Completely mechanical changes:
- Explicit @objc in a few places
- Some imported APIs changed
- For the mix-and-match tests, just test version 4/5 instead of 3/4
LLDB needs the -swift-version because the -D__swift__ macro affects
how Clang modules are built. This currently has the really odd effect
that when debugging a Swift program that is not using the very latest
Swift version, the first "po" takes several seconds, because the
module cache needs to be rebuilt.
rdar://problem/40241256
This is in preparation for fetching informations directly from
the module instead of specifying them on the cmdline. It will
serve us better as it will mimick more accurately the way lldb
is behaving.
This refactoring moves the validation of the modules earlier
so that we can use the validation info to create the CompileUnit.
<rdar://problem/38867076>
...with a better message than the generic "older version of the
compiler" one, when we know it's actually a different version of
Swift proper.
This still uses the same internal module version numbers to check
if the module is compatible; the presentation of language versions
is a diagnostic thing only.
Speaking of module version numbers, this deliberately does NOT
increment VERSION_MINOR; it's implemented in a backwards-compatible
way.
This will only work going forwards, of course; all existing modules
don't have a short version string, and I don't feel comfortable
assuming all older modules we might encounter are "Swift 2.2".
rdar://problem/25680392
and link it properly. This is needed to embed LLVM bitcode sections
in the standard library and overlays. The linker doesn't support
embedded bitcode and reexport flags (among others).
rdar://problem/20750099
Swift SVN r28052
This is mainly for the debugger's use, to set up CompilerInvocations that
match how a particular app was compiled in certain important ways. Today
that's the target (which is also in the binary), the SDK path (which in
the long run should probably be an SDK name), and any random -Xcc options
we need to pass (which we should probably attempt to minimize).
Because there's only one target and SDK per context, and because -Xcc
options can easily conflict, this is only intended to be used once per
CompilerInvocation.
Note that search paths are not covered by this; they are already being
added at the time the module is loaded. See r24545.
Completes rdar://problem/17670778.
Swift SVN r25227
...so that the debugger has the best possible chance of being able to load
the app properly.
We don't do this for frameworks today because we don't want to leak this
information into the public module; once we have a distinction between
"the module that ships with the framework" and "the module that goes into
the debug info" we can do this for frameworks as well.
Part of rdar://problem/17670778
Swift SVN r25204
Most tests were using %swift or similar substitutions, which did not
include the target triple and SDK. The driver was defaulting to the
host OS. Thus, we could not run the tests when the standard library was
not built for OS X.
Swift SVN r24504
Doing so is safe even though we have mock SDK. The include paths for
modules with the same name in the real and mock SDKs are different, and
the module files will be distinct (because they will have a different
hash).
This reduces test runtime on OS X by 30% and brings it under a minute on
a 16-core machine.
This also uncovered some problems with some tests -- even when run for
iOS configurations, some tests would still run with macosx triple. I
fixed the tests where I noticed this issue.
rdar://problem/19125022
Swift SVN r23683
Rather than embed AST info directly in binaries, we now include a special
symbol table entry that points to the serialized AST as a separate file.
This requires a very recent version of ld.
We still want to support the __SWIFT,__ast section in a binary because
that's how it's modeled in dSYM, so manually test both modes in
ASTSection_linker.swift.
Part of <rdar://problem/15796201>.
Swift SVN r20421
