For using the improved condfail messages in the stdlib, we need a function, like precondition(), just taking a StaticString instead of a String for the message.
The existing (underscored) _precondition is a perfect fit for this, except that it's not printing the location info in debug builds.
This change makes _precondition() equivalent to precondition, just taking a StaticString as argument.
The other alternative would be to add another variant of precondition, just taking a StaticString. But we already have so many failure functions in Assert.swift, so adapting an existing one seems to be a better solution.
This effectively undos a change from 5 years ago which intentionally removed the location info from _precondition (rdar://problem/16958193). But this was at a time where swift was not open source yet. So I think today it's okay to always add location information, even if it's from inside the stdlib. It can be even very useful for expert users for looking up the location the stdlib source.
For using the improved condfail messages in the stdlib, we need a function, like precondition(), just taking a StaticString instead of a String for the message.
The existing (underscored) _precondition is a perfect fit for this, except that it's not printing the location info in debug builds.
This change makes _precondition() equivalent to precondition, just taking a StaticString as argument.
The other alternative would be to add another variant of precondition, just taking a StaticString. But we already have so many failure functions in Assert.swift, so adapting an existing one seems to be a better solution.
This effectively undos a change from 5 years ago which intentionally removed the location info from _precondition (rdar://problem/16958193). But this was at a time where swift was not open source yet. So I think today it's okay to always add location information, even if it's from inside the stdlib. It can be even very useful for expert users for looking up the location the stdlib source.
* [SILOptimizer] Don't diagnose infinite recursion if a branch terminates the program
This patch augments the infinite recursion checker to not warn if a
branch terminates, but still warns if a branch calls into something with
@_semantics("programtermination_point"). This way, calling fatalError
doesn't disqualify you for the diagnostic, but calling exit does.
This also removes the warning workaround in the standard library, and
annotates the internal _assertionFailure functions as
programtermination_points, so they get this treatment too.
* Fix formatting in SILInstructions.cpp
* Re-add missing test
This patch augments the infinite recursion checker to not warn if a
branch terminates, but still warns if a branch calls into something with
`@_semantics("arc.programtermination_point")`. This way, calling `fatalError`
doesn't disqualify you for the diagnostic, but calling `exit` does.
This also removes the warning workaround in the standard library, and
annotates the internal _assertionFailure functions as
`programtermination_point`s, so they get this treatment too.
Introduce an inner function that breaks the infinite recursion check, silencing this warning:
```
swift/stdlib/public/core/AssertCommon.swift:166:15: warning: all paths through this function will call itself
internal func _fatalErrorMessage(
^
```
* Removing FIXME from methods also marked always/never
* Unavailable/deprecated things don't need inlining
* Trivial implementations
* Enum namespaces
* Unsafe performance of opaque/raw pointer
* Dump doesn't need to be fast
* Error paths shouldn't require inlining
* Consistency with surrounding code
* Lazy performance needs specialization
Builds on 36eae9d4f6 to emit a message instead of just trapping
when a switch over a non-frozen enum ends up not matching anything.
If the enum is known to be an @objc enum, the message is
unexpected enum case 'MyEnum(rawValue: -42)'
and if it's anything else (a Swift enum, a tuple containing enums,
whatever), it's a more opaque
unexpected enum case while switching on value of type 'MyEnum'
The reason for this is to avoid calling String(describing:) or
String(reflecting:) an arbitrary value when the enum might conform to
CustomStringConvertible and therefore /itself/ have a switch that's
going to fall off the end. By handling plain @objc enums (using a
bitcast), we've at least covered the 90% case.
rdar://problem/37728359
* Unify the capitalization across all user-visible error messages (fatal errors, assertion failures, precondition failures) produced by the runtime, standard library and the compiler.
* Update some more tests to the new expectations.
Implements SE-0055: https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0055-optional-unsafe-pointers.md
- Add NULL as an extra inhabitant of Builtin.RawPointer (currently
hardcoded to 0 rather than being target-dependent).
- Import non-object pointers as Optional/IUO when nullable/null_unspecified
(like everything else).
- Change the type checker's *-to-pointer conversions to handle a layer of
optional.
- Use 'AutoreleasingUnsafeMutablePointer<NSError?>?' as the type of error
parameters exported to Objective-C.
- Drop NilLiteralConvertible conformance for all pointer types.
- Update the standard library and then all the tests.
I've decided to leave this commit only updating existing tests; any new
tests will come in the following commits. (That may mean some additional
implementation work to follow.)
The other major piece that's missing here is migration. I'm hoping we get
a lot of that with Swift 1.1's work for optional object references, but
I still need to investigate.
When we're not serializing SIL for all function bodies, @_transparent
functions can only reference internal functions that are declared
@_versioned, otherwise there's no serialized body and no public entry
point, so any client that inlines the @_transparent function will
not be able to link.
This patch adds the minimum set of @_versioned declarations to allow
a non-optimized build of the standard library and overlays.
Recall that this attribute is just a temporary hack to make progress
on building the standard library with resilience enabled.
Once availability and resilience learn about each other, @_versioned
will be replaced by having an availability annotation on an internal
declaration. Invariants will be diagnosed by Sema instead of asserting
in the SIL verifier.
Finally, the set of "internal but available" declarations will
eventually be audited instead of determined by experimentation.
This almost closes out https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-267.
The remaining issue is an interaction between SIL optimizations and
serialization that will be fixed with some upcoming changes to the
optimizer.
If this semantic tag is applied to a function, then we know that:
- The function does not touch any reference counted objects.
- After the function is executed, all reference counted objects are leaked
(most likely in preparation for program termination).
This allows one, when performing ARC code motion, to ignore blocks that contain
an apply to this function as long as the block does not have any other side
effect having instructions.
I have wanted to do this for a while but was stymied by lacking the ability to
apply multiple @_semantics attributes. This is now committed to trunk so I added
this attribute instead of pattern matching against fatalError (since there could
be other functions with this property).
rdar://19592537
