The logic I had here checked whether an extension used an
implementation-only type whenever there was a declaration within that
extension that needed checking...but unfortunately that included not
just PatternBindingDecls (whose access is filtered at a later step)
but things like IfConfigDecls (#if). Change this to only check
signatures of extensions with ABI-public members, something that is
tested once when visiting an ExtensionDecl.
Additionally, skip AccessorDecls entirely, since they'll be tested
as part of the corresponding subscript or var. This saves a duplicate
diagnostic.
rdar://problem/50541589
I thought it would be useful to allow some uses of a module to be
'@_implementationOnly' and others to not be in case someone wanted to
change from one to the other gradually, but it turns out that if
you're trying to /make/ an import implementation-only, you want to
know everywhere you used it.
rdar://problem/50748157
When backward deploying to an OS that may not have these entry points, weak-link them so that they
can be used conditionally in availability contexts that check for them.
rdar://problem/50731151
Check the availability of decls that declare an opaque return type to ensure they deploy to a
runtime that supports opaque types.
rdar://problem/50731151
Introduce an attribute @_disfavoredOverload that can be used to state
that a particular declaration should be avoided if there is a
successful type-check for a non-@_disfavoredOverload. It's a way to
nudge overload resolution away from particular solutions.
This lets us make some more assumptions in the next commit, but I
think it's also just a nice cleanup to /not/ allow random predicates
here.
There were three callers of this API:
- PrintAST, which was using PrintOptions::shouldPrint but /also/
incorrectly notifying listeners that a declaration would be skipped.
- (IDE) Interface generation, which uses PrintOptions::shouldPrint to
count how many "inherits" there will be.
- SwiftDocSupport's reportRelated, which does no filtering at all.
Creating a PrintOptions here is a little more expensive, but still.
No intended functionality change.
These can be recreated if needed in a client library. To do this, I've
added a new ConformanceLookupKind::NonInherited, which can also be
used elsewhere in the project where we're already filtering out
inherited conformances some other way.
Note that this doesn't drop inherited conformances from the entire
serialized interface, just from the list that a class explicitly
declares. They still get referenced sometimes.
rdar://problem/50541451 and possibly others
Similar to 517f5d6b6a, the "shadowed" terminology didn't end up
describing the most common use of the feature; there is pretty much no
intended case where a Swift module shadows a Clang module without also
re-exporting it. Switch to "underlying", which was already in use in a
few places, and which better parallels "overlay".
No intended functionality change.
This change permits UnresolvedDotExpr to have both a name and a base that are implicit, but a valid DotLoc, and to treat that DotLoc as the node’s location. It then changes the generation of string interpolation code so that `$stringInterpolation.appendInterpolation` references have a DotLoc corresponding to the backslash in the string literal.
This makes it possible for `ExprContextAnalyzer` in IDE to correctly detect when you are code-completing in a string interpolation and treat it as an `appendInterpolation` call.
Replace most remaining uses of isRequirementSignatureComputed by
isRequirementSignatureComputing which uses Evaluator::hasActiveRequest
to detect if the requirements are currently being computed.
Previously 'isSystemModule()' returns true only if the module is:
- Standard library
- Clang module and that is `IsSystem`
- Swift overlay for clang `IsSystem` module
Now:
- Clang module and that is `IsSystem`; or
- Swift overlay for clang `IsSystem` module
- Swift module found in either of these directories:
- Runtime library directoris (including stdlib)
- Frameworks in `-Fsystem` directories
- Frameworks in `$SDKROOT/System/Library/Frameworks/` (Darwin)
- Frameworks in `$SDKROOT/Library/Frameworks/` (Darwin)
rdar://problem/50516314
Replaces the explicit call to computeRequirementSignature from
validateDecl with a lazy getRequirementSignature. A side effect is that
the generic params of a ProtocolDecl are no longer computed from
validateDecl and must be computed lazily too.
