This patch changes the syntax map data structure it uses to be offset based
rather than line/col based in order to avoid calling getLineAndColumn for the
start and end offset of every token. This removes the 30% of time spent in
getLineAndColumn for this request in large files (rdar://problem/28965123).
The logic for returning the affected range and the token ranges to highlight
following an edit also made several assumptions that no longer hold. This
patch changes it to compare the syntax maps from before and after the edit,
find the first mismtaching tokens from the start and end of the syntax maps
and return the tokens in that range (adjusted to line boundaries). This fixes
syntax highlighting issues with interpolated multi-line strings
(rdar://problem/32148117) and block comments.
With the above changes the per-keystroke time spent for syntax highlighting
(with sematic info disabled) dropped from ~80ms to just under 50ms for a
12KLOC file.
This patch allows Parser to generate a refined token stream to satisfy tooling's need. For syntax coloring, token stream from lexer is insufficient because (1) we have contextual keywords like get and set; (2) we may allow keywords to be used as argument labels and names; and (3) we need to split tokens like "==<". In this patch, these refinements are directly fulfilled through parsing without additional heuristics. The refined token vector is optionally saved in SourceFile instance.
With broken code you can end up with non-postfix completions when
searching for inner operators, which you never want because you end up
creating compound results like "fooUIColor".
rdar://problem/34145229
This implementation required a compromise between parser
performance and AST structuring. On the one hand, Parse
must be fast in order to keep things in the IDE zippy, on
the other we must hit the disk to properly resolve 'canImport'
conditions and inject members of the active clause into the AST.
Additionally, a Parse-only pass may not provide platform-specific
information to the compiler invocation and so may mistakenly
activate or de-activate branches in the if-configuration decl.
The compromise is to perform condition evaluation only when
continuing on to semantic analysis. This keeps the parser quick
and avoids the unpacking that parse does for active conditions
while still retaining the ability to see through to an active
condition when we know we're moving on to semantic analysis anyways.
"Accessibility" has a different meaning for app developers, so we've
already deliberately excised it from our diagnostics in favor of terms
like "access control" and "access level". Do the same in the compiler
now that we aren't constantly pulling things into the release branch.
Rename AccessibilityAttr to AccessControlAttr and
SetterAccessibilityAttr to SetterAccessAttr, then track down the last
few uses of "accessibility" that don't have to do with
NSAccessibility. (I left the SourceKit XPC API alone because that's
supposed to be more stable.)
"Accessibility" has a different meaning for app developers, so we've
already deliberately excised it from our diagnostics in favor of terms
like "access control" and "access level". Do the same in the compiler
now that we aren't constantly pulling things into the release branch.
This commit changes the 'Accessibility' enum to be named 'AccessLevel'.
Currently, SourceKit's CMake functions all use DEPENDS to specify
libraries the targets will link with. This is confusing as it doesn't
behave the same way that add_swift behaves, and implies that
dependencies are created when there aren't.
* Generate libSyntax API
This patch removes the hand-rolled libSyntax API and replaces it with an
API that's entirely automatically generated. This means the API is
guaranteed to be internally stylistically and functionally consistent.
Comparing to CharSourceRange, token stream is a better way because we can preserve comment information at the start of the range.
Needed for rdar://33437855
For normal completions it behaves the same as PostfixExprBeginning, but
it provides a hook for clients to provide a custom completion for this
position. For example, you might want to a x ..< y snippet in this
position.
rdar://problem/29910383
When using completion options that will allow the lone "." completion,
provide that result when in contexts that expect an enum type. Note:
this is a crappy approximationg for whether the type can have "implicit
member expression" syntax, since uninhabited enums should not support
it, and many non-enum types should. However, it is currently expensive
to compute the accurate answer and this approximation is good enough for
some clients.
rdar://problem/31260505
