Beside supporting OSSA, this change significantly simplifies the pass.
The main change is that instead of starting at a closure (e.g. `partial_apply`) and finding all call sites, we now start at a call site and look for closures for all arguments. This makes a lot of things much simpler, e.g. not so many intermediate data structures are required to track all the states.
I needed to remove the 3 unit tests because the things those tests were testing are not there anymore. However, the pass is tested with a lot of sil tests (and I added quite a few), which should give good test coverage.
The old ClosureSpecializer pass is still kept in place, because at that point in the pipeline we don't have OSSA, yet. Once we have that, we can replace the old pass withe the new one.
However, the autodiff closure specializer already runs in the OSSA pipeline and there the new changes take effect.
The intent for `@inline(always)` is to act as an optimization control.
The user can rely on inlining to happen or the compiler will emit an error
message.
Because function values can be dynamic (closures, protocol/class lookup)
this guarantee can only be upheld for direct function references.
In cases where the optimizer can resolve dynamic function values the
attribute shall be respected.
rdar://148608854
(old name: CapturePropagation)
The pass is now rewritten in swift which makes the code smaller and simpler.
Compared to the old pass it has two improvements:
* It can constant propagate whole structs (and not only builtin literals). This is important for propagating "real" Swift constants which have a struct type of e.g. `Int`.
* It constant propagates keypaths even if there are other non-constant closure captures which are not propagated. This is something the old pass didn't do.
rdar://151185177
* move some Cloner utilities from ContextCommon.swift directly into Cloner.swift
* add an `cloneRecursively` overload which doesn't require the `customGetCloned` closure argument
* some small cleanups
So far, constant propagated arguments could only be builtin literals.
Now we support arbitrary structs (with constant arguments), e.g. `Int`.
This requires a small addition in the mangling scheme for function specializations.
Also, the de-mangling tree now looks a bit different to support a "tree" of structs and literals.
I am going to be adding support to passes for emitting IsolationHistory behind a
flag. As part of this, we need to store the state of the partition that created
the error when the error is emitted. A partition stores heap memory so it makes
sense to make these types noncopyable types so we just move the heap memory
rather than copying it all over the place.
If a guaranteed value is used in a dead-end exit block and the enclosing value is _not_ destroyed in this block, we end up missing the enclosing value as phi-argument after duplicating the loop.
TODO: once we have complete lifetimes we can remove this check again.
rdar://159125605
We want 'inout sending' parameters to have the semantics that not only are they
disconnected on return from the function but additionally they are guaranteed to
be in their own disconnected region on return. This implies that we must emit
errors when an 'inout sending' parameter or any element that is in the same
region as the current value within an 'inout sending' parameter is
returned. This commit contains a new diagnostic for RegionIsolation that adds
specific logic for detecting and emitting errors in these situations.
To implement this, we introduce 3 new diagnostics with each individual
diagnostic being slightly different to reflect the various ways that this error
can come up in source:
* Returning 'inout sending' directly:
```swift
func returnInOutSendingDirectly(_ x: inout sending NonSendableKlass) -> NonSendableKlass {
return x // expected-warning {{cannot return 'inout sending' parameter 'x' from global function 'returnInOutSendingDirectly'}}
// expected-note @-1 {{returning 'x' risks concurrent access since caller assumes that 'x' and the result of global function 'returnInOutSendingDirectly' can be safely sent to different isolation domains}}
}
```
* Returning a value in the same region as an 'inout sending' parameter. E.x.:
```swift
func returnInOutSendingRegionVar(_ x: inout sending NonSendableKlass) -> NonSendableKlass {
var y = x
y = x
return y // expected-warning {{cannot return 'y' from global function 'returnInOutSendingRegionVar'}}
// expected-note @-1 {{returning 'y' risks concurrent access to 'inout sending' parameter 'x' since the caller assumes that 'x' and the result of global function 'returnInOutSendingRegionVar' can be safely sent to different isolation domains}}
}
```
* Returning the result of a function or computed property that is in the same
region as the 'inout parameter'.
```swift
func returnInOutSendingViaHelper(_ x: inout sending NonSendableKlass) -> NonSendableKlass {
let y = x
return useNonSendableKlassAndReturn(y) // expected-warning {{cannot return result of global function 'useNonSendableKlassAndReturn' from global function 'returnInOutSendingViaHelper'}}
// expected-note @-1 {{returning result of global function 'useNonSendableKlassAndReturn' risks concurrent access to 'inout sending' parameter 'x' since the caller assumes that 'x' and the result of global function 'returnInOutSendingViaHelper' can be safely sent to different isolation domains}}
}
```
Additionally, I had to introduce a specific variant for each of these
diagnostics for cases where due to us being in a method, we are actually in our
caller causing the 'inout sending' parameter to be in the same region as an
actor isolated value:
* Returning 'inout sending' directly:
```swift
extension MyActor {
func returnInOutSendingDirectly(_ x: inout sending NonSendableKlass) -> NonSendableKlass {
return x // expected-warning {{cannot return 'inout sending' parameter 'x' from instance method 'returnInOutSendingDirectly'}}
// expected-note @-1 {{returning 'x' risks concurrent access since caller assumes that 'x' is not actor-isolated and the result of instance method 'returnInOutSendingDirectly' is 'self'-isolated}}
}
}
```
* Returning a value in the same region as an 'inout sending' parameter. E.x.:
```swift
extension MyActor {
func returnInOutSendingRegionLet(_ x: inout sending NonSendableKlass) -> NonSendableKlass {
let y = x
return y // expected-warning {{cannot return 'y' from instance method 'returnInOutSendingRegionLet'}}
// expected-note @-1 {{returning 'y' risks concurrent access to 'inout sending' parameter 'x' since the caller assumes that 'x' is not actor-isolated and the result of instance method 'returnInOutSendingRegionLet' is 'self'-isolated}}
}
}
```
* Returning the result of a function or computed property that is in the same region as the 'inout parameter'.
```swift
extension MyActor {
func returnInOutSendingViaHelper(_ x: inout sending NonSendableKlass) -> NonSendableKlass {
let y = x
return useNonSendableKlassAndReturn(y) // expected-warning {{cannot return result of global function 'useNonSendableKlassAndReturn' from instance method 'returnInOutSendingViaHelper'; this is an error in the Swift 6 language mode}}
// expected-note @-1 {{returning result of global function 'useNonSendableKlassAndReturn' risks concurrent access to 'inout sending' parameter 'x' since the caller assumes that 'x' is not actor-isolated and the result of instance method 'returnInOutSendingViaHelper' is 'self'-isolated}}
}
}
```
To implement this, I used two different approaches depending on whether or not
the returned value was generic or not.
* Concrete
In the case where we had a concrete value, I was able to in simple cases emit
diagnostics based off of the values returned by the return inst. In cases where
we phied together results due to multiple results in the same function, we
determine which of the incoming phied values caused the error by grabbing the
exit partition information of each of the incoming value predecessors and seeing
if an InOutSendingAtFunctionExit would emit an error.
* Generic
In the case of generic code, it is a little more interesting since the result is
a value stored in an our parameter instead of being a value directly returned by
a return inst. To work around this, I use PrunedLiveness to determine the last
values stored into the out parameter in the function to avoid having to do a
full dataflow. Then I take the exit blocks where we assign each of those values
and run the same check as we do in the direct phi case to emit the appropriate
error.
rdar://152454571
The specific code path is the code used to emit errors if we assign or merge
into a sending result. I just left the code in tree in the short term to prevent
cherry-picking issues and since there wasn't a strong reason to do it at the
time. Now that we have more freedom, lets clean up this code!
add `Test`, which is the SIL-equivalent of `FunctionTest`.
It's invocation closure gets a `TestContext` instead of a `FunctionContext`.
^ The commit message #2 will be skipped:
^ - test
This allows to move many SIL APIs and utilities, which require a context, to the SIL module.
The SIL-part of SwiftPassInvocation is extracted into a base class SILContext which now lives in SIL.
Also: simplify the begin/end-pass functions of the SwiftPassInvocation.
