This is needed if we want to use Substitution::subst from inside Type::subst, which will be necessary for SILBoxTypes and maybe some day BoundGenericTypes. NFC yet.
Type substitution works on a fairly narrow set of types: generic type
parameters (to, e.g., use a generic) and archetypes (to map out of a
generic context). Historically, it was also used with
DependentMemberTypes, but recent refactoring to eliminate witness
markers eliminate that code path.
Therefore, narrow TypeSubstitutionMap's keys to SubstitutableType,
which covers archetypes and generic type parameters. NFC
This function had a weird, pre-ProtocolConformanceRef interface that
returned true when the type conformed to the protocol, then had a
separate indirect return value for the concrete conformance (if there
is one). Refactor this API, and the similar
TypeChecker::containsProtocol(), to produce an optional
ProtocolConformanceRef, which is far more idiomatic and easier to
use. Push ProtocolConformanceRef into a few more places. Should be NFC
Reimplement the witness matching logic used for generic requirements
so that it properly models the expectations required of the witness,
then captures the results in the AST. The new approach has a number of
advantages over the existing hacks:
* The constraint solver no longer requires hacks to try to tangle
together the innermost archetypes from the requirement with the
outer archetypes of the context of the protocol
conformance. Instead, we create a synthetic set of archetypes that
describes the requirement as it should be matched against
witnesses. This eliminates the infamous 'SelfTypeVar' hack.
* The type checker no longer records substitutions involving a weird
mix of archetypes from different contexts (see above), so it's
actually plausible to reason about the substitutions of a witness. A
new `Witness` class contains the declaration, substitutions, and all
other information required to interpret the witness.
* SILGen now uses the substitution information for witnesses when
building witness thunks, rather than computing all of it from
scratch. ``substSelfTypeIntoProtocolRequirementType()` is now gone
(absorbed into the type checker, and improved from there), and the
witness-thunk emission code is simpler. A few other bits of SILGen
got simpler because the substitutions can now be trusted.
* Witness matching and thunk generation involving generic requirements
and nested generics now works, based on some work @slavapestov was
already doing in this area.
* The AST verifier can now verify the archetypes that occur in witness substitutions.
* Although it's not in this commit, the `Witness` structure is
suitable for complete (de-)serialization, unlike the weird mix of
archetypes previously present.
Fixes rdar://problem/24079818 and cleans up an area that's been messy
and poorly understood for a very, very long time.
This patch is rather large, since it was hard to make this change
incrementally, but most of the changes are mechanical.
Now that we have a lighter-weight data structure in the AST for mapping
interface types to archetypes and vice versa, use that in SIL instead of
a GenericParamList.
This means that when serializing a SILFunction body, we no longer need to
serialize references to archetypes from other modules.
Several methods used for forming substitutions can now be moved from
GenericParamList to GenericEnvironment.
Also, GenericParamList::cloneWithOuterParameters() and
GenericParamList::getEmpty() can now go away, since they were only used
when SILGen-ing witness thunks.
Finally, when printing generic parameters with identical names, the
SIL printer used to number them from highest depth to lowest, by
walking generic parameter lists starting with the innermost one.
Now, ambiguous generic parameters are numbered from lowest depth
to highest, by walking the generic signature, which means test
output in one of the SILGen tests has changed.
Not the superclass's. This can cause mapping types out of context to not
resolve archetypes, because the DeclContexts won't match, e.g:
internal class _IteratorBox<Base: IteratorProtocol> :
_AnyIteratorBoxBase<Base.Element> { internal override func next() ->
Base.Element? }
Here, _IteratorBox's associated type Element for IteratorProtocol is
Base.Element, but the conformance comes from the superclass,
_AnyIteratorBoxBase. This meant that Base.Element couldn't be mapped to
an interface type, which should be:
(dependent-member
(generic-type-parameter depth=0 index=0) member=Element)
It appears we were only using this to see if an associated type was
derived or defaulted. This code didn't mesh well with the other stuff
I was doing for default implementations, so I'd rather rip it out and
just rely on calling 'isImplicit' to check for derived associated
types instead.
Note that there's a small change of behavior -- if an associated type
is derived for one conformance, and then used as a witness in another,
we were previously only marking it as defaulted in the first one,
but now it is marked as defaulted in both. I do not believe this has
any meaningful consequences.
Migrate the check for whether a given type is representable in
Objective-C, which is currently used to verify when @objc can be
inferred or verify that an explicitly-written @objc is well-formed,
from Sema into a set of queries on the Type within the AST library, so
it can be used in other parts of the compiler.
As part of this refactoring, clean up and improve a number of aspects
of this code:
* Unify the "trivially representable" and "representable" code paths
into a single code path that covers these cases. Clarify the
different levels of "representable" we have in both the code and
in comments.
* Distinguish between representation in C vs. representation in
Objective-C. While we aren't using this now, I'm anticipating it
being useful to allow exporting C interfaces via @_cdecl (or
similar).
* Eliminate the special cases for bridging String/Array/Dictionary/Set
with their Foundation counterparts; we now consult
_ObjectiveCBridgeable conformances exclusively to get this
information.
* Cache foreign-representation information on the ASTContext in a
manner that will let us more easily get the right answer across
different contexts while providing more sharing than the TypeChecker
version.
Annoyingly, this only seemed to fix a small class of error where we
were permitting Unsafe(Mutable)Pointer<T> to be representable in
Objective-C when T was representable but not trivially representable,
e.g., T=String or T=AnyObject.Type.
When performing Swift API dumps, it's helpful to avoid putting
redundant APIs into the results. Therefore, filter out any APIs that
are overrides of another API or are witnesses for a protocol
requirement, since the original definition (that doesn't override any
other or is a protocol requirement) is what determines the APIs name.
Fix some interface type/context type confusion in the AST synthesis from the previous patch, add a unique private mangling for behavior protocol conformances, and set up SILGen to emit the conformances when property declarations with behaviors are visited. Disable synthesis of the struct memberwise initializer if any instance properties use behaviors; codegen will need to be redesigned here.
Parse 'var [behavior] x: T', and when we see it, try to instantiate the property's
implementation in terms of the given behavior. To start out, behaviors are modeled
as protocols. If the protocol follows this pattern:
```
protocol behavior {
associatedtype Value
}
extension behavior {
var value: Value { ... }
}
```
then the property is instantiated by forming a conformance to `behavior` where
`Self` is bound to the enclosing type and `Value` is bound to the property's
declared type, and invoking the accessors of the `value` implementation:
```
struct Foo {
var [behavior] foo: Int
}
/* behaves like */
extension Foo: private behavior {
@implements(behavior.Value)
private typealias `[behavior].Value` = Int
var foo: Int {
get { return value }
set { value = newValue }
}
}
```
If the protocol requires a `storage` member, and provides an `initStorage` method
to provide an initial value to the storage:
```
protocol storageBehavior {
associatedtype Value
var storage: Something<Value> { ... }
}
extension storageBehavior {
var value: Value { ... }
static func initStorage() -> Something<Value> { ... }
}
```
then a stored property of the appropriate type is instantiated to witness the
requirement, using `initStorage` to initialize:
```
struct Foo {
var [storageBehavior] foo: Int
}
/* behaves like */
extension Foo: private storageBehavior {
@implements(storageBehavior.Value)
private typealias `[storageBehavior].Value` = Int
@implements(storageBehavior.storage)
private var `[storageBehavior].storage`: Something<Int> = initStorage()
var foo: Int {
get { return value }
set { value = newValue }
}
}
```
In either case, the `value` and `storage` properties should support any combination
of get-only/settable and mutating/nonmutating modifiers. The instantiated property
follows the settability and mutating-ness of the `value` implementation. The
protocol can also impose requirements on the `Self` and `Value` types.
Bells and whistles such as initializer expressions, accessors,
out-of-line initialization, etc. are not implemented. Additionally, behaviors
that instantiate storage are currently only supported on instance properties.
This also hasn't been tested past sema yet; SIL and IRGen will likely expose
additional issues.
TypeAlignments.h predates this whole mess; it was used for types with
stronger alignment in PointerLikeTypeTraits than the old default of
"2 by fiat and assumption". All remaining forward-declared types are
AST types, so fold them into TypeAlignments.h.
(The one exception is SILTypeList.h, but that's already gone on master.)
To avoid future ODR issues, explicitly include TypeAlignments.h into
every header that defines a type it forward-declares.
I wish we could use partial specialization to provide PointerLikeTypeTraits
for all derived classes of Decl, TypeBase, etc, but that's not something
you can do in C++ if you don't control the traits class.
This eliminates some minor overheads, but mostly it eliminates
a lot of conceptual complexity due to the overhead basically
appearing outside of its context.
The main idea here is that we really, really want to be
able to recover the protocol requirement of a conformance
reference even if it's abstract due to the conforming type
being abstract (e.g. an archetype). I've made the conversion
from ProtocolConformance* explicit to discourage casual
contamination of the Ref with a null value.
As part of this change, always make conformance arrays in
Substitutions fully parallel to the requirements, as opposed
to occasionally being empty when the conformances are abstract.
As another part of this, I've tried to proactively fix
prospective bugs with partially-concrete conformances, which I
believe can happen with concretely-bound archetypes.
In addition to just giving us stronger invariants, this is
progress towards the removal of the archetype from Substitution.
A protocol conformance needs to know what declarations satisfy requirements;
these are called "witnesses". For a value (non-type) witness, this takes the
form of a ConcreteDeclRef, i.e. a ValueDecl plus any generic specialization.
(Think Array<Int> rather than Array<T>, but for a function.)
This information is necessary to compile the conformance, but it causes
problems when the conformance is used from other modules. In particular,
the type used in a specialization might itself be a generic type in the
form of an ArchetypeType. ArchetypeTypes can't be meaningfully used
outside their original context, however, so this is a weird thing to
have to deal with. (I'm not going to go into when a generic parameter is
represented by an ArchetypeType vs. a GenericTypeParamType, partially
because I don't think I can explain it well myself.)
The above issue becomes a problem when we go to use the conformance from
another module. If module C uses a conformance from module B that has a
generic witness from module A, it'll think that the archetypes in the
specialization for the witness belong in module B. Which is just wrong.
It turns out, however, that no code is using the full specializations for
witnesses except for when the conformance is being compiled and emitted.
So this commit sidesteps the problem by just not serializing the
specializations that go with the ConcreteDeclRef for a value witness.
This doesn't fix the underlying issue, so we should probably still see
if we can either get archetypes from other contexts out of value witness
ConcreteDeclRefs, or come up with reasonable rules for when they're okay
to use.
rdar://problem/23892955
Apart from being general compile-time goodness, this helps break a
circularity issue involving serialization cross-references and the
Clang importer.
The test is being added to validation-tests because it relies on
several levels of non-laziness in the compiler, all of which we'd
like to fix. It's making sure we don't regress here, but it isn't
actually verifying this change in particular.
rdar://problem/22364953
Swift SVN r31455
Specifically track when we're resolving type witnesses for a given
conformance, and refuse to recursively attempt to resolve those type
witnesses. The standard library patch in rdar://problem/21789238
triggers this, and isolating it in a small test case has proven
illusive.
Swift SVN r30160
Modules occupy a weird space in the AST now: they can be treated like
types (Swift.Int), which is captured by ModuleType. They can be
treated like values for disambiguation (Swift.print), which is
captured by ModuleExpr. And we jump through hoops in various places to
store "either a module or a decl".
Start cleaning this up by transforming Module into ModuleDecl, a
TypeDecl that's implicitly created to describe a module. Subsequent
changes will start folding away the special cases (ModuleExpr ->
DeclRefExpr, name lookup results stop having a separate Module case,
etc.).
Note that the Module -> ModuleDecl typedef is there to limit the
changes needed. Much of this patch is actually dealing with the fact
that Module used to have Ctx and Name public members that now need to
be accessed via getASTContext() and getName(), respectively.
Swift SVN r28284
Allows us to distinguish between "we know this conformance exists" and
"we're doing a detailed check of this conformance". Use it, rather
than membership in the nebulous ASTContext-wide caching structure
"ConformsTo", to detect recursive attempts to complete a conformance.
Swift SVN r26248
* Lift NormalProtocolConformance::hasTypeWitness() to
ProtocolConformance. This method can be used to determine whether a
potentially invalid conformance has a particular type witness.
* ProtocolConformance::getWitness() may return nullptr if the witness
does not exist.
* In TypeChecker::getWitnessType(), don't complain that a builtin
protocol is broken if it's the conformance that's broken.
* ConformanceChecker should only emit diagnostics from within calls to
checkConformance().
* TypeChecker::conformsToProtocol() now returns true if the type
has a declared conformance to the protocol, regardless of whether the
conformance is valid. Clients must check the validity of the
ProtocolConformance themselves if necessary.
<rdar://problem/19495341> Can't upcast to parent types of type constraints without forcing
Swift SVN r25326
