We will now provide
bar: <#value#>
instead of
bar: <#value#>)
Inserting the rparen caused some problems in practice:
* the old behaviour optimized for typing Foo(<complete> instead of
Foo(<complete>), which can conflict with user behaviours or ...
* in editors with automatic brace-matching, we often conflicted with the
editor, leading to extraneous closing parens
And in general, it is much more predictable for tooling to either insert
matching ( and ) or to not insert either. While this change may not be
ideal For users of editors that do not do automatic brace-matching, I
believe it is still better overall to have to type a missing paren than
to have to delete an extraneous one.
rdar://31113161
The original hope was we could make these heuristics really good, but
since that is not currently in sight (and may never be), we want to be
able to turn them off. For now, just plumb through an internal flag to
control the behaviour. A future change will customize the behaviour in
SourceKit.
rdar://31113161
Except GenericEnvironment.h, because you can't meaningfully use a
GenericEnvironment without its signature. Lots less depends on
GenericSignature.h now. NFC
... and UnicodeScalar, which is technically more correct than only
showing it for String. This also happens to workaround a bug where we
won't show "" for string.contains.
rdar://problem/34746368
In one place we were calling hasError() and in another directly checking
for ErrorType; if we had a type containing an ErrorType as a structural
component, we would hit an assertion.
We have a hack where we use the ParsedDecl as the DeclContext,
to handle completion during function signature parsing, which
happens before the FuncDecl has been created.
While fixing this properly would require a bigger change to the
parser and AST, for now we just check if the ParsedDecl is a
child context of CurDeclContext, and only use it then.
The etymology of these terms isn't about race, but "black" = "blocked"
and "white" = "allowed" isn't really a good look these days. In most
cases we weren't using these terms particularly precisely anyway, so
the rephrasing is actually an improvement.
"Accessibility" has a different meaning for app developers, so we've
already deliberately excised it from our diagnostics in favor of terms
like "access control" and "access level". Do the same in the compiler
now that we aren't constantly pulling things into the release branch.
Rename AccessibilityAttr to AccessControlAttr and
SetterAccessibilityAttr to SetterAccessAttr, then track down the last
few uses of "accessibility" that don't have to do with
NSAccessibility. (I left the SourceKit XPC API alone because that's
supposed to be more stable.)
"Accessibility" has a different meaning for app developers, so we've
already deliberately excised it from our diagnostics in favor of terms
like "access control" and "access level". Do the same in the compiler
now that we aren't constantly pulling things into the release branch.
This commit changes the 'Accessibility' enum to be named 'AccessLevel'.
When completing in an if/while/guard statement condition that expects a
boolean, add the code-completion type relation for Bool. We already had
this for repeat-while.
rdar://problem/26509084
Complete generic parameters and their members inside generic where
clauses on structs, classes, enums, extensions, typealiases, funcs,
subscripts and inits.
Still not handled correctly are associatedtypes.
rdar://problem/20582394
For normal completions it behaves the same as PostfixExprBeginning, but
it provides a hook for clients to provide a custom completion for this
position. For example, you might want to a x ..< y snippet in this
position.
rdar://problem/29910383
When using completion options that will allow the lone "." completion,
provide that result when in contexts that expect an enum type. Note:
this is a crappy approximationg for whether the type can have "implicit
member expression" syntax, since uninhabited enums should not support
it, and many non-enum types should. However, it is currently expensive
to compute the accurate answer and this approximation is good enough for
some clients.
rdar://problem/31260505
AnyFunctionType::Param carries around information about decomposed
parameters now. Information about default arguments must be computed
separately with swift::computeDefaultMap.
With the introduction of special decl names, `Identifier getName()` on
`ValueDecl` will be removed and pushed down to nominal declarations
whose name is guaranteed not to be special. Prepare for this by calling
to `DeclBaseName getBaseName()` instead where appropriate.
This changes `getBaseName()` on `DeclName` to return a `DeclBaseName`
instead of an `Identifier`. All places that will continue to be
expecting an `Identifier` are changed to call `getBaseIdentifier` which
will later assert that the `DeclName` is actually backed by an
identifier and not a special name.
For transitional purposes, a conversion operator from `DeclBaseName` to
`Identifier` has been added that will be removed again once migration
to DeclBaseName has been completed in other parts of the compiler.
Unify approach to printing declaration names
Printing a declaration's name using `<<` and `getBaseName()` is be
independent of the return type of `getBaseName()` which will change in
the future from `Identifier` to `DeclBaseName`
As such, we no longer insert two placeholders for initializers that
need two vtable slots; instead we record that in the
MissingMemberDecl. I can see MissingMemberDecl growing to be something
we'd actually show to users, that can be used for other kinds of
declarations that don't have vtable entries, but for now I'm not going
to worry about any of that.
Replace `NameOfType foo = dyn_cast<NameOfType>(bar)` with DRY version `auto foo = dyn_cast<NameOfType>(bar)`.
The DRY auto version is by far the dominant form already used in the repo, so this PR merely brings the exceptional cases (redundant repetition form) in line with the dominant form (auto form).
See the [C++ Core Guidelines](https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#es11-use-auto-to-avoid-redundant-repetition-of-type-names) for a general discussion on why to use `auto` to avoid redundant repetition of type names.
Add a 'hasExplicitAnyObject()' bit to ProtocolCompositionType
to represent canonical composition types containing '& AnyObject'.
Serialize this bit and take it into account when building
ExistentialLayouts.
Rename ProtocolCompositionType::getProtocols() to getMembers()
since it can contain classes now, and update a few usages that
need further attention with FIXMEs or asserts.
For now, nothing actually constructs these types, and they will
trigger arounds asserts. Upcoming patches will introduce support
for this.
Previously, we ignoring 'let', so you would get ridiculous completions:
let var foo: Int
override let func bar() {}
Now, will complete protocol requirements after 'let' the same way we do
for 'var'. For instance property overrides, we only show them if the
'override' keyword is specified. You can't actually override using a
'let', but if the keyword is present then the intention is clear and we
can let the user fix it afterwards when the compiler diagnoses it.
rdar://problem/31091172
A lot of files transitively include Expr.h, because it was
included from SILInstruction.h, SILLocation.h and SILDeclRef.h.
However in reality most of these files don't do anything
with Exprs, especially not anything in IRGen or the SILOptimizer.
Now we're down to 171 files in the frontend which depend on
Expr.h, which is still a lot but much better than before.
When we are getting completions for an initializer at the open
parenthesis, as in:
class C {
func foo<S: Sequence>(x: S) {
String(#^A^#
}
}
after getting all of the overloads for String.init or other applicable
completions for the expression, we leave the stateful expression type
set when performing the last part of code completion, which is getting
other visible declarations at that point.
In this example, C.foo is available to call. However, if the expression
type is left around, we will mistakenly try to use it to substitute
generics of the found declaration, which doesn't make sense, because
foo is a method on C, not String in this case.
We really need to make this part of the compiler less stateful in
the future, or at least formalize the state changes more. It might
also make sense to further separate different kinds of completions
and the mechanisms for getting types, as we reuse the same machinery
for methods and module functions, making a lot of fallback assumptions.
rdar://problem/30137466
