When compiling the OnoneSupport library, the compiler checks for @_semantics("prespecialize.X") attributes to pre-specialize function X.
rdar://problem/48924409
Add the list of symbols from the swift-5.0 release and only use that symbols to refer to pre-specializations in a Onone build.
This ensures that future Onone executables can link to an old swift 5.0 libswiftSwiftOnoneSupport library.
rdar://problem/48924409
This is an obvious drive-by fix. It will crash when building
Foundation after I commit changes to the pipeline. My attempts at
creating a unit test were unsuccessful because it depends on some
interaction between inlining and specialization heuristics.
It's @_semantics("optimize.sil.specialize.generic.size.never")
It is similar to "optimize.sil.specialize.generic.partial.never", but only prevents specialization if the optimization mode is Size
Previously, the EagerSpecializer pass would sometimes call a method on a null CanSpecializedGenericSignature. The method happened to never touch `this` if it was null, but UBSan still considers the call to be undefined behavior.
This change tests for the condition ahead of time and manually implements equivalent behavior without calling the method.
I am going to add the code in a bit that does the notifications. I tried to pass
down the builder instead of the pass manager. I also tried not to change the
formatting.
rdar://42301529
This commit does not modify those APIs or their usage. It just:
1. Moves the APIs onto SILFunctionBuilder and makes SILFunctionBuilder a friend
of SILModule.
2. Hides the APIs on SILModule so all users need to use SILFunctionBuilder to
create/destroy functions.
I am doing this in order to allow for adding/removing function notifications to
be enforced via the type system in the SILOptimizer. In the process of finishing
off CallerAnalysis for FSO, I discovered that we were not doing this everywhere
we need to. After considering various other options such as:
1. Verifying after all passes that the notifications were sent correctly and
asserting. Turned out to be expensive.
2. Putting a callback in SILModule. This would add an unnecessary virtual call.
I realized that by using a builder we can:
1. Enforce that users of SILFunctionBuilder can only construct composed function
builders by making the composed function builder's friends of
SILFunctionBuilder (notice I did not use the word subclass, I am talking
about a pure composition).
2. Refactor a huge amount of code in SILOpt/SILGen that involve function
creation onto a SILGenFunctionBuilder/SILOptFunctionBuilder struct. Many of
the SILFunction creation code in question are straight up copies of each
other with small variations. A builder would be a great way to simplify that
code.
3. Reduce the size of SILModule.cpp by 25% from ~30k -> ~23k making the whole
file easier to read.
NOTE: In this commit, I do not hide the constructor of SILFunctionBuilder since
I have not created the derived builder structs yet. Once I have created those in
a subsequent commit, I will hide that constructor.
rdar://42301529
So far we immediately bailed once we detect a cycle in specializations. But it turned out that this prevented efficient code generation for some stdlib functions like compactMap.
With this change we allow specialization of cycles up to a depth of 1 (= still very limited to prevent code size explosion in some corner cases).
The effect of this optimization is tested with the existing benchmark FatCompactMap.
SR-7952, rdar://problem/41005326
The "subclass scope" is meant to represent a connection to a vtable (and how
public something needs to be), for things that end up in class
vtables. Specializations and thunks are mostly internal implementation details
and do not end up there, so subclass scope is not applicable to them. This stops
the thunks and specializations being incorrectly public.
(Note, there are some thunks that _are_ public facing: if a function has its
signature optimized, the original entry point becomes a thunk, and this entry
point is what ends up in vtables etc., so needs to remain around, which means
keeping the same hacks for `private` members of an `open` class.)
Fixes rdar://problem/40738913.
SubstitutionMaps are now just a trivial pointer-sized value, so
pass them by value instead.
I did have to move a couple of functors from Type.h to SubstitutionMap.h
to resolve some issues with forward declarations.
There isn't a clean cut point here, so switch
GenericSpecializationInformation from SubstitutionList to
SubstitutionMap and carry along dual SubstitutionMap/SubstitutionList
representations for a small part of ReabstractionInfo.
This is a property of an instruction and should be a member
function of `SILInstruction` and not a free function in
`DebugUtils`. Discussed with Adrian.
We did this for @in => @owned for all parameters before enabling +0. We decided
to defer this work to after +0 was turned back on.
This also fixes the array_contentof_opt test without making append(contentOf: )
take the container at +1.
rdar://38152291
We already do this for @in parameters. I think it was just never implemented for
@in_guaranteed. The reason I am doing this now is that a bunch of test cases
that tested @in -> trivial. By doing this I get the @in_guaranteed -> trivial
implying those test cases do not need to be updated.
Important Note: We have bad test cases for resilience when dealing with generic specializer. Also add correct test cases + change existing ones
Note2: We only support this for trivial in_guaranteed types
Create helpers in InstructionUtils.h wherever we need a guarantee that the diagnostics cover the same patterns as the verifier. Eventually this will be called from both SILVerifier and the diagnostic pass:
- findAccessedAddressBase
- isPossibleFormalAccessBase
- isPartialApplyOfReabstractionThunk
- findClosureForAppliedArg
- visitAccessedAddress
Add partial_apply verification assert.
This applies the normal "find a closure" logic inside the "find all partial_apply uses" verification. Making the verifier round-trip ensures that we don't have holes in exclusivity enforcement related to this logic.
In case of partial specialization, the replacement type of a substitution can be generic.
I couldn't find a small unit test for this bug fix. But it is tested by compiling the stdlib with the change in Collection.swift.
rdar://problem/36033852
We can just !SILFunction::hasQualifiedOwnership(). Plus as Andy pointed out,
even ignoring the functional aspects, having APIs with names this close can
create confusion.
Adds a combined API to output both debug message and optimization remarks.
The previously added test partial_specialization_debug.sil ensures that it's an
NFC for debug output.
For now these are underscored attributes, i.e. compiler internal attributes:
@_optimize(speed)
@_optimize(size)
@_optimize(none)
Those attributes override the command-line specified optimization mode for a specific function.
The @_optimize(none) attribute is equivalent to the already existing @_semantics("optimize.sil.never") attribute
This commit is mostly refactoring.
*) Introduce a new OptimizationMode enum and use that in SILOptions and IRGenOptions
*) Allow the optimization mode also be specified for specific SILFunctions. This is not used in this commit yet and thus still a NFC.
Also, fixes a minor bug: we didn’t run mandatory IRGen passes for functions with @_semantics("optimize.sil.never")
