* Update DAK_Available name to match @available keyword
Update expected errors for @available attribute tests
* Update available attribute keyword name in DeclAttrKeyword documentation comment
Now
* NotApplicable: The result is not relevant for type relation (e.g.
keywords, and overloads)
* Unknown: the relation was not calculated (e.g. cached results), or the
context type is unknown.
* Invalid: The result type is invalid for this context (i.e. 'Void' for
non-'Void' context)
* Unrelated: The result type has no relation to the context type
* Convertible: The result type is convertible to the context type
* Identical: The result type is identical to the context type
By convention, most structs and classes in the Swift compiler include a `dump()` method which prints debugging information. This method is meant to be called only from the debugger, but this means they’re often unused and may be eliminated from optimized binaries. On the other hand, some parts of the compiler call `dump()` methods directly despite them being intended as a pure debugging aid. clang supports attributes which can be used to avoid these problems, but they’re used very inconsistently across the compiler.
This commit adds `SWIFT_DEBUG_DUMP` and `SWIFT_DEBUG_DUMPER(<name>(<params>))` macros to declare `dump()` methods with the appropriate set of attributes and adopts this macro throughout the frontend. It does not pervasively adopt this macro in SILGen, SILOptimizer, or IRGen; these components use `dump()` methods in a different way where they’re frequently called from debugging code. Nor does it adopt it in runtime components like swiftRuntime and swiftReflection, because I’m a bit worried about size.
Despite the large number of files and lines affected, this change is NFC.
This simplifies the code and prevents an assertion failure this code was
hitting computing the type relations between the result types and what it
determined as the expected type.
Resolves rdar://problem/53958454
In parser, 'parseExprPostfixSuffix()' can parse postfix expression for
'super'. 'parseExprSuper()' doesn't need to parse them.
In code-completion, 'completeExprSuper()' and 'completeExprSuperDot()'
can be consolidated to 'completePostfixExpr()' and 'completeDotExpr()'.
Extend the support for single-expression closures to handle
single-expression functions of all kinds. This allows, e.g.
func foo() -> MyEnum { .<here> }
to complete members of `MyEnum`.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Implement 'get', 'set', 'willSet', 'didSet' completion at the beginning
of accessor position.
var value: Ty {
<HERE> // 'get', 'set', 'willSet' and 'didSet' along with normal
// completion.
}
var value: Ty {
get { return ... }
<HERE> // 'get', 'set', 'willSet' and 'didSet' only.
}
rdar://problem/20957182
Added the 'Module::getPrecedenceGroups' API to separate precedence group lookup
from 'Module::lookupVisibleDecls', which together with 'FileUnit::lookupVisibleDecls',
to which the former is forwarded, are expected to look up only 'ValueDecl'. In particular, this
prevents completions like Module.PrecedenceGroup.
* Consolidate CompletionKind::KeyPathExpr and CompletionKind::KeyPathExprDot
to CompletionKind::KeyPathExprObjC
* Make completeKeyPath() to receive DotLoc.
For now, the accessors have been underscored as `_read` and `_modify`.
I'll prepare an evolution proposal for this feature which should allow
us to remove the underscores or, y'know, rename them to `purple` and
`lettuce`.
`_read` accessors do not make any effort yet to avoid copying the
value being yielded. I'll work on it in follow-up patches.
Opaque accesses to properties and subscripts defined with `_modify`
accessors will use an inefficient `materializeForSet` pattern that
materializes the value to a temporary instead of accessing it in-place.
That will be fixed by migrating to `modify` over `materializeForSet`,
which is next up after the `read` optimizations.
SIL ownership verification doesn't pass yet for the test cases here
because of a general fault in SILGen where borrows can outlive their
borrowed value due to being cleaned up on the general cleanup stack
when the borrowed value is cleaned up on the formal-access stack.
Michael, Andy, and I discussed various ways to fix this, but it seems
clear to me that it's not in any way specific to coroutine accesses.
rdar://35399664
At some point we stopped completing keywords after `else` in an if
statement. Bring back the completion of `if`, which is the only valid
continuation other than a brace.
rdar://37467474
For normal completions it behaves the same as PostfixExprBeginning, but
it provides a hook for clients to provide a custom completion for this
position. For example, you might want to a x ..< y snippet in this
position.
rdar://problem/29910383
When using completion options that will allow the lone "." completion,
provide that result when in contexts that expect an enum type. Note:
this is a crappy approximationg for whether the type can have "implicit
member expression" syntax, since uninhabited enums should not support
it, and many non-enum types should. However, it is currently expensive
to compute the accurate answer and this approximation is good enough for
some clients.
rdar://problem/31260505
Add an option to the lexer to go back and get a list of "full"
tokens, which include their leading and trailing trivia, which
we can index into from SourceLocs in the current AST.
This starts the Syntax sublibrary, which will support structured
editing APIs. Some skeleton support and basic implementations are
in place for types and generics in the grammar. Yes, it's slightly
redundant with what we have right now. lib/AST conflates syntax
and semantics in the same place(s); this is a first step in changing
that to separate the two concepts for clarity and also to get closer
to incremental parsing and type-checking. The goal is to eventually
extract all of the syntactic information from lib/AST and change that
to be more of a semantic/symbolic model.
Stub out a Semantics manager. This ought to eventually be used as a hub
for encapsulating lazily computed semantic information for syntax nodes.
For the time being, it can serve as a temporary place for mapping from
Syntax nodes to semantically full lib/AST nodes.
This is still in a molten state - don't get too close, wear appropriate
proximity suits, etc.
What I've implemented here deviates from the current proposal text
in the following ways:
- I had to introduce a FunctionArrowPrecedence to capture the parsing
of -> in expression contexts.
- I found it convenient to continue to model the assignment property
explicitly.
- The comparison and casting operators have historically been
non-associative; I have chosen to preserve that, since I don't
think this proposal intended to change it.
- This uses the precedence group names and higherThan/lowerThan
as agreed in discussion.
Right now 'fileprivate' is parsed as an alias for 'private' (or
perhaps vice versa, since the semantics of 'private' haven't changed
yet). This allows us to migrate code to 'fileprivate' without waiting
for the full implementation.
If a declaration is marked deprecated (but not unavailable) we want to
mark it as "not recommended" so that users know this probably isn't what
you want. We already do something like this in Clang code completions of
deprecated ObjC declarations.
rdar://problem/26335424
Implement code completion support for Objective-C #keyPath
expressions, using semantic analysis of the partially-typed keypath
argument to provide an appropriate set of results (i.e., just
properties and types).
This implements all of the necessary parts of SE-0062 / SR-1237 /
rdar://problem/25710611, although at some point I'd like to follow it
up with some warnings to help migrate existing string literals to
In the new code-completion code path, force any known operators to go
through a fixed sort order. To identify operators unambiguously, add a
new BuiltinOperator code-completion kind to handle non-decl operators
(!, ., ?., and =).
rdar://problem/25994246
rdar://problem/23440367
