1) Document that a series of '.' are operators.
2) '@' was dropped as an operator in r5019.
3) Move some commentary into the main documentation.
4) Better cross-referencing.
5) Tuple dot expressions use integer literals, not $identifiers.
Swift SVN r13694
- purge @inout from comments in the compiler except for places talking about
the SIL argument convention.
- change diagnostics to not refer to @inout
- Change the astprinter to print InoutType without the @, so it doesn't show
up in diagnostics or in closure argument types in code completion.
- Implement type parsing support for the new inout syntax (before we just
handled patterns).
- Switch the last couple of uses in the stdlib (in types) to inout.
- Various testcase updates (more to come).
Swift SVN r13564
There were a lot of instances of "Enumerable" that really should have
been changed already. Along the way, I also
* Moved the adaptor that allows a Stream to be used as a Sequence into
CompilerProtocols.swift; it's just an affordance to work around
temporary inability to express the Stream protocol properly
* Made a trivial simplification in Algorithm.swift
Swift SVN r11946
This completes the FileUnit refactoring. A module consists of multiple
FileUnits, which provide decls from various file-like sources. I say
"file-like" because the Builtin module is implemented with a single
BuiltinUnit, and imported Clang modules are just a single FileUnit source
within a module.
Most modules, therefore, contain a single file unit; only the main module
will contain multiple source files (and eventually partial AST files).
The term "translation unit" has been scrubbed from the project. To refer
to the context of declarations outside of any other declarations, use
"top-level" or "module scope". To refer to a .swift file or its DeclContext,
use "source file". To refer to a single unit of compilation, use "module",
since the model is that an entire module will be compiled with a single
driver call. (It will still be possible to compile a single source file
through the direct-to-frontend interface, but only in the context of the
whole module.)
Swift SVN r10837
This allows expressions such as ".foo" and ".foo(1)" to refer to
static variables and static methods, respectively, as well as enum
cases.
To get here, rework the parsing of delayed identifier expressions a
bit, so that the argument itself is part of the delayed argument
expression rather than a separate call expression. This simplifies
both the handling of patterns of this form and the type checker, which
can now user simpler constraints.
If we really want to support (.foo)(1), we can make that work, but it
seems unnecessary and perhaps confusing.
Swift SVN r10626
I tried hard find all references to 'func' in documentation, comments and
diagnostics, but I am sure that I missed a few. If you find something, please
let me know.
rdar://15346654
Swift SVN r9886
There are still some [infix_left=] in the text. Based on
r4627 it looks like these can just be deleted, but I haven't
done so at this time.
Swift SVN r9616
Also, improve error recovery for new-syntax attributes.
This means that we now compile the testcase into:
t.swift:3:16: error: unknown attribute 'xyz'
var x : () -> @xyz Int
^
t.swift:6:16: error: unknown attribute 'xyz'
func foo() -> @xyz Int {
^
instead of:
t.swift:4:15: error: expected type for function result
func foo() -> @xyz Int {
^
t.swift:4:14: error: consecutive statements on a line must be separated by ';'
func foo() -> @xyz Int {
^
;
t.swift:4:16: error: unknown attribute 'xyz'
func foo() -> @xyz Int {
^
t.swift:7:1: error: expected declaration
^
this is part of rdar://15183765
Swift SVN r9260
Now that we have a solid Optional-based story for dynamic casts, it's no longer needed, and can be expressed as '(x as T)!'. Future refinement of the 'as' syntax will deal with the unfortunate extra parens.
Swift SVN r9181
As with the monadic '?', we treat any left-bound '!' as a postfix
operator. Currently, it extracts the value of its optional
subexpression, failing at run-time if the optional is empty.
Swift SVN r8948
Require that either T be default constructible or that the user provide a closure that maps indices to initial values. We don't actually call the closure yet to initialize the array; that's blocked on function abstraction difference <rdar://problem/13251236>.
Swift SVN r8801
For consistency with our other decl types. There aren't any case-specific attributes yet, but if/when we add them, this is where they'll go.
Swift SVN r8779
These are the terms sent out in the proposal last week and described in
StoredAndComputedVariables.rst.
variable
anything declared with 'var'
member variable
a variable inside a nominal type (may be an instance variable or not)
property
another term for "member variable"
computed variable
a variable with a custom getter or setter
stored variable
a variable with backing storage; any non-computed variable
These terms pre-exist in SIL and IRGen, so I only attempted to solidify
their definitions. Other than the use of "field" for "tuple element",
none of these should be exposed to users.
field
a tuple element, or
the underlying storage for a stored variable in a struct or class
physical
describes an entity whose value can be accessed directly
logical
describes an entity whose value must be accessed through some accessor
Swift SVN r8698
