If the only difference between two functions is `throws` and it
is not a subtype relationship, let's repair the problem by dropping
`throws` attribute and letting solver continue to search for
a solution, which would later be diagnosed.
This way it covers a lot more ground and doesn't conflict with
other fixes.
Another notable change is related to check for IUO associated
with source type, that covers cases like:
```swift
func foo(_ v: NSString!) -> String {
return v
}
```
Instead of general conversion failure check for IUO enables solver
to introduce force downcast fix.
Add constraint fix `AllowAutoClosurePointerConversion` and corresponding diagnostic
`AutoClosurePointerConversionFailure`. When we discover that we're trying to do an
inout-to-pointer conversion in `matchTypes`, add the constraint fix, which tries to do the
conversion as if the pointer type is a regular function argument.
Instead of keeping two locators in the fix let's store only the
original locator and simplify it later in process of emitting
a diagnostic. That helps to avoid some duplicate work as well
as makes sure that locators supplied to the diagnostic always
have an anchor.
Resolves: rdar://problem/53344815
Diagnose situation when a single "tuple" parameter is given N arguments e.g.
```swift
func foo<T>(_ x: (T, Bool)) {}
foo(1, false) // foo exptects a single argument of tuple type `(1, false)`
```
Additionally, refactor some of the logic for the original add $ diagnostic
so that a lot of logic can be shared between the two. Also rename the
original fix and diagnostic to better reflect their purpose.
For the purposes of fix deduplication, we want to use the simplified
locator. However for the purposes of diagnostics, preserve the full
locator, which gives us more information to work with.
Add `llvm_unreachable` to mark covered switches which MSVC does not
analyze correctly and believes that there exists a path through the
function without a return value.
Introduce a fix to detect and diagnose situations when omitted
generic arguments couldn't be deduced by the solver based on
the enclosing context.
Example:
```swift
struct S<T> {
}
_ = S() // There is not enough context to deduce `T`
```
Resolves: rdar://problem/51203824
All places where `invalid member ref` fix/diagnostic is used already
have a reference to the potential member choice declaration, which
diagnostic could take advantage of.
Extend use of `missing protocol conformance` fix to cover contextual
failures, such as:
- Assignment mismatches, where destination requires source to conform
to certain protocol (or protocol composition);
- Incorrect returns where returned type doesn't conform to the
protocol specified in the signature.
Extend use of `missing protocol conformance` fix to cover contextual
failures, such as:
- Assignment mismatches, where destination requires source to conform
to certain protocol (or protocol composition);
- Incorrect returns where returned type doesn't conform to the
protocol specified in the signature.
Detect and diagnose a contextual mismatch between expected
collection element type and the one provided (e.g. source
of the assignment or argument to a call) e.g.:
```swift
let _: [Int] = ["hello"]
func foo(_: [Int]) {}
foo(["hello"])
```
Diagnose extraneous use of address of (`&`) which could only be
associated with arguments to `inout` parameters e.g.
```swift
struct S {}
var a: S = ...
var b: S = ...
a = &b
```
Detect situations where key path doesn't have capability required
by the context e.g. read-only vs. writable, or either root or value
types are incorrect e.g.
```swift
struct S { let foo: Int }
let _: WritableKeyPath<S, Int> = \.foo
```
Here context requires a writable key path but `foo` property is
read-only.
