This is a new warning in clang when you use @import in a framework header. That’s often a mistake, but it isn’t in our generated -Swift.h headers. If we’re building with a clang that supports this warning, we’ll now emit a pragma to disable it.
One last bit of SE-0072. We shouldn't fall back to bridged classes in the absence of type context for literals anymore. By itself, this kind of hoses the use of literals with NS types, but I think we can get most of the QoI back with overlay changes I plan to propose following this.
Under ARC, methods in the "init" family are considered to have
NS_REPLACES_RECEIVER semantics ("consumes" self and returning a
value at +1). This is correct for Objective-C "init methods",
which are equivalent for Swift's initializers, but almost never
correct for any other methods that happen to start with the word
"init".
Note that Swift still follows all the other ARC conventions, so
if you name a method or property, say, "newItemController", the
value will be returned at +1. For methods this is probably
desirable, but for properties maybe not. We could do something
similar for property accessors to make sure they always have
the default "no method family" semantics in Objective-C.
rdar://problem/25759260
