* [Diagnostics] Emit a warning when an immutable decodable property has an initial value
* [Sema] Use Decl::diagnose instead of Diags.diagnose
* [AST] Remove property name from 'decodable_property_will_not_be_decoded' diagnostic
* [Test] Update tests
* [Test] Update existing codable tests
The semantic checks for CodingKeys are being duplicated across the value witness synthesis code paths. Just synthesize a CodingKeys enum and let validateCodingKeysEnum do the heavy lifting when we actually need to go emit diagnostics.
* [TypeChecker] Enclosing stubs protocol note within editor mode
* [test] Removing note from test where there is no -diagnostics-editor-mode flag
* Formatting modified code
* [tests] Fixing tests under validation-tests
When there's a module with the same name as a type in a
different module, lookup will look into the type, not the module, when
resolving members. Until that behavior is fixed, add a note showing what
lookup was trying to look into, to make the behavior more clear.
Helps rdar://54770139
Under non-editor mode, the fixit for inserting protocol stubs is associated with a note
pointing to the missing protocol member declaration which could stay in a separate file from
the conforming type, leading to the behavior of rdar://51534405. This change checks if
the fixit is in a separate file and issues another note to carry the fixit if so.
rdar://51534405
When synthesizing Codable conformances, the enum case name for a
property with an attached delegate does not have the '$', i.e., it's
the name of the originally-declared property.
Decodable’s init(from:) synthesis sometimes mistook a static property for an identically-named instance property, which could cause it to skip a property or possibly make other mistakes. This change factors a common helper function from encode(to:) and init(from:) synthesis which implements the right logic for both.
Otherwise, the initializer won't be inherited properly onto a
subclass, resulting in the base class being allocated instead of the
subclass when using Sub.init(from:).
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-8083
'private' properties can't be accessed in extensions in Swift 3, so synthesizing
a conformance that reads from such things is going to be incorrect in an
extension.
This works for all protocols except for Decodable on non-final classes, because
the init requirement has to be 'required' and thus in the type's declaration.
Fixes most of https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-6803.
Previously, we just took the first match so:
1. We would try to emit a metatype lookup of the property but had prepared an instance lookup.
2. Could get the wrong type if the static/instance property had different types.
rdar://39669212
By formalizing ReferenceOwnership as a diagnostic argument kind, we get
less boilerplate, better type safety, better output consistency, and
last but not least: future proofing.
Since 'private' means "limit to the enclosing scope (and extensions
thereof)", putting it on a member means that the member can't be
accessed everywhere the type might show up. That's normally a good
thing, but it's not the desired effect for synthesized members used
for derived conformances, and when it comes to class initializers this
actually violates AST invariants.
rdar://problem/39478298
Continue to emit notes for the candidates, but use different text.
Note that we can emit a typo correction fix-it even if there are
multiple candidates with the same name.
Also, disable typo correction in the migrator, since the operation
is quite expensive, the notes are never presented to the user, and
the fix-its can interfere with the migrator's own edits.
Our general guidance is that fix-its should be added on the main
diagnostic only when the fix-it is highly likely to be correct.
The exact threshold is debateable. Typo correction is certainly
capable of making mistakes, but most of its edits are right, and
when it's wrong it's usually obviously wrong. On balance, I think
this is the right thing to do. For what it's worth, it's also
what we do in Clang.
If a generic parameter has both a class and protocol constraint,
walking up to the class's superclass would cause us to subsequently
ignore any initializer requirements in the protocol.
Fixes <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1663>, <rdar://problem/22722738>.
When performing a binding/assignment to a weak or unowned variable/property from an initialiser call, emit a warning that the instance will be immediately deallocated.
Stop creating ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> so that we can remove it
from the type system.
Enable the code that generates disjunctions for Optional<T> and
rewrites expressions based on the original declared type being 'T!'.
Most of the changes supporting this were previously merged to master,
but some things were difficult to merge to master without actually
removing IUOs from the type system:
- Dynamic member lookup and dynamic subscripting
- Changes to ensure the bridging peephole still works
Past commits have attempted to retain as much fidelity with how we
were printing things as possible. There are some cases where we still
are not printing things the same way:
- In diagnostics we will print '?' rather than '!'
- Some SourceKit and Code Completion output where we print a Type
rather than Decl.
Things like module printing via swift-ide-test attempt to print '!'
any place that we now have Optional types that were declared as IUOs.
There are some diagnostics regressions related to the fact that we can
no longer "look through" IUOs. For the same reason some output and
functionality changes in Code Completion. I have an idea of how we can
restore these, and have opened a bug to investigate doing so.
There are some small source compatibility breaks that result from
this change:
- Results of dynamic lookup that are themselves declared IUO can in
rare circumstances be inferred differently. This shows up in
test/ClangImporter/objc_parse.swift, where we have
var optStr = obj.nsstringProperty
Rather than inferring optStr to be 'String!?', we now infer this to
be 'String??', which is in line with the expectations of SE-0054.
The fact that we were only inferring the outermost IUO to be an
Optional in Swift 4 was a result of the incomplete implementation of
SE-0054 as opposed to a particular design. This should rarely cause
problems since in the common-case of actually using the property rather
than just assigning it to a value with inferred type, we will behave
the same way.
- Overloading functions with inout parameters strictly by a difference
in optionality (i.e. Optional<T> vs. ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T>)
will result in an error rather than the diagnostic that was added
in Swift 4.1.
- Any place where '!' was being used where it wasn't supposed to be
allowed by SE-0054 will now treat the '!' as if it were '?'.
Swift 4.1 generates warnings for these saying that putting '!'
in that location is deprecated. These locations include for example
typealiases or any place where '!' is nested in another type like
`Int!?` or `[Int!]`.
This commit effectively means ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> is no
longer part of the type system, although I haven't actually removed
all of the code dealing with it yet.
ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> is is dead, long live implicitly
unwrapped Optional<T>!
Resolves rdar://problem/33272674.
