* Make FloatingPoint require that Self.Magnitude == Self
We didn't have the where clause to express this constraint at the time that the FloatingPoint protocol was implemented, but we do now. This is not a semantic change to FloatingPoint, which has always bound IEEE-754 arithmetic types, for which this constraint would necessarily hold, but it does effect the type system.
For example, currently the following function does not type check:
~~~~
func foo<T>(x: T) -> T where T: FloatingPoint {
var r = x.remainder(dividingBy: 1)
return r.magnitude
}
~~~~
with this change, it compiles correctly.
Having done this, we no longer need to have a separate `abs` defined on FloatingPoint; we can use the existing function defined on `SignedNumeric` instead. Additionally mark the global `fabs` defined in the platform C module deprecated in favor of the Swift `abs`; we don't need to carry two names for this function going forward.
Not NFC because it changes the printing behavior for function type
parameters. They are no longer reported as types (paren, tuple, or raw),
but as Params.
@effects is too low a level, and not meant for general usage outside
the standard library. Therefore it deserves to be underscored like
other such attributes.
Calling '@objc optional func' requires '?' or '!' after its name. When
completing method calls for them, 'key.sourcetext' should have '?'
whereas 'key.name' shouldn't.
Note that we deliberately do not use optional type name for
'key.typename'. This is consistent with optional chain '?.<propertyName>'
behavior.
rdar://problem/37904574
Refactors the diagnostic code to be run whenever a compilation
notification has been started and there are diagnostics available in the
consumer. This allows us to capture diagnostics on all exit paths, and
specifically when code-completion fails because of invalid arguments.
Note: the editor.open code path still doesn't report invalid arguments
because it fails before even trying to create an AST.
Made an utility method 'consumeArgumentLabel', and use it for:
* Labels in tuple type
* Labels in tuple expression
* Argument and parameter names in parameter clause
If the Clang declrations are *types*, canonical declaration in Swift is
imported for newest version of Swift. In interface generation, if the
declaration is versioned and it's imported as a member in either or both
version of Swift, we have to take compatibility typealias into account.
* Fixed 'ClangModuleUnit::getTopLevelDecls' to take isCompatibilityAlias() into account
* Fixed bugs in ClangImporter where member-to-member versioned types aren't properly imported.
* Fixed 'SwiftDeclConverter::importFullName' to check equality of getEffectiveContext()
* Fixed 'importer::addEntryToLookupTable' to check equality of getEffectiveContext()
(moved 'ClangImporter::Implementation::forEachDistinctName' to 'NameImporter')
... instead of overriding it after the driver is done. This improves
the fidelity of anything that looks at the resource directory inside the
driver or frontend argument parsing. In particular, it fixes an issue
where sourcekit requests would fail if they included the -sanitize=
option because the driver would fail to find the runtime libraries.
Even though this should be *more correct* for all uses, in the
interests of understanding all possible immediate effects of this
change, I manually audited all the code that looks at the resource
directory in between when it is parsed as and argument and when
createCompilerInvocation returns. I claim that the only changes are:
1. The sanitizer library check that we wanted to change
2. The DWARFDebugFlags, which are for IRGen so don't affect SourceKit
3. The Migrator data paths, which also don't affect SourceKit
For now, I put the -resource-dir option at the end of the arguments so
that it overrides any existing option, which mimics how it behaved
before. We might want to move it to the beginning so that we honour a
user-provided resource directory, but that should be a separate change.
rdar://40147839
This can't arise from a clean build, but it can happen if you have
products lingering in a search path and then either rebuild one of
the modules in the cycle, or change the search paths.
The way this is implemented is for each module to track whether its
imports have all been resolved. If, when loading a module, one of its
dependencies hasn't resolved all of its imports yet, then we know
there's a cycle.
This doesn't produce the best diagnostics, but it's hard to get into
this state in the first place, so that's probably okay.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-7483
