Modules loaded from the resource dir are not usually rebuilt from the
swiftinterface as it would indicate a configuration problem. Lift that
behavior for SDK mismatch and still rebuild them.
This use case applies when a toolchain is used with a different SDK than
the one use to build the modules in the toolchain.
rdar://106101760
Add '-validate-clang-modules-once' and '-clang-build-session-file' corresponding to Clang's '-fmodules-validate-once-per-build-session' and '-fbuild-session-file='. Ensure they are propagated to module interface build sub-invocations.
We require these to be first-class Swift options in order to ensure they are propagated to both: ClangImporter and implicit interface build compiler sub-invocations.
Compiler portion of rdar://105982120
Since https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/63178 added support for Clang modules in the explicit module map, it is possible for there to be multiple modules with the same name: a Swift module and a Clang module. The current parsing logic just overwrites the corresponding entry module in a hashmap so we always only preserved the module that comes last, with the same name.
This change separates the parsing of the modulemap JSON file to produce a separate Swift module map and Clang module map. The Swift one is used by the 'ExplicitSwiftModuleLoader', as before, and the Clang one is only used to populate the ClangArgs with the requried -fmodule-... flags.
In https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/42486 new behavior was introduced to ignore adjacent .swiftmodule files in the SDK. This behavior has caught a few people off guard so it seems like there should be diagnostics clarifying why a rebuild is occurring in this scenario.
Resolves rdar://105477473
If a module was first read using the adjacent swiftmodule and then
reloaded using the swiftinterface, we would do an up to date check on
the adjacent module but write out the unit using the swiftinterface.
This would cause the same modules to be indexed repeatedly for the first
invocation using a new SDK. On the next run we would instead raad the
swiftmodule from the cache and thus the out of date check would match
up.
The impact of this varies depending on the size of the module graph in
the initial compilation and the number of jobs started at the same time.
Each SDK dependency is re-indexed *and* reloaded, which is a drain on
both CPU and memory. Thus, if many jobs are initially started and
they're all going down this path, it can cause the system to run out of
memory very quickly.
Resolves rdar://103119964.
This lets users of `-explicit-swift-module-map-file` use a single mapping
for all module dependencies, regardless of whether they're Swift or Clang
modules, instead of manually splitting them among this file and command
line flags.
`getValue` -> `value`
`getValueOr` -> `value_or`
`hasValue` -> `has_value`
`map` -> `transform`
The old API will be deprecated in the rebranch.
To avoid merge conflicts, use the new API already in the main branch.
rdar://102362022
Intro ASTContext::setIgnoreAdjacentModules to change module loading to
accept load only resilient modules from their swiftinterfaces, ignoring
the adjacent module and any silencing swiftinterfaces errors.
For release-management purposes during development, LLDB's embedded Swift
compiler's version number can sometimes be off-by-one in the last digit
compared to the Swift compiler.
This patch restores the old behavior from before 17183629e4.
rdar://101299168
This flag restricts availability of certain symbols to ensure the code cannot use declarations that are explicitly unavalable to extensions. This restriction should be passed down to dependency modules also.
Basic should not be allowed to link Parse, yet it was doing so
to allow Version to provide a constructor that would conveniently
parse a StringRef. This entrypoint also emitted diagnostics, so it
pulled in libAST.
Sink the version parser entrypoint down into Parse where it belongs
and point all the clients to the right place.
Previously, when evaluating a `#if canImport(Module, _version: 42)` directive the compiler could diagnose and ignore the directive under the following conditions:
- The associated binary module is corrupt/bogus.
- The .tbd for an underlying Clang module is missing a current-version field.
This behavior is surprising when there is a valid `.swiftinterface` available and it only becomes apparent when building against an SDK with an old enough version of the module that the version in the `.swiftinterface` is too low, making this failure easy to miss. Some modules have different versioning systems for their Swift and Clang modules and it can also be intentional for a distributed binary `.swiftmodule` to contain bogus data (to force the compiler to recompile the `.swiftinterface`) so we need to handle both of these cases gracefully and predictably.
Now the compiler will enumerate all module loaders, ask each of them to attempt to parse the module version and then consistently use the parsed version from a single source. The `.swiftinterface` is preferred if present, then the binary module if present, and then finally the `.tbd`. The `.tbd` is still always used exclusively for the `_underlyingVersion` variant of `canImport()`.
Resolves rdar://88723492
Prebuilt modules are only available for certain toolchain and SDK combinations. Therefore,
building modules from interface, even for the stdlib, is expected to happen.
related: rdar://96701615
Change the way swiftmodules built against a different SDK than their
clients are rejected. This makes them silently ignored when the module
can be rebuilt from their swiftinterface, instead of reporting a hard
error.
rdar://93257769
Always use the swiftinterfaces of modules under the public Frameworks
folder in the SDK. Distributed swiftmodules are unreliable, they should
only be used as a local cache. Let's avoid them when possible.
rdar://92037292
While implicitly building .swiftinterface, the interface may import other binary modules.
These binary modules may contain serialized search paths that have been obfuscated. To help
interface building commands recover these search paths, we need to pass down the obfuscators
to the module building commands.
rdar://87840268
When looking for a Swift module on disk, we were scanning all module search paths if they contain the module we are searching for. In a setup where each module is contained in its own framework search path, this scaled quadratically with the number of modules being imported. E.g. a setup with 100 modules being imported form 100 module search paths could cause on the order of 10,000 checks of `FileSystem::exists`. While these checks are fairly fast (~10µs), they add up to ~100ms.
To improve this, perform a first scan of all module search paths and list the files they contain. From this, create a lookup map that maps filenames to the search paths they can be found in. E.g. for
```
searchPath1/
Module1.framework
searchPath2/
Module1.framework
Module2.swiftmodule
```
we create the following lookup table
```
Module1.framework -> [searchPath1, searchPath2]
Module2.swiftmodule -> [searchPath2]
```
Instead of checking that the stdlib can be loaded in a variety of places, check it when setting up the compiler instance. This required a couple more checks to avoid loading the stdlib in cases where it’s not needed.
To be able to differentiate stdlib loading failures from other setup errors, make `CompilerInstance::setup` return an error message on failure via an inout parameter. Consume that error on the call side, replacing a previous, more generic error message, adding error handling where appropriate or ignoring the error message, depending on the context.
