For long names this is easier to read and in most cases the omitted information can be seen in the actual SIL code.
With the option -Xllvm -sil-full-demangle the old behavior can be restored.
And use project_box to get to the address value.
SILGen now generates a project_box for each alloc_box.
And IRGen re-uses the address value from the alloc_box if the operand of project_box is an alloc_box.
This lets the generated code be the same as before.
Other than that most changes of this (quite large) commit are straightforward.
Having a separate address and container value returned from alloc_stack is not really needed in SIL.
Even if they differ we have both addresses available during IRGen, because a dealloc_stack is always dominated by the corresponding alloc_stack in the same function.
Although this commit quite large, most changes are trivial. The largest non-trivial change is in IRGenSIL.
This commit is a NFC regarding the generated code. Even the generated SIL is the same (except removed #0, #1 and @local_storage).
Warns of deprecation, checks all the appropriate bits to see if we can
do an automatic fix, and generates fix-its if that is valid.
Also adds a note if the loop looks like it ought to be a simple
for-each, but really isn’t because the loop var is modified inside the
loop.
Debug variable info may be attached to debug_value, debug_value_addr,
alloc_box, and alloc_stack instructions.
In order to write textual SIL -> SIL testcases that exercise the handling
of debug information by SIL passes, we need to make a couple of additions
to the textual SIL language. In memory, the debug information attached to
SIL instructions references information from the AST. If we want to create
debug info from parsing a textual .sil file, these bits need to be made
explicit.
Performance Notes: This is memory neutral for compilations from Swift
source code, because the variable name is still stored in the AST. For
compilations from textual source the variable name is stored in tail-
allocated memory following the SIL instruction that introduces the
variable.
<rdar://problem/22707128>
Modeling nonescaping captures as @inout parameters is wrong, because captures are allowed to share state, unlike 'inout' parameters, which are allowed to assume to some degree that there are no aliases during the parameter's scope. To model this, introduce a new @inout_aliasable parameter convention to indicate an indirect parameter that can be written to, not only by the current function, but by well-typed, well-synchronized aliasing accesses too. (This is unrelated to our discussions of adding a "type-unsafe-aliasable" annotation to pointer_to_address to allow for safe pointer punning.)
SILPrinter was printing uses for all SIL values, except for SIL basic blocks arguments. Fill the gap and print uses for BB arguments as well. This makes reading and analyzing SIL easier.
Basic blocks may have multiple arguments, therefore print uses of each BB argument on separate lines - one line per BB argument.
The comment containing information about uses of a BB argument is printed on the line just above the basic block name, following the approach used for function_ref and other kinds of instructions, which have additional information printed on the line above the actual instruction.
The output now looks like:
// %0 // user: %3
// %1 // user: %9
bb0(%0 : $Int32, %1 : $UnsafeMutablePointer<UnsafeMutablePointer<Int8>>):
rdar://23336589
And include some supplementary mangling changes:
- Give the first generic param (depth=0, index=0) a single character mangling. Even after removing the self type from method declaration types, 'Self' still shows up very frequently in protocol requirement signatures.
- Fix the mangling of generic parameter counts to elide the count when there's only one parameter at the starting depth of the mangling.
Together these carve another 154KB out of a debug standard library. There's some awkwardness in demangled strings that I'll clean up in subsequent commits; since decl types now only mangle the number of generic params at their own depth, it's context-dependent what depths those represent, which we get wrong now. Currying markers are also wrong, but since free function currying is going away, we can mangle the partial application thunks in different ways.
Swift SVN r32896
'Ss' appears in manglings tens of thousands of times in the standard library and is also incredibly frequent in other modules. This alone is enough to shrink the standard library by 59KB.
Swift SVN r32409
Using a func decl lost this, which leads to some undesirable behavior when mutating values in 'defer' blocks, such as losing inout deshadowing.
Swift SVN r30788
The defer body func is only ever fully applied, so SILGen can avoid allocating a closure for it if it's declared as a 'func', making it slightly more efficient at -Onone.
Swift SVN r30638
As part of this, I've made the demangler base the colon-vs.-not
decision on the entity kind instead of assuming that anything
with a function type must be a function. It also looks through
new-style generics when it didn't before.
Swift SVN r28814
var/let bindings to _ when they are never used, and use some values that
are only written. This is a testsuite cleanup, NFC. More to come.
Swift SVN r28406
includes a number of QoI things to help people write the correct code. I will commit
the testcase for it as the next patch.
The bulk of this patch is moving the stdlib, testsuite and validation testsuite to
the new syntax. I moved a few uses of "as" patterns back to as? expressions in the
stdlib as well.
Swift SVN r27959
Now we bind the defer body into a ClosureExpr and emit it at the point of
the defer. At any exit points out of the controlled region, we emit a call
to the closure.
This should cover any problems where expressions cannot be emitted multiple times.
However, this is dramatically more complex than the obvious implementation, so I
hope this patch can be reverted.
Swift SVN r27767
missing piece now is Sema support for detecting invalid exits
out of defer bodies. That said, SILGen will also detect it,
and produce an error if sema misses something, e.g.:
t.swift:11:23: error: defer statement is not allowed to be exited
while false { defer { break } }
^
t.swift:12:9: error: defer statement is not allowed to be exited
defer { return }
^
we should still diagnose these in Sema for better QoI of course.
This wraps up: <rdar://problem/17302850> Add a defer keyword to swift
Swift SVN r27760
The rule changes are as follows:
* All functions (introduced with the 'func' keyword) have argument
labels for arguments beyond the first, by default. Methods are no
longer special in this regard.
* The presence of a default argument no longer implies an argument
label.
The actual changes to the parser and printer are fairly simple; the
rest of the noise is updating the standard library, overlays, tests,
etc.
With the standard library, this change is intended to be API neutral:
I've added/removed #'s and _'s as appropriate to keep the user
interface the same. If we want to separately consider using argument
labels for more free functions now that the defaults in the language
have shifted, we can tackle that separately.
Fixes rdar://problem/17218256.
Swift SVN r27704
Change all uses of "do { ... } while <cond>" to use "repeat" instead.
Rename DoWhileStmt to RepeatWhileStmt. Add diagnostic suggesting change
of 'do' to 'repeat' if a condition is found afterwards.
<rdar://problem/20336424> rename do/while loops to repeat/while & introduce "repeat <count> {}" loops
Swift SVN r27650
This changes 'if let' conditions to take general refutable patterns, instead of
taking a irrefutable pattern and implicitly matching against an optional.
Where before you might have written:
if let x = foo() {
you now need to write:
if let x? = foo() {
The upshot of this is that you can write anything in an 'if let' that you can
write in a 'case let' in a switch statement, which is pretty general.
To aid with migration, this special cases certain really common patterns like
the above (and any other irrefutable cases, like "if let (a,b) = foo()", and
tells you where to insert the ?. It also special cases type annotations like
"if let x : AnyObject = " since they are no longer allowed.
For transitional purposes, I have intentionally downgraded the most common
diagnostic into a warning instead of an error. This means that you'll get:
t.swift:26:10: warning: condition requires a refutable pattern match; did you mean to match an optional?
if let a = f() {
^
?
I think this is important to stage in, because this is a pretty significant
source breaking change and not everyone internally may want to deal with it
at the same time. I filed 20166013 to remember to upgrade this to an error.
In addition to being a nice user feature, this is a nice cleanup of the guts
of the compiler, since it eliminates the "isConditional()" bit from
PatternBindingDecl, along with the special case logic in the compiler to handle
it (which variously added and removed Optional around these things).
Swift SVN r26150
