"Accessibility" has a different meaning for app developers, so we've
already deliberately excised it from our diagnostics in favor of terms
like "access control" and "access level". Do the same in the compiler
now that we aren't constantly pulling things into the release branch.
Rename AccessibilityAttr to AccessControlAttr and
SetterAccessibilityAttr to SetterAccessAttr, then track down the last
few uses of "accessibility" that don't have to do with
NSAccessibility. (I left the SourceKit XPC API alone because that's
supposed to be more stable.)
"Accessibility" has a different meaning for app developers, so we've
already deliberately excised it from our diagnostics in favor of terms
like "access control" and "access level". Do the same in the compiler
now that we aren't constantly pulling things into the release branch.
This commit changes the 'Accessibility' enum to be named 'AccessLevel'.
Pushes __consuming through the frontend and extends existing
attribute-based diagnsotics to cover it. Unlike `nonmutating`,
__consuming is allowed in class methods, though it makes little
sense to put it there.
This gets us to the point where we will complete 'T' here:
associatedtype T where #^A^#
And when completing here, we now at least find the correct declaration:
associatedtype T: P where T.#^A^#
There is a remaining issue that in the second example we will not find
members of `P`; we seem to be missing the conformance from the archetype
we get for `T`.
rdar://problem/20582394
Complete generic parameters and their members inside generic where
clauses on structs, classes, enums, extensions, typealiases, funcs,
subscripts and inits.
Still not handled correctly are associatedtypes.
rdar://problem/20582394
Inheritance of a protocol from JavaScriptCore's JSExport protocol is
used to indicate that the methods and properties of that protocol
should be exported to JavaScript. The actual check to determine
whether a protocol (directly) inherits JSExport is performed via the
Objective-C runtime. Note that the presence of JSExport in the
protocol hierarchy is not sufficient; the protocol must directly
inherit JSExport.
Swift warns about redundant conformance requirements and eliminates
them from the requirement signature (and, therefore, the Objective-C
metadata). This behavior is incorrect for JSExport, because the
conformance is actually needed for this API to work properly.
Recognize a protocol's inheritance JSExport specifically (by
name) when computing the requirement signature of the protocol. When
we find such a redundancy, suppress the "redundant conformance
constraint" diagnostic and add a new (hidden) attribute
@_restatedObjCConformance(proto). The attribute is used only by Objective-C
protocol metadata emission to ensure that we get the expected metadata
in the Objective-C runtime.
Fixes rdar://problem/32674145.
...finally breaking the dependency of Parse on Sema.
There are still some unfortunate dependencies here -- Xi's working on
getting /AST/ not dependent on Sema -- but this is a step forward.
It is a little strange that parseIntoSourceFile is in ParseSIL, and
therefore that that's still a dependency for anyone trying to, well,
parse. However, nearly all clients that parse want to type-check as
well, and that requires Sema, Serialization, and the ClangImporter...
and Serialization and SIL currently require each other as well
(another circular dependency). So it's not actively causing us trouble
right now.
Special DeclNames represent names that do not have an identifier in the
surface language. This implies serializing the information about whether
a name is special together with its identifier (if it is not special)
in both the module file and the swift lookup table.
Using these in declaration position has been deprecated and
removed in Swift 3. These attributes were not being parsed and
contained deadweight diagnostics that should have been moved
when these attributes became type attributes.
In anticipation of future attributes, and perhaps the ability to
declare lvalues with specifiers other than 'let' and 'var', expand
the "isLet" bit into a more general "specifier" field.
It is apparently a common mistake for beginners to start the names of functions
etc. with numbers, and before this patch the diagnostic wasn't specific about
the problem. It seems likely that most instances of `func 1(...` will be
mistakes in this vein, so this patch specifically diagnoses that case, and also
parses the number as the identifier to avoid follow on errors about top-level
closures (from the {}) and other invalid syntax.
Fixes rdar://problem/32316666 .
- A mutating method or accessor always has 'inout self'.
- A nonmutating method or accessor never has 'inout self'.
- Only instance members can be mutating.
- Addressors are still addressors even when on static members.
Came up after reviewing another patch that confused the two as
possibly distinct concepts.
This time, the warnings only fire when the class in question directly
conforms to NSCoding. This avoids warning on cases where the user has
subclassed something like, oh, UIViewController, and has no intention
of writing it to a persistent file.
This also removes the warning for generic classes that conform to
NSCoding, for simplicity's sake. That means
'@NSKeyedArchiverEncodeNonGenericSubclassesOnly' is also being
removed.
Actually archiving a class with an unstable mangled name is still
considered problematic, but the compiler shouldn't emit diagnostics
unless it can be sure they are relevant.
rdar://problem/32314195
This is accomplished by recognizing this specific situation and
replacing the 'objc' attribute with a hidden '_objcRuntimeName'
attribute. This /only/ applies to classes that are themselves
non-generic (including any enclosing generic context) but that have
generic ancestry, and thus cannot be exposed directly to Objective-C.
This commit also eliminates '@NSKeyedArchiverClassName'. It was
decided that the distinction between '@NSKeyedArchiverClassName' and
'@objc' was too subtle to be worth explaining to developers, and that
any case where you'd use '@NSKeyedArchiverClassName' was already a
place where the ObjC name wasn't visible at compile time.
This commit does not update diagnostics to reflect this change; we're
going to change them anyway.
rdar://problem/32414557
With the introduction of special decl names, `Identifier getName()` on
`ValueDecl` will be removed and pushed down to nominal declarations
whose name is guaranteed not to be special. Prepare for this by calling
to `DeclBaseName getBaseName()` instead where appropriate.
Resolves: https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4426
* Make IfConfigDecl be able to hold ASTNodes
* Parse #if as IfConfigDecl
* Stop enclosing toplevel #if into TopLevelCodeDecl.
* Eliminate IfConfigStmt
Replace `NameOfType foo = dyn_cast<NameOfType>(bar)` with DRY version `auto foo = dyn_cast<NameOfType>(bar)`.
The DRY auto version is by far the dominant form already used in the repo, so this PR merely brings the exceptional cases (redundant repetition form) in line with the dominant form (auto form).
See the [C++ Core Guidelines](https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#es11-use-auto-to-avoid-redundant-repetition-of-type-names) for a general discussion on why to use `auto` to avoid redundant repetition of type names.
This attribute allows one to provide the "legacy" name of a class for
the purposes of archival (via NSCoding). At the moment, it is only
useful for suppressing the warnings/errors about classes with unstable
archiving names.
Previously, we ignoring 'let', so you would get ridiculous completions:
let var foo: Int
override let func bar() {}
Now, will complete protocol requirements after 'let' the same way we do
for 'var'. For instance property overrides, we only show them if the
'override' keyword is specified. You can't actually override using a
'let', but if the keyword is present then the intention is clear and we
can let the user fix it afterwards when the compiler diagnoses it.
rdar://problem/31091172
