...instead of relying on the one in the overlay in pre-4.2 versions of
Swift. This caused crashes in deserialization, which (deliberately)
doesn't respect availability.
There are three changes here:
- Remove UIEdgeInsets.zero and UIOffset.zero from the UIKit overlay.
- Always use the 4.2 name for UIEdgeInsetsZero and UIOffsetZero from
the underlying UIKit framework. (This is the nested name.)
- Ignore the unavailability messages for those two constants in
pre-4.2 Swift, since we're now relying on them being present.
The latter two, the compiler changes, can go away once UIKit's API
notes no longer specify different pre-4.2 behavior, but meanwhile we
need to keep compatibility with the SDKs released in Xcode 10b1.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-7879
If the Clang declrations are *types*, canonical declaration in Swift is
imported for newest version of Swift. In interface generation, if the
declaration is versioned and it's imported as a member in either or both
version of Swift, we have to take compatibility typealias into account.
* Fixed 'ClangModuleUnit::getTopLevelDecls' to take isCompatibilityAlias() into account
* Fixed bugs in ClangImporter where member-to-member versioned types aren't properly imported.
* Fixed 'SwiftDeclConverter::importFullName' to check equality of getEffectiveContext()
* Fixed 'importer::addEntryToLookupTable' to check equality of getEffectiveContext()
(moved 'ClangImporter::Implementation::forEachDistinctName' to 'NameImporter')
As of r332598, clang::VersionTuple only stores '.' as delimiters. On input any
'_' are converted to the '.' representation. So by the time it gets to swift, we
are guaranteed to have a '.' representation. So we can just drop any reference
to the flag and carry on.
rdar://36765072
In APINotes, when an unversioned name overrides
a previously declared name with a Swift version, if the
previously declared name is guarded under version 4
the obsoleted version should be 4.2, not 5. In all other
cases, the obsoleted version is the next major Swift
version.
Fixes rdar://problem/39950937
Rather than ASTContext-allocating ConcreteDeclRef’s storage when there is a
non-empty substitution map, put the SubstitutionMap directly in the
ConcreteDeclRef. Simplify the various interfaces along the way.
Replace two prominent uses of SubstitutionList, in ConcreteDeclRef and
Witness, with SubstitutionMap. Deal with the myriad places where we
now have substitution maps and need substitution lists (or vice versa)
caused by this change.
Overall, removes ~50 explicit uses of SubstitutionList (of ~400).
When the swift_bridged_typedef attribute is present on a typedef,
import the underlying type as bridged (e.g., String) rather than as
its unbridged type (e.g., NSString).
Fixes rdar://problem/39497900.
Unfortunately imported classes still have to go through this
code path because it's the only place where we can calculate
inheritsSuperclassInitializers().
...and fix places where it was being used inappropriately.
- Don't use 'open' on non-class members in the importer.
- Use the existing 'copyFormalAccessFrom' instead of an ad hoc version
for synthesized typealiases for protocol conformances. (This can
change 'internal' down to 'fileprivate', but only where the
enclosing type was already 'private' or 'fileprivate'.)
- Fix 'copyFormalAccessFrom' to not copy '@usableFromInline' onto
declarations that don't support it (namely, the above typealiases).
This should have no visible effect in practice.
Rather than relying on the NameAliasType we get by default for references
to non-generic typealiases, use BoundNameAliasType consistently to handle
references to typealiases that are formed by the type checker.
This doesn't have a specific effect now, because all of these places
are likely to only see NameAliasType, but it is refactoring with the
intent of eliminating NameAliasType entirely.
The importer would only synthesize its own memberwise init if the
declaration had a zero initializer, which supresses Sema's automatic
synthesis. Trouble is we cannot rely on Sema synthesizing the
memberwise init in case we deserialize declarations after type
checking.
Some other changes caught this with an assert, so fix the importer
to do the right thing here.
As Doug pointed out in the original review where this went in, this
isn't the normal way to do a type substitution. However, all the usual
methods depend on the conformance's generic signature being fully
filled in. Add a comment because, well, I don't have a better answer.
Still to do: test and fix up the use of multiple enum_extensibility
annotations, possibly with API notes. This is important because the
definition of NS/CF_ENUM /includes/ enum_extensibility(open) as of
Xcode 9.0; there should be a convenient out people can use to declare
exhaustive enums in C that's backwards-compatible.
(currently spelled with an underscore to indicate its WIP state)
Later commits will handle imported enums correctly and implement the
checks for switch cases.
We have a predicate in ClassDecl, 'inheritsSuperclassInitializers',
that is used in a few places to decide if we need to do lookups into a
superclass to find all relevant initializers. That's useful, but the
actual work being computed in that function is almost identical to the
work done in figuring out whether the class has provided all its
superclass's /required/ initializers, which is part of the type
checker operation 'resolveImplicitConstructors'. Furthermore,
'inheritsSuperclassInitializers' is /already/ calling
'resolveImplicitConstructors' because those implicit constructors
might affect the result.
Simplify this whole mess and prevent further inconsistencies like the
previous commit by just making 'resolveImplicitConstructors' decide
whether superclass convenience initializers are inherited. It does
make that function more complicated, but with the benefit of not
having duplication anymore.
No intended user-visible change, except that this bit is now
serialized instead of being recomputed, which means the module format
changed.
This allows them to be used in generic arguments for NSArray et al.
We already do this for the ones that wrap bridged values (like
NSString/String), but failed to do it for objects that /weren't/
bridged to Swift values (class instances and protocol compositions),
or for Error-which-is-special.
In addition to this being a sensible thing to do, /not/ doing this led
to IRGen getting very confused (i.e. crashing) when we imported a
Objective-C protocol that actually used an NS_TYPED_ENUM in this way.
(We actually shouldn't be using Swift's IRGen logic to emit protocol
descriptors for imported protocols at all, because it's possible we
weren't able to import all the requirements. But that's a separate
issue.)
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-6844
Swift currently assumes that copies and deinitializations of C structs
are always "trivial", i.e. a copy can be done by just copying the raw
bits of the value, and a deinit requires no work at all. Until we do
anything to change that, just don't import any of the new C structs
that have non-trivial copy or deinitialization operations (those with
ARC references in them).
rdar://problem/35698831
Despite their similar names and uses, these protocols no longer share
much functionality - the former is used to take @objc enums defined in
Swift that conform to Error and expose them as NSErrors, and the
latter handles NS_ERROR_ENUM C enums, which get imported into Swift as
a wrapper around NSError. We can actually simplify them quite a bit.
- Eliminate base protocol __BridgedNSError, which no longer provides
any implementation for _BridgedStoredNSError.
- Eliminate default implementations that match what the compiler would
synthesize.
- Adopt recursive constraints and where-clauses on associated types
(and update the Clang importer to handle this).
- Collapse signed and unsigned default implementations when reasonable.
- Fold _BridgedStoredNSError's _nsErrorDomain into the existing public
requirement CustomNSError.errorDomain.
rdar://problem/35230080
(rather than 'open')
This attribute was originally introduced for Swift classes exposed to
Objective-C, but if it /is/ used on a pure Objective-C class Swift
should respect it. There might be an actual reason, such as a hot code
path in ContrivedExampleKit checking against the class object's
address instead of using -isKindOfClass:.
For source compatibility, only enforce this in Swift 5 mode.
rdar://problem/33971529
Stop creating ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> so that we can remove it
from the type system.
Enable the code that generates disjunctions for Optional<T> and
rewrites expressions based on the original declared type being 'T!'.
Most of the changes supporting this were previously merged to master,
but some things were difficult to merge to master without actually
removing IUOs from the type system:
- Dynamic member lookup and dynamic subscripting
- Changes to ensure the bridging peephole still works
Past commits have attempted to retain as much fidelity with how we
were printing things as possible. There are some cases where we still
are not printing things the same way:
- In diagnostics we will print '?' rather than '!'
- Some SourceKit and Code Completion output where we print a Type
rather than Decl.
Things like module printing via swift-ide-test attempt to print '!'
any place that we now have Optional types that were declared as IUOs.
There are some diagnostics regressions related to the fact that we can
no longer "look through" IUOs. For the same reason some output and
functionality changes in Code Completion. I have an idea of how we can
restore these, and have opened a bug to investigate doing so.
There are some small source compatibility breaks that result from
this change:
- Results of dynamic lookup that are themselves declared IUO can in
rare circumstances be inferred differently. This shows up in
test/ClangImporter/objc_parse.swift, where we have
var optStr = obj.nsstringProperty
Rather than inferring optStr to be 'String!?', we now infer this to
be 'String??', which is in line with the expectations of SE-0054.
The fact that we were only inferring the outermost IUO to be an
Optional in Swift 4 was a result of the incomplete implementation of
SE-0054 as opposed to a particular design. This should rarely cause
problems since in the common-case of actually using the property rather
than just assigning it to a value with inferred type, we will behave
the same way.
- Overloading functions with inout parameters strictly by a difference
in optionality (i.e. Optional<T> vs. ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T>)
will result in an error rather than the diagnostic that was added
in Swift 4.1.
- Any place where '!' was being used where it wasn't supposed to be
allowed by SE-0054 will now treat the '!' as if it were '?'.
Swift 4.1 generates warnings for these saying that putting '!'
in that location is deprecated. These locations include for example
typealiases or any place where '!' is nested in another type like
`Int!?` or `[Int!]`.
This commit effectively means ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> is no
longer part of the type system, although I haven't actually removed
all of the code dealing with it yet.
ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> is is dead, long live implicitly
unwrapped Optional<T>!
Resolves rdar://problem/33272674.
That is, if the wrapped type conforms to special known protocol X via
synthesized conformance to protocol Y which inherits from X, the
wrapper should conform to X as well.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-6842
