References associated with a `VarDecl` had no `RelationContainedBy` role, resulting in "orphaned" references. From the perspective of identifying unused code (in tools using the index, like [Periphery](https://github.com/peripheryapp/periphery)), this made it impossible to identify that a variable's type, initializer and custom attributes are associated with the variable.
Resolves: [SR-13766](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-13766)
The async refactoring may perform recursive AST
walks in cases such as transforming the body of
a hoisted closure. Make sure this can be handled
by the logic tracking the ASTWalker in the
SourceEntityWalker, such that we don't crash when
later converting the call to a completion callback.
rdar://78693050
We had some unbalanced calls of `walkTo*Pre` and `walkTo*Post` in `SemaAnnotator`.
The main fix was to set `Cancelled` to `true` if traversal is being stopped in `walkToExprPre`.
While I was at it, I also
- Added some more checks, ensuring that no more `walkTo*` calls are issued after `Cancelled` has been set to `true`.
- Added some comments, describing the intended traversal behaviour.
- Inverted the return value of the `ReportParamList` lambda to be in line with the return value of the enclosing `walkToDeclPre`
- Moved `walkToExprPost` to be place right after `walkToExprPre`
Resolves rdar://64139829 [SR-12957]
* Reference is marked "explicit", which may be unexpected - the reason
is that the *call* is explicit, so we want to find it with e.g. rename,
or looking up callers, even though the identifier callAsFunction is
implicit. This matches the behaviour of initializers.
* The source location is the same as the base name (e.g. in `add3(5)`,
it would be at `add3`), which matches the behaviour of initializers.
rdar://problem/60327632
When building the implicit subscript expression, set the "implicit" bit
correctly and pass it through in the indexer so that we get implicit
refernces to the subscript. This would be useful for e.g. searching for
all uses of the dynamic subscript.
When users try to print the interface of a specific type (most often through cursor
infor query of SourceKit), we should simplify the original decls by replacing
archetypes with instantiated types, hiding extension details, and omitting
unfulfilled extension requirements. So the users can get the straight-to-the-point
"type interface". This commit builds the testing infrastructure for this feature,
and implements the first trick that wraps extension contents into the interface body.
This commit also moves some generic testing support from SourceKit to Swift.
Swift SVN r32630
When SourceEntityWalker visits a subscript reference it sometimes needed to visit
both open and close brackets. It used to be implemented as two calls to a regular
visitDeclReference which confused the clients expecting one call per a reference,
for example indexing was recording two references to a subscript.
We add a separate visitSubscriptReference to resolve this problem.
Swift SVN r31494
Modules occupy a weird space in the AST now: they can be treated like
types (Swift.Int), which is captured by ModuleType. They can be
treated like values for disambiguation (Swift.print), which is
captured by ModuleExpr. And we jump through hoops in various places to
store "either a module or a decl".
Start cleaning this up by transforming Module into ModuleDecl, a
TypeDecl that's implicitly created to describe a module. Subsequent
changes will start folding away the special cases (ModuleExpr ->
DeclRefExpr, name lookup results stop having a separate Module case,
etc.).
Note that the Module -> ModuleDecl typedef is there to limit the
changes needed. Much of this patch is actually dealing with the fact
that Module used to have Ctx and Name public members that now need to
be accessed via getASTContext() and getName(), respectively.
Swift SVN r28284
This completes the FileUnit refactoring. A module consists of multiple
FileUnits, which provide decls from various file-like sources. I say
"file-like" because the Builtin module is implemented with a single
BuiltinUnit, and imported Clang modules are just a single FileUnit source
within a module.
Most modules, therefore, contain a single file unit; only the main module
will contain multiple source files (and eventually partial AST files).
The term "translation unit" has been scrubbed from the project. To refer
to the context of declarations outside of any other declarations, use
"top-level" or "module scope". To refer to a .swift file or its DeclContext,
use "source file". To refer to a single unit of compilation, use "module",
since the model is that an entire module will be compiled with a single
driver call. (It will still be possible to compile a single source file
through the direct-to-frontend interface, but only in the context of the
whole module.)
Swift SVN r10837
